- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Amateur photo of the Andromeda Galaxy
Posted on 4/8/22 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 4/8/22 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 4/8/22 at 5:37 pm to LSUDVM1999
I've seen better galaxies in the quad.
Posted on 4/8/22 at 5:37 pm to Salviati
quote:
I've seen better galaxies in the quad
In a few million years that galaxy will be in the quad.
Posted on 4/8/22 at 5:42 pm to LegendInMyMind
a vintage photo of the Ford Galaxy
Posted on 4/8/22 at 5:44 pm to LSUDVM1999
How many light years to cross that thing?
I’m charging my EV now.
I’m charging my EV now.
Posted on 4/8/22 at 5:48 pm to Turf Taint
quote:
How many light years to cross that thing?
200,000
Posted on 4/8/22 at 6:54 pm to LSUDVM1999
Pics of the Klingons near Uranus?
Posted on 4/8/22 at 7:33 pm to LSUDVM1999
Here's my pic of Andromeda, I did a shitty job of
framing it up, cut the top out...
framing it up, cut the top out...
Posted on 4/8/22 at 7:44 pm to MLSter
quote:
This is so fake.
Exactly. Everyone knows the earth is flat.
Posted on 4/8/22 at 7:47 pm to MikeBRLA
Deep down they do.
Devil lies and makes them think other wise.
Lies like ...we are on spinning ball traveling a bagillion mph in an every expanding explosion that started from nothing
Devil lies and makes them think other wise.
Lies like ...we are on spinning ball traveling a bagillion mph in an every expanding explosion that started from nothing
Posted on 4/8/22 at 7:51 pm to MLSter
This is a comment from the guy who took the “picture”
there are a lot of variables to acquiring good data through a telescope. the telescope is attached to a camera, filter wheel and focuser all of which sits on a finely geared equatorial mount, necessary to track the stars within a high degree of precision over the course of many long exposures. the mount is also connected to a second smaller telescope and camera which actually tracks a target star and via a computer program sends commands to the mount to keep the star in the crosshairs. Two other programs run concurrently while imaging: a mount control interface and a sequencer which runs the imaging session: what target, how long, what gain setting, what filter, when to focus, how much to heat the dew heater to keep condensation off lenses. All these systems have to talk to each other for a session to run smoothly, and each of them has their own set of variables. On the rare clear, dark (no moon) night, everything has to run perfectly to get quality data, and acquisition is only part of creating an image. You also need to shoot calibration frames to compensate for optical aberration, noise from the camera and environment, etc. Once you have all the data you need, the second part, processing, has as least as many variables, as you’ve got to take all those 1s and 0s and transform them into a pleasing image. At any step of this process things can go wrong. Hope this helps!
Literally not a real photo
Computer rendition.
there are a lot of variables to acquiring good data through a telescope. the telescope is attached to a camera, filter wheel and focuser all of which sits on a finely geared equatorial mount, necessary to track the stars within a high degree of precision over the course of many long exposures. the mount is also connected to a second smaller telescope and camera which actually tracks a target star and via a computer program sends commands to the mount to keep the star in the crosshairs. Two other programs run concurrently while imaging: a mount control interface and a sequencer which runs the imaging session: what target, how long, what gain setting, what filter, when to focus, how much to heat the dew heater to keep condensation off lenses. All these systems have to talk to each other for a session to run smoothly, and each of them has their own set of variables. On the rare clear, dark (no moon) night, everything has to run perfectly to get quality data, and acquisition is only part of creating an image. You also need to shoot calibration frames to compensate for optical aberration, noise from the camera and environment, etc. Once you have all the data you need, the second part, processing, has as least as many variables, as you’ve got to take all those 1s and 0s and transform them into a pleasing image. At any step of this process things can go wrong. Hope this helps!
Literally not a real photo
Computer rendition.
Posted on 4/8/22 at 7:51 pm to MikeBRLA
quote:
Exactly. Everyone knows the earth is flat.
You better have some good brakes when you get to the edge...
Posted on 4/8/22 at 7:52 pm to LSUDVM1999
Here's my effort at Andromeda a few years ago:
Posted on 4/8/22 at 7:56 pm to JCinBAMA
Also also fake.
We aren’t on a disc floating in “space”
Space is a lie from the devil too.
We aren’t on a disc floating in “space”
Space is a lie from the devil too.
Posted on 4/8/22 at 7:59 pm to MLSter
Who are you, so wise in the ways of science?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News