Started By
Message

Quick Look at the Croatia vs. Belgium offside

Posted on 12/1/22 at 10:04 am
Posted by Bottom9
Arsenal Til I Die
Member since Jul 2010
21808 posts
Posted on 12/1/22 at 10:04 am
Holy shite. Embarrassing. Fitting that a Premier League ref Anthony Taylor is the ref with a millimeter offside call. The Croatian player's very end of the shirt is offside. fricking stupid decision. It negated a penalty attempt.





This post was edited on 12/1/22 at 10:06 am
Posted by Golgi Apparatus
Member since Sep 2009
2555 posts
Posted on 12/1/22 at 10:13 am to
Yea something has to be done after this World Cup. It’s affecting games.

I’ll argue that line is incredibly subjective as well and open to abuse.
This post was edited on 12/1/22 at 10:14 am
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160105 posts
Posted on 12/1/22 at 10:15 am to
That is absolutely not offside. That is not the point of the rule. fricking fix it.
Posted by RTN
Member since Oct 2016
779 posts
Posted on 12/1/22 at 10:17 am to
I thought it was number 9 they were looking at as offsides, so that VAR replay really threw me off.
Posted by Alyosha
Member since Nov 2020
6831 posts
Posted on 12/1/22 at 10:27 am to
And I welcomed our VAR overloads with open arms as an accountability system to FIFA corrupt match fixing. Boy how I was wrong not taking into the consideration the mispurpose-ing of VAR.
Posted by patchesohoulihan_007
Member since Jul 2015
2065 posts
Posted on 12/1/22 at 10:50 am to
Lukaku has big money on Croatia going through
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164339 posts
Posted on 12/1/22 at 11:01 am to
Garbage. Another example of why it should be where the feet are
This post was edited on 12/1/22 at 11:05 am
Posted by TFS4E
Washington DC
Member since Nov 2008
13266 posts
Posted on 12/1/22 at 11:07 am to
At this point I’m all for the hockey interpretation (or football illegal forward pass) if any goal scoring part is onside then you are onside. I also think that interpretation will lead to more goals which isn’t really a bad thing for the game.
This post was edited on 12/1/22 at 11:08 am
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82060 posts
Posted on 12/1/22 at 11:09 am to
I do not understand the outrage at all.
It's 100% better than having a ref decide what is offside and what isn't.
As long as the technology is fined tuned, I'm OK with it.
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
6778 posts
Posted on 12/1/22 at 11:21 am to
A whole thread of people that still dont understand the game.

They didnt call offside on #5. The offside ruling was that #9 (who is well offsides) was close enough that he interfered with the play. That was made obvious when the ref had to go to the monitor. If they were just trying to determine if #5 was offside the ref would not have needed to go to monitor as that's automated.
This post was edited on 12/1/22 at 11:22 am
Posted by volnavy
Fair wind and following seas
Member since Jan 2009
748 posts
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:08 pm to
Isn't where number 9 is, what they should be comparing against?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram