- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/20/22 at 4:31 pm to keakar
Not sure that’s true about men unless I’m shooting darts, boys!
Posted on 8/20/22 at 4:49 pm to ChEgrad
quote:
hard to believe it's completely without risk to pregnancy. Known effects to menstrual cycles
This!
It's not leading to 40% of shite.
But, I'd be shocked if it doesn't elevate risk to a certain degree.
Posted on 8/20/22 at 4:55 pm to Privateer 2007
Some of y’all need to step away from the computer for a bit. You see a Twitter post that affirms your world view and just run with it. Someone asked for a link to the study supporting this person’s outrageous claims and they got downvoted into oblivion.
Posted on 8/20/22 at 5:13 pm to Tigers0918
quote:
you can't just make up things and say them as truth. But I guess you know your audience, so it will probably work.
Posted on 8/20/22 at 5:13 pm to DumpsterFire
Why would anyone spend a second of their time trying to educate a vax defender playing the “interested role” when that same beta moron can’t simply Google “Data, Pfizer, 44%, miscarriages, vaccine” for themselves?
Try Googling: “Go, frick, yourself”.
Try Googling: “Go, frick, yourself”.
Posted on 8/20/22 at 5:16 pm to DumpsterFire
quote:
Some of y’all need to step away from the computer for a bit. You see a Twitter post that affirms your world view and just run with it. Someone asked for a link to the study supporting this person’s outrageous claims and they got downvoted into oblivion.
What do downvotes matter? Weird that’s suits give a shite about a cute up or down by people they’ll never meet.
But to your argument, yeah, I’m mostly onboard with you about how easily swayed people are these days. Which leads me to ask you - were you as skeptical about all the Covid hype from the CDC, medical industry and governments? Or did you buy into all their bullshite?
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:08 pm to BurntOrangeMan
I googled Pfizer Covid vaccine and miscarriages and all I got was trials saying no difference.
I’m legitimately interested in that data.
I’m not ashamed to admit that I was encouraged by the early data though there was some holes in the original data (low overall incidence of disease even in the control population) and got the first two shots.
After still getting Covid I have not given one thought to getting a booster and skeptical of any positive trials that have gotten put out since
I’m legitimately interested in that data.
I’m not ashamed to admit that I was encouraged by the early data though there was some holes in the original data (low overall incidence of disease even in the control population) and got the first two shots.
After still getting Covid I have not given one thought to getting a booster and skeptical of any positive trials that have gotten put out since
This post was edited on 8/20/22 at 6:10 pm
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:11 pm to Wednesday
If this were the case wouldn't the birth rate have dropped substantially?
It went down about 8% in 2020 and then came back to 2019 levels in 2021.
It went down about 8% in 2020 and then came back to 2019 levels in 2021.
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:12 pm to BayouBlitz
It’s Pfizer’s own data from its adverse events listing they have to give to the FDA.
Correlation isn’t causation. Average miscarriage rate is approximately 20 percent. In this population 44 percent had miscarriages.
It’s possible there’s some other explanation. But Pfizer is just not answering questions about it.
And they should be.
They’re just saying “the vaccine didn’t cause these ladies to have miscarriages.” It’s twice the normal rate. How exactly did they rule that out? They haven’t said. But if it’s their own data, I would say that’s fairly irresponsible for Pfizer not to ask itself internally. But you can avoid doing so if you can make trillions of dollars of Gvt money and be immune from your frickups I guess. It’s good to be the king.
I got the shot so I could travel. I’m not doing it again. Too many unknowns and risks for absolutely zero reward. If it worked, it would have worked.
Pfizer’s FDA data is somewhere over 3000 pages long. You can read it if you want.
Summary with link to download the 4000 pages
Article reviewing results
News article by John Solomon where they just didn’t respond.
John Solomon Article
Correlation isn’t causation. Average miscarriage rate is approximately 20 percent. In this population 44 percent had miscarriages.
It’s possible there’s some other explanation. But Pfizer is just not answering questions about it.
And they should be.
They’re just saying “the vaccine didn’t cause these ladies to have miscarriages.” It’s twice the normal rate. How exactly did they rule that out? They haven’t said. But if it’s their own data, I would say that’s fairly irresponsible for Pfizer not to ask itself internally. But you can avoid doing so if you can make trillions of dollars of Gvt money and be immune from your frickups I guess. It’s good to be the king.
I got the shot so I could travel. I’m not doing it again. Too many unknowns and risks for absolutely zero reward. If it worked, it would have worked.
Pfizer’s FDA data is somewhere over 3000 pages long. You can read it if you want.
Summary with link to download the 4000 pages
Article reviewing results
News article by John Solomon where they just didn’t respond.
John Solomon Article
This post was edited on 8/20/22 at 6:13 pm
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:13 pm to Privateer 2007
quote:
It's not leading to 40% of shite.
But, I'd be shocked if it doesn't elevate risk to a certain degree.
There is zero question. Every viral vaccine has an effect on reproduction metrics.
So do viral infections. This has been known for decades.
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:15 pm to jonnyanony
Dunno - All I’m saying is, I could get hit by a bus, or shot walking down the street in Baton Rouge tomorrow. I’ll take my chances with catching a cold.
I see no benefit to the Covid vaccine for anyone except Pfizer
I see no benefit to the Covid vaccine for anyone except Pfizer
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:17 pm to Adam Banks
quote:You asked for facts to back up some ridiculous claim from the OP. You know that nothing backs that up. A 44% miscarriage rate would be headline news.
I asked for a link to the study and all I got was 4 down votes.
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:18 pm to Adam Banks
It’s Pfizer’s data from the FDA.
You’ll find a bunch of right wing articles of varying degrees of credible nature and uniformly left wing sources saying it’s all a conspiracy.
There’s something deeply wrong with the shots.
The heart problems in healthy young men is the scariest shite to me.
I’ll take my chances with the cold built in Chy-Na
You’ll find a bunch of right wing articles of varying degrees of credible nature and uniformly left wing sources saying it’s all a conspiracy.
There’s something deeply wrong with the shots.
The heart problems in healthy young men is the scariest shite to me.
I’ll take my chances with the cold built in Chy-Na
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:18 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
I googled Pfizer Covid vaccine and miscarriages and all I got was trials saying no difference.
Congrats, you are a moron who can’t follow specific directions. Cut & paste is over your pay grade apparently.
This post was edited on 8/20/22 at 6:19 pm
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:20 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
. A 44% miscarriage rate would be headline news.
Democrats
It’s Pfizer’s own data. And miraculously it’s not headline news
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:22 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
A 44% miscarriage rate would be headline news.
On the same stations that are subsidized by big pharma?
Maybe the Globalists are right, some of the population is beyond dumb & needed to be culled.
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:23 pm to Wednesday
quote:
44% miscarriage rate Flg :Vaccine
Wait a minute….so you believe nearly half of all vaccinated pregnant women are having their pregnancies end in miscarriage? Do you guys ever stop to think before posting?
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:26 pm to onmymedicalgrind
44% of the women in Pfizer’s trial/adverse events listing had miscarriages, by Pfizer’s own data.
You got a medical grind explanation for that? Pfizer hasn’t really answered any questions about it so it would be nice to hear whatever they shifted the goalposts to say.
You got a medical grind explanation for that? Pfizer hasn’t really answered any questions about it so it would be nice to hear whatever they shifted the goalposts to say.
Posted on 8/20/22 at 6:30 pm to Wednesday
Ok so I reviewed what you placed and it is in regards to the 50 women in the original trial. Given the mass roll out of the vaccine there should be a much much larger sample size at this point of women who got the vaccine and then became pregnant.
Where is the follow up?
Where is the follow up?
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News