- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: McCarthy: I WILL NOT ALLOW Adam Schiff or Eric Swalwell on House Intelligence Committee
Posted on 11/20/22 at 7:33 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 11/20/22 at 7:33 pm to AggieHank86
Keep waiting, pedophile
0
Posted on 11/20/22 at 8:06 pm to Nono
quote:
Team D will still get the information out.
Absolutely…they have no decorum nor morals. I think that’s pretty much a blanket statement for ALL of them circa 2022.
Posted on 11/20/22 at 8:08 pm to Jjdoc
Good for him ... I think that may have been the very first thing I did ... before I started an investigation into Swalwell and his Chinese lady friend.
Posted on 11/20/22 at 8:12 pm to Texaggie96
quote:
Swalwell I can see, but telling the Democrats they can't nominate Schiff probably isn't going to go over well.
Historically each party has allowed the other to nominate their own to committee seats. Curious to see if McCarthy would break longstanding tradition on this. It could have pretty nasty repercussions if it gets weaponized
laughs in Marjorie Taylor Greene
Posted on 11/20/22 at 8:17 pm to Texaggie96
quote:
Historically each party has allowed the other to nominate their own to committee seats. Curious to see if McCarthy would break longstanding tradition on this. It could have pretty nasty repercussions if it gets weaponized.
That ship sailed when Pelosi excluded people like Jordan from the Jan 6 committee. Just like Harry Reid, she didn’t worry about the long term repercussions.
Posted on 11/20/22 at 8:53 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
You are simply too fricking stupid to grasp that a story hour is not the same as a drag show.
Just wow… so you are advocating for drag queens to dress up in their drag show attire and read a story of their choosing to children under 10…
You are one sick perverted person.
Posted on 11/20/22 at 8:58 pm to dafif
quote:Advocating for it? No.
so you are advocating for drag queens to dress up in their drag show attire and read a story of their choosing to children under 10…
But it does not bother me, either, for parents to have the option of letting their own children attend.
By contrast, you want to deprive parents of the right to make these decisions for themselves and their children, in favor of a uniform rule from the nanny state. Good for you, I suppose.
Posted on 11/20/22 at 9:00 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
By contrast, you want to deprive parents of the right to make these decisions for themselves and their children
We’re just sticklers for what’s right. Yes, I do want to deprive parents of exposing children to perversion.
It’s called sexual abuse of children hank. Not surprised an old queen like yourself is incapable of distinguishing right from wrong.
This post was edited on 11/20/22 at 9:01 pm
Posted on 11/20/22 at 9:03 pm to BugAC
quote:I don’t think it’s any of my damned business to make those decisions for another parent and that parent’s child.
Not surprised an old queen like yourself is incapable of distinguishing right from wrong.
By contrast, you’re very comfortable imposing your will upon others and their children.
That’s called authoritarianism. You seem to be comfortable with it. Good for you.
quote:Not by any sane or statutory definition in any jurisdiction of which I am aware. Only in your little Victorian mind.
It is called sexual abuse of children hank.
This post was edited on 11/20/22 at 9:05 pm
Posted on 11/20/22 at 9:11 pm to Texaggie96
quote:
Curious to see if McCarthy would break longstanding tradition on this. It could have pretty nasty repercussions if it gets weaponized.
Like when Pelosi wouldn’t allow Jim Jordan on the Jan 6 committee? Pelosi shat on tradition so eff them
Posted on 11/20/22 at 9:26 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
y contrast, you’re very comfortable imposing your will upon others and their children. That’s called authoritarianism. You seem to be comfortable with it. Good for you.
Yes, sexual deviancy towards children warrants the force of law to stop them. I’m as much as an authoritarian when it comes to grooming as I am when I want police to lock up murderers. Living in a free society doesn’t mean you are absolved from being a child predator. You still have to act like a human if you want to be a part of civilization.
quote:
Not by any sane or statutory definition in any jurisdiction of which I am aware. Only in your little Victorian mind.
Lol, you’re still pretending to be a lawyer? Morality and law often are not aligned. But I also don’t need a law degree to know that exposing children to pedophiles is wrong and you are subhuman trash if you think otherwise.
This post was edited on 11/20/22 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 11/20/22 at 9:32 pm to Texaggie96
quote:
Swalwell I can see, but telling the Democrats they can't nominate Schiff probably isn't going to go over well.
Historically each party has allowed the other to nominate their own to committee seats. Curious to see if McCarthy would break longstanding tradition on this. It could have pretty nasty repercussions if it gets weaponized.
Nah, frick all that. After the damage Pelosi has done as speaker and letting her minions run roughshod along the way? The next speaker should go nuclear. I don't trust McCarthy to do it. Seeing is believing if those two turds are left off the house intel committee.
Posted on 11/21/22 at 10:51 am to AggieHank86
quote:
y contrast, you want to deprive parents of the right to make these decisions for themselves and their children, in favor of a uniform rule from the nanny state. Good for you, I suppose.
Thank you for confirming that the state has no interest in the welfare of a child.
I’m sure you know how ridiculous your positions are or you are not smart enough to comprehend your positions
Posted on 11/21/22 at 11:30 am to Texaggie96
quote:
Historically each party has allowed the other to nominate their own to committee seats. Curious to see if McCarthy would break longstanding tradition on this. It could have pretty nasty repercussions if it gets weaponized.
Good grief. Try to keep up here. Pelosi is the Speaker who broke long standing tradition on this. Remember when she barred MTG? Pelosi weaponized this whole thing with barring MTG and refusing to allow the Republicans to appoint their chosen members to the Jan. 6 committee. You Democrats are such lying and deceitful people that you are a curse on our country.
Posted on 11/21/22 at 11:32 am to AggieHank86
quote:
You know better than posting a pragmatic analysis here.
Perhaps you would feel more at home on another message board, surrounded by your supposed intellectual peers.
Absolutely no one will mourn your leaving.
Posted on 11/21/22 at 11:33 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Yes, you are obviously a wonderful person and model citizen.
No, he is blunt and honest.
You disguise your hate and disdain with word salad.
You are no better.
Posted on 11/21/22 at 11:34 am to BFIV
I’ve confirmed that she is a cowardly, yellow-bellied communist.
I thought she was just a misinformed dumbass but her posting proves otherwise
I thought she was just a misinformed dumbass but her posting proves otherwise
Posted on 11/21/22 at 11:36 am to oogabooga68
quote:
he is blunt and honest.
That’s because I’m in medical device sales. You have to be blunt and honest, lol
Posted on 11/21/22 at 11:55 am to Jjdoc
Doesn't the full House vote on the membership for Standing Committees?
Posted on 11/21/22 at 11:57 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I don’t think it’s any of my damned business to make those decisions for another parent and that parent’s child.
Wait, didn't you claim to be a Family Law Attorney?
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News