- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
La. representative proposes bill to allow pregnant mothers to collect child support
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:09 am
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:09 am
MSN.com
quote:
There’s a potential plan that would allow pregnant mothers to collect child support before the baby is born. S. Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA) introduced the Unborn Child Support Act. The bill would give mothers the ability to receive child support payments while they are pregnant. “Life begins at conception, and this bill is a straightforward first step towards updating our federal laws to reflect that fact. We are hopeful that Democrats will join this bicameral effort to provide mothers with child support payments while their child is in the womb,” said Rep. Johnson. The Unborn Child Support Act allows a court, in consultation with the mother, to award child support payments while the child is still in the womb and retroactively up to the point of conception as determined by a physician. Some parents believe this will help moms with the financial burden that comes before a baby is born. “The father of the child is just as responsible as the mother is,” Diana Quiett said.
9
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:10 am to Revelator
This won't be abused at all!
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:10 am to Revelator
Ice cream and pickles ain’t cheap.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:11 am to Revelator
Quite the pickle for dems with this one 
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:11 am to Revelator
I wonder if this is a play to get the court to let the abortion trigger law go into effect.
I'm not sure how I feel about it if so. Need to think on it more.
I'm not sure how I feel about it if so. Need to think on it more.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:12 am to Revelator
now do claiming dependent on taxes(even if miscarried).
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:14 am to Revelator
How do you prove paternity? If the father denies paternity, what happens?
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:14 am to Tigers0918
quote:
miscarried
Yea this is where trouble comes in.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:15 am to Revelator
Goose-Gander situation.
If the fetus is a "child," and the pregnant woman is deprived of the ability to terminate the pregnancy, is the male any LESS responsible for pregnancy costs than he is for child-rearing costs?
If the fetus is a "child," and the pregnant woman is deprived of the ability to terminate the pregnancy, is the male any LESS responsible for pregnancy costs than he is for child-rearing costs?
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:16 am to Revelator
quote:
pregnant mothers
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:17 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Quite the pickle for dems with this one
The two button meme should be good.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:17 am to BobBoucher
quote:PROBABLY wait until it is possible to do genetic testing and then make the payments retroactive to the date of conception (or whatever the earliest date for "support" is implemented by the Legislature)
How do you prove paternity? If the father denies paternity, what happens?
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:18 am to AggieHank86
I’m good with this. The only problem is that she has full custody. You have to allow me 1 30 minute visit a week. I’ll get as close as I can.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:19 am to BobBoucher
quote:
How do you prove paternity? If the father denies paternity, what happens?
Believe all women.
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:26 am to Malik Agar
quote:
This won't be abused at all!
That isn’t the point
quote:
Life begins at conception, and this bill is a straightforward first step towards updating our federal laws to reflect that fact. We are hopeful that Democrats will join this bicameral effort to provide mothers with child support payments while their child is in the womb,” said Rep. Johnson.
He’s using the democrats love of expanding welfare/assistance to force them into saying it’s a baby.
It’s a lose lose for democrats. If they support it, they say life begins at contraception and are at odds with their abortion beliefs.
If they don’t support it, then they are telling poor expecting mothers they don’t deserve assistance yet.
This post was edited on 7/21/22 at 11:27 am
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:28 am to Revelator
quote:
There’s a potential plan that would allow pregnant mothers to collect child support before the baby is born. S. Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA) introduced the Unborn Child Support Act.
so they collect payments for 8 months from 6 different guys they say is daddy, then kill the baby at abortion clinic across state lines, baby sold to medical reseller of baby parts, no baby not paternity test possible so no one can sue to get money back cause its not their baby
sounds like they figured out a great new fraud scheme for whores
Posted on 7/21/22 at 11:29 am to AggieHank86
quote:
is the male any LESS responsible for pregnancy costs than he is for child-rearing costs?
I don't believe he is
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News