- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
65% / 35% Equity to Fixed Income - is this bottom
Posted on 1/5/23 at 11:19 am
Posted on 1/5/23 at 11:19 am
43 years old is it time to buy a little more apple, Microsoft or Tesla?
I really struggle with keeping powder dry. Is it time to fire?
I really struggle with keeping powder dry. Is it time to fire?
Posted on 1/5/23 at 11:21 am to thelawnwranglers
You have 20 years for the market to work for you. Don't time it
Posted on 1/5/23 at 11:23 am to TigerTatorTots
So you think asset allocation is right?
I have always been more aggressive
Also was talking small move not big one
I have always been more aggressive
Also was talking small move not big one
Posted on 1/5/23 at 11:24 am to thelawnwranglers
Depends on your risk profile. I'm behind you at 34 and have maybe 2% in fixed income through a target date fund in my 401k. I have zero desire to put anything into fixed income until I'm a lot older.
Others may disagree.
Others may disagree.
Posted on 1/5/23 at 12:01 pm to TigerTatorTots
quote:
I have zero desire to put anything into fixed income until I'm a lot older.
What is a lot older in this instance? 45? 50? Or older?
Posted on 1/5/23 at 12:08 pm to thelawnwranglers
You are asking about timing the market. several decades of data shows not to do it.
Posted on 1/5/23 at 12:20 pm to notsince98
quote:
You are asking about timing the market. several decades of data shows not to do it.
Some what but if I was in a target funds they would reallocate periodically to achieve target asset allocation. So really asset allocation then timing question
Posted on 1/5/23 at 12:22 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
Some what but if I was in a target funds they would reallocate periodically to achieve target asset allocation. So really asset allocation then timing question
Time based asset allocations are not related to timing the market. Completely different.
The OP asked "is this the bottom?" That isn't asset allocation based on a retirement time period. That is a question about when to change investments based on the market and not a timeline.
Posted on 1/5/23 at 12:23 pm to thelawnwranglers
No, you are asking a market timing question. Asset allocation funds do not market time. They move funds around based on age not market conditions.
ETA: A minute late.
ETA: A minute late.
This post was edited on 1/5/23 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 1/5/23 at 12:30 pm to thelawnwranglers
This will look like the top in a couple months
Posted on 1/5/23 at 12:30 pm to thelawnwranglers
35% is way tooo high for your age.
Fixed income has too much downside risk should rates continue climb
Fixed income has too much downside risk should rates continue climb
Posted on 1/5/23 at 12:30 pm to TDTOM
So let me redirect
65/35 seems conservative
65/35 seems conservative
Posted on 1/5/23 at 12:32 pm to KillTheGophers
quote:
Fixed income has too much downside risk should rates continue climb
Nothing more than a year all with YTM greater than 4%
I have some stuff releasing in March. So I will not sell early be market timer
Posted on 1/5/23 at 12:34 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
65/35 seems conservative
Probably unless you are really timid. Although I think bonds are setting themselves up to be fairly attractive on an appreciation basis. This is only my opinion, but I think we are much closer to the top of rates than the bottom. Again, everything I say is only my idiotic opinion.
Posted on 1/5/23 at 12:40 pm to TDTOM
quote:
Probably unless you are really timid.
I used to be 100% equity never understood bond funds. Once I learned how to buy them myself game changer. I am just trying to eek out 8% a year. 35% at guaranteed 4% takes away my upside but seems like a good step forward.
I guess this will work itself out as my bonds mature I can redeploy based on circumstances
Posted on 1/5/23 at 1:45 pm to TigerTatorTots
quote:Statistically, that 2% might as well be zero.
I'm behind you at 34 and have maybe 2% in fixed income through a target date fund in my 401k.
That's silliness from the Fund Manager.
Possibly there's a requirement from his higher-ups or procedurally to be able to access those investments going forward to maintain some (albeit tiny) stake in them.
Posted on 1/5/23 at 1:59 pm to soccerfüt
quote:
Statistically, that 2% might as well be zero.
Probably cash to pay fees or something. I doubt it is 2% in intermediate term bonds.
Posted on 1/5/23 at 3:55 pm to thelawnwranglers
I bought Microsoft today
Posted on 1/5/23 at 4:13 pm to soccerfüt
Target date fund is 10% bonds but it is 2% of my entire portfolio. I redirected my 401k contributions to other investments when I learned more about finances
Posted on 1/5/23 at 7:05 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:FWIW, an old adage is you should invest a bond percentage similar in number to your age. Bond ROI has been so poor for 10-15 years that folks have fallen away from traditionaL recs.
65/35 seems conservative
Popular
Back to top
5










