- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/6/22 at 3:51 pm to cahoots
I would say 17 weeks would be a fair cutoff. After that abortion should only be a lifesaving measure. 80% of miscarriages occur in the first trimester
Posted on 5/6/22 at 3:51 pm to sgallo3
No. You fricking frick.
Posted on 5/6/22 at 3:53 pm to sgallo3
quote:
I also realize that my feelings about it are not strong enough that they override the person making that decision's.
quote:
I would say 17 weeks would be a fair cutoff.
Back to Reddit.
This post was edited on 5/6/22 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 5/6/22 at 3:54 pm to Flats
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/6/22 at 3:59 pm
Posted on 5/6/22 at 3:55 pm to cahoots
quote:
Then what is the best cutoff? People keep saying conception but how in the hell are you going to even attempt to enforce that?
I'm laughing at his contradictions, made just several minutes apart.
Posted on 5/6/22 at 3:59 pm to cahoots
quote:
People keep saying conception but how in the hell are you going to even attempt to enforce that?
They have no actual answers, only holier than art thou self-righteous indignation.
When the government starts going through their mail to make sure it doesnt contain abortion pills they will scream about their rights.
Posted on 5/6/22 at 4:08 pm to sgallo3
Stupid take. It's like asking if murder being illegal blurs the lines of church and state because of the Ten Commandments.
Posted on 5/6/22 at 4:19 pm to sgallo3
quote:
enforced unfairly.
What's unfair is having a handful of people make a federal law on the subject without any input from the people.
What's fair is kicking it to the states and allowing the people to vote on the subject.
Posted on 5/6/22 at 4:20 pm to sgallo3
quote:
Who said anything about banning sex?
Your analogy did when you responded to a guy discussing drinking and driving, and you said: quote:
I support your freedom to make that choice and would be against a law banning alcohol
Again, your IQ is probably in the 80s
Posted on 5/6/22 at 4:21 pm to sgallo3
quote:
Does making abortion criminal blur the lines of church and state?
Boy you guys are just throwing everything up against the wall to see what sticks, aren't you?
Posted on 5/6/22 at 4:25 pm to sgallo3
quote:
Aborted children wouldnt be for or against anything.
Nobody murdered are for or against anything.
Posted on 5/6/22 at 4:33 pm to moneyg
quote:
Nobody murdered are for or against anything.
They could have a stance before they were murdered. The problem with your assumption is an aborted fetus never had the ability to consider any stances.
Also i find a major flaw in your statement that 100% of aborted fetuses wouldve been against abortion. Out of the millions of fetuses that are aborted we can be fairly certain a percentage of them wouldve committed suicide (aka aborted themselves)
Posted on 5/6/22 at 4:36 pm to sgallo3
quote:
We can reliably determine that among the non-religious there is clear majority support for pro-choice.
So if we can get the “majority” to poll in favor of murder not being a crime, will is that ok?
What a clown argument.
Posted on 5/6/22 at 4:37 pm to sgallo3
quote:
Also i find a major flaw in your statement that 100% of aborted fetuses wouldve been against abortion
How can you say otherwise?
quote:
Out of the millions of fetuses that are aborted we can be fairly certain a percentage of them wouldve committed suicide (aka aborted themselves)
This is an awful argument.
Should population control crazies just look at suicide rates and go around killing X amount of children because the probability of them doing it themselves was very high?
Posted on 5/6/22 at 4:37 pm to RebelExpress38
quote:
So if we can get the “majority” to poll in favor of murder not being a crime, will is that ok?
You'll have to show me the Supreme Court case that ruled that murder is a civil right.
Posted on 5/6/22 at 4:38 pm to dkreller
quote:
This is an awful argument.
Should population control crazies just look at suicide rates and go around killing X amount of children because the probability of them doing it themselves was very high?
False premise.
Posted on 5/6/22 at 4:39 pm to sgallo3
quote:
You'll have to show me the Supreme Court case that ruled that murder is a civil right.
So if this decision gets published then you have no complaints, right?
Posted on 5/6/22 at 4:40 pm to Flats
quote:
So if this decision gets published then you have no complaints, right?
I will think it is wrong but if the supreme court rules it to be so there is no appeal to be made besides revolution.
Also will need to see your hypothetical vote where the majority of non religiously-biased people are in favor of murder being legal.
This post was edited on 5/6/22 at 4:42 pm
Posted on 5/6/22 at 4:43 pm to sgallo3
quote:
False premise
you just used the same thing to point out a "major flaw" in his argument
Page 7 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News