Started By
Message

re: ATF brace rule has been published

Posted on 4/23/23 at 8:50 pm to
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
14062 posts
Posted on 4/23/23 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

Does anyone realize that an atf registered firearm will be very, very hard to sell?

That's one of the appeals to buying guns, very good liquid asset that holds value.

Not so liquid when you have to wait for ATF approval...


I don’t buy firearms to sell them.

I buy guns to shoot them.
Posted by NOLAGT
Over there
Member since Dec 2012
13559 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 7:34 am to
quote:

Does anyone realize that an atf registered firearm will be very, very hard to sell?


You take off the stock and send a letter to the atf to remove it from the registry then you can sell it as a pistol. As far as I know.
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
50066 posts
Posted on 4/25/23 at 8:29 am to
quote:

One of the guns the Nashville shooter had was a braced AR. Doesn’t look good for us.


Us? As mentally unstable idiots?
Posted by Beardlington
Member since Dec 2022
859 posts
Posted on 4/26/23 at 12:28 pm to
ATF on Monday: "It's pronounced po-ta-tow."

ATF on Tuesday: "It's pronounced po-tah-tow."

ATF on Wednesday: "Potatoes are considered machine guns."

ATF on Thursday: "Just kidding - Potatoes are only machine guns if you serve them Au Gratin."

ATF on Friday: "Actually, the mere possession of frozen hash browns is considered possession of a machine gun."

ATF, “if you send us a picture of your potato, address to your potato farm and your recipe for potato soup, you can get your potato peeler stamp for free.
Posted by Lsutigerturner
Member since Dec 2016
5863 posts
Posted on 4/27/23 at 4:39 pm to
Ha good luck, already a few come and take it crowd getting bigger. You can’t just make up a new law and not grandfather old law compliance peopleS in
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35932 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 10:55 pm to
Update:


4/26/2023

ATF Director Dettelbach tells US House Rep. Massie (KY) that all citizens have to do to be in compliance with the rule is simply remove the brace from the gun.

Dettelbach: "If they keep them apart, they can keep the brace, they can keep the business end of the gun. They don't have to register anything."

Rep. Massie: "That's a great clarification. So you're not going to do some constructive prosecution where you say, 'oh, you had this and you had that and you intended to connect them.'

They can just keep them separate?"


Dettelbach: "Detach them and keep them separately."



5/22/2023


now you got this:


https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/what-are-compliance-options-individual-non-licensee-possession-firearm-equipped-




Posted by turkish
Member since Aug 2016
1818 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 11:06 pm to
The other thing I worry about is people seeking the exception and free tax stamp only to find out later that the original 4473 for the firearm originally had the “rifle” box checked. Has this been discussed? How can anyone confirm that original classification?
This post was edited on 5/22/23 at 11:08 pm
Posted by ChatRabbit77
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2013
5865 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 12:08 am to
quote:

How can anyone confirm that original classification?


4473 is kept for 20 years at the store you did the transfer and then goes to ATF. They can trace it if they want. When you did the tax exempt form 1, lying about the status of the braced gun is perjury. You would have to have fricked up on many levels for them to go after you like that...or so i thought until recently with how the feds have been with anyone not aligned with their agenda.
Posted by Kino74
Denham springs
Member since Nov 2013
5347 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 4:11 am to
I just saw that on Mrgunsngear. Big surprise the ATF director lied or is completely disconnected from his agency.

Those that have braced pistols and were worried about filing for the free tax stamp have every reason to be suspicious of the ATF.

In a few days 3 to 10 million gun owners will be categorized as criminals and if anybody thinks the extra $1.8 billion budget to the ATF won't be used against them is a fool.

All this because of the 73rd Congress tried to put handguns on the NFA and the "sportsmen" in the committee couldn't think of a reason why "sportsmen" need a barrel shorter than 18 inches.
Posted by TubaDawg
Member since Mar 2014
177 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 4:28 am to
The ATF can frick off!
Posted by MetroAtlantaGatorFan
Member since Jun 2017
15598 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 11:17 am to
Just wait until the ATF gets proof from credit card companies and knows who bought a brace (because that's exactly what's happening right now with forced reset triggers).
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35932 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 12:08 pm to
5th Circuit just granted an injunction... for the plaintiffs only.

Plaintiffs:
William Mock
Christopher Lewis
Firearms Policy Coalition
Maxim Defense Industries

LINK


According to Guns and Gadgets, this is the first domino. He hinted at another injunction will be coming out today.


8 DAYS LEFT, PEOPLE!!!
Posted by NOLAGT
Over there
Member since Dec 2012
13559 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

The other thing I worry about is people seeking the exception and free tax stamp only to find out later that the original 4473 for the firearm originally had the “rifle” box checked.


If its a "rifle" its always a rifle as far as i know. The free tax stamps were for "pistols" or "others" I think. Things sold with a brace or something that was built to have a brace.
Posted by turkish
Member since Aug 2016
1818 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:39 pm to
Yeah. That’s my point. How many people with AR pistols know for a fact that the dealer didn’t check “rifle” on the 4473 or used a lower from a previously built rifle? Back when I used to own guns, I don’t remember looking at the 4473 for anything other than the portions I filled out.

I guess I’m highlighting sensitivities with taking advantage of the free offer, unless there’s been good scrutiny of the 4473s that were used in the past, potentially a looong time ago. I don’t mean to sound argumentative. I think we’re agreeing with one another.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99652 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

5th Circuit just granted an injunction... for the plaintiffs only.


I get why they did this as it stems from an appeal of the district court's ruling denying the injunction, but it will lead to confusion.

That said, I suspect other courts in the 5th that have a brace case may grant one pending the outcome of that appeal.
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35932 posts
Posted on 5/25/23 at 10:39 pm to
another preliminary injunction (for the plaintiffs only) according to guns and gadegets.


LINK
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79458 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 3:16 pm to
That's pretty incredible for FPC. All members of FPC subject to the injunction.

This is probably the best membership drive that organization will ever have
Posted by BayouBengal51
Forest Hill, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2006
6588 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 3:37 pm to
Been a member with them for a few years now.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16710 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 4:45 pm to
I'm interested if the recent ruling against the EPA will make an impact in future briefs. If this gets to the USSC it could be disastrous for the ATF, they might dump the rule in the trash in an attempt to moot the case at that point.
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 4:48 pm
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35932 posts
Posted on 5/26/23 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

If this gets to the USSC it could be disastrous for the ATF, they might dump the rule in the trash in an attempt to moot the case at that point.


The ATF has actually asked to take up one of these cases. I think it’s the frames and receivers rule they came out with last year.

I’ve actually considered that they’re intentionally doing this to themselves. I bet they’re tired of having to deal with form 1s and form 4s and any other form required to make decisions on. Ever since the AWB from the ‘90s was lifted, the AR15 platform has surged in popularity and technological advances in newer style configurations. Imagine getting asked “is this legal” multiple times a year.

It just sucks that none of these cases are making the argument of whether or not the NFA is specifically constitutional.
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 5:02 pm
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram