- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UPDATE: Idaho Murders Thread (Links inside)
Posted on 1/7/23 at 6:27 pm to OysterPoBoy
Posted on 1/7/23 at 6:27 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:
My money’s on Taco Bell.
New York Johnnys baw
0
Posted on 1/7/23 at 6:31 pm to AUWDE
quote:
Wrong.
They can compel the court to enforce her compliance, and since she was used in the probable cause affidavit you can bet your arse the court will enforce it.
Can’t speak to legal process, but I know human nature.
If the defense goes after Dylan aggressively, I can’t imagine it will go over well with the jury.
Posted on 1/7/23 at 6:35 pm to TrueTigerTale
quote:If he did it intentionally, i would assume it would be in the hope that he'd be caught, unless he used something to contaminate it. If I'm committing a quad homicide, the only things I want to leave at the scene are corpses, not anything that could be tied back to me.
That would be a reason for leaving the sheath by their bodies.
Posted on 1/7/23 at 6:37 pm to TrueTigerTale
quote:
That would be a reason for leaving the sheath by their bodies.
Dude, no.
You honestly think he intentionally left behind the single biggest piece of evidence against him? This dude is a criminology major and PHd student that's taken a deep fascination in the 'how' and 'why' criminals escape detection or get caught. No way he's intentionally leaving something like that behind, even if it says "USMC" on it. That's just asinine
You're reaching Baldona levels with this take. I have no idea why people feel the need to make their own random dumb ideas fit the circumstances just to feel like they've come up with some "outside of the box" new detail that cracks the case.
And with your weird sentence structure and grammar, I still have no idea what point you're trying to make about previous "bad interactions" with couples and BK's thinking
This post was edited on 1/7/23 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 1/7/23 at 6:38 pm to TrueTigerTale
Oh for fricks sake. Hopefully chicken tells you to kick rocks too.
No matter how much planning, no matter how smart you are, no matter how much you practiced you will never be ready for the real thing. Remember how you beat your meat in preparation for that first piece of arse. You fantasized about, dreamed how it go. Then finally when you were 44 someone gave you some. You nutted in 3 seconds, had convulsions and forgot where you were. Yeah, same thing happened to this guy.
No matter how much planning, no matter how smart you are, no matter how much you practiced you will never be ready for the real thing. Remember how you beat your meat in preparation for that first piece of arse. You fantasized about, dreamed how it go. Then finally when you were 44 someone gave you some. You nutted in 3 seconds, had convulsions and forgot where you were. Yeah, same thing happened to this guy.
Posted on 1/7/23 at 6:38 pm to TrueTigerTale
quote:
DA is still searching for a motive
My theory, he doesn’t have one directly tied to these specific victims. I think they were chosen at random for a specific reason we don’t know yet. I think he did search them out, but I do not think he had any personal relationship to any of them and I don’t think one was a target and the others just happened to be there.
This case has a lot of Ted Bundy type vibes for me. And again, its just my theory, but I think this guy had some tendencies and after all his work in criminology, etc decided to act on them.
Posted on 1/7/23 at 6:45 pm to AUWDE
quote:
My theory, he doesn’t have one directly tied to these specific victims.
Well after his arrest one of the girls fathers said they were finding connections he had to them. Nothing official yet, but I’d say it’s very likely there was something there.
Posted on 1/7/23 at 6:45 pm to CrimsonTideMD
quote:
If the defense goes after Dylan aggressively, I can’t imagine it will go over well with the jury
Defense doesn’t have to be aggressive with her to discredit her. A good attorney will have the skill to question her in a way that she discredits herself.
Posted on 1/7/23 at 6:51 pm to TrueTigerTale
quote:
During his criminology classes, do you think he learned how hard it was to identify attackers dressed this way?
Like how he learned about cell phone pings?
Posted on 1/7/23 at 6:51 pm to geauxjo
quote:
Well after his arrest one of the girls fathers said they were finding connections he had to them.
The only one that has spoke out regarding possible connections is Steve Goncalves, and he did not say they had found connections between them….he said they were LOOKING and he would be surprised if it was someone that knew her.
LINK
Posted on 1/7/23 at 7:00 pm to TrueTigerTale
quote:
DA is still searching for a motive
I suggested early on that he was seduced by the very subject he studied. I don’t think he had a specific reason to kill
These people. He just got consumed by murder and these poor souls were his victims.
Posted on 1/7/23 at 7:00 pm to geauxjo
That's a Daily Mail article that also states he taunted guards and said he'd cut them. I wouldn't take that article very seriously.
Posted on 1/7/23 at 7:03 pm to Saintsisit
quote:
Saintsisit
I think that specific aspect was accurately reported but found the female quoted was incorrect about the person making the statements while incarcerated. The fathers quote is still in play.
Posted on 1/7/23 at 7:04 pm to AUWDE
quote:
They can compel the court to enforce her compliance, and since she was used in the probable cause affidavit you can bet your arse the court will enforce it.
Please stop with this. Some of you guys are so far off in the weeds regarding this girl that it’s detailing the thread. The police did not compel or ask either witness to submit to a toxicology test. Why would they? There’s no reason for it. This idea that the defense is going to compel her to submit to one months later is equally absurd. A toxicology test done today would have absolutely zero bearing on her state of mind the night of the murders. There is no need to continue on page after page about something that has no bearing in reality on the case
Posted on 1/7/23 at 7:06 pm to Flair Chops
quote:
If he did it intentionally, i would assume it would be in the hope that he'd be caught
I'm not convinced he didnt. Sounds like he left a lot of clues.
Posted on 1/7/23 at 7:07 pm to AUWDE
quote:
Defense doesn’t have to be aggressive with her to discredit her. A good attorney will have the skill to question her in a way that she discredits herself.
And he has a public defender. A lot of people in this thread are acting like he's got OJ's "dream team" and the Rodney King beating on his side.
Sure, some sleazeball attorney may end up representing him for the publicity/attention. But, for now, he has a public defender and a shitload of evidence(with more almost definitely to come) going against him.
Posted on 1/7/23 at 7:16 pm to tigerinthebueche
quote:
I suggested early on that he was seduced by the very subject he studied. I don’t think he had a specific reason to kill These people. He just got consumed by murder and these poor souls were his victims.
Go back to what I posted earlier. As a student researcher at DeSales university, he conducted research where he interviewed criminals about their behavior before and after their crimes. After the murders he began posting questions under the name Pappa Rodgers in a FB forum about the murders. Someone posted the DeSales questions side by side with his group questions in the forum. They are nearly identical with some of them being almost word for word.
Why would a guy seemingly pull question after question from his previous research and begin asking them in a public forum? My worthless opinion is because the sick frick was still conducting research. He was simply conducting it from the criminals point of view. It’s bizarrely twisted but it’s all there in black and white. He purposely became his own research because what better way to understand criminal behavior than to become one.
Posted on 1/7/23 at 7:26 pm to geauxjo
You realize the Newsweek article is more current and also has actual quotes from Goncalves?
But ok, we’ll trust your DailyMail article with zero quotes and vague statements, etc because they are a bastion of journalism
But ok, we’ll trust your DailyMail article with zero quotes and vague statements, etc because they are a bastion of journalism
Posted on 1/7/23 at 7:26 pm to AUWDE
I was originally thinking he met them at the restaurant they worked at, or the beer place next door. I don't now, because I don't think he would drive 10 miles, drink, and take a chance on a DUI, while trying to garner employment with the local LEO's.
I also don't think the restaurant would buy new cookware and utensils for him, so the spirit or essence of meat, or whatever, would not offend him.
I just think he stayed closer to Pullman for food and drink, to creep out people over there. I think he met them on an infrequent trip over, or found them online, and stalked them, growing a relationship that existed in his mind. When he could learn no more aboot them online, he began stalking them IRL.
I also don't think the restaurant would buy new cookware and utensils for him, so the spirit or essence of meat, or whatever, would not offend him.
I just think he stayed closer to Pullman for food and drink, to creep out people over there. I think he met them on an infrequent trip over, or found them online, and stalked them, growing a relationship that existed in his mind. When he could learn no more aboot them online, he began stalking them IRL.
Page 137 of 180
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News