Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 12/6/23 at 5:41 pm to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124591 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

spontaneously generated
---
Never said this, but again, you already know that.
Of course you did. The fixed assets were a cashless creation. No one paid for them.
Posted by facher08
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
4474 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

So after the invectives tossed this way by OT'ers, I am genuinely curious. What got to you? The fact you are petty as hell and got called on it, or the assumption you were a "dude"?



To recap, you failed to provide evidence that all of the $113 billion is cash, but rather backtracked saying it's really all cash. When I pointed out that it isn't really all cash, you are calling me petty because you either can't understand or refuse to accept simple accounting terms.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40233 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

The US has spent more on Ukraine than they have on all of their road and bridges


Point of clarification, are you talking about Ukrainian spending on roads or US spending on US roads?
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
1361 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 6:09 pm to
It’s because he has no principles and isn’t nearly as smart as he thinks he is.
Posted by facher08
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
4474 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

Of course you did. The fixed assets were a cashless creation. No one paid for them.


Of course, I didnt say that and in fact said the opposite below.

quote:

you are now trying to say it's all cash because it was all ONCE cash,


I'm not sure if you continue to dig this hole because you don't understand or you are just ideologically invested into your sunk-cost fallacy.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124591 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

facher08
So after the invectives tossed this way by OT'ers, I am genuinely curious. What got to you? The fact you are petty as hell and got called on it, or the assumption you were a "dude"?
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19991 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 6:11 pm to

quote:

What happens when a military vehicle goes out of commission? It likely ends up at the Sierra Army Depot, a military equipment storage facility located in Herlong, Calif. The massive 36,000-acre site houses thousands of tanks, trucks, and other combat vehicles. The facility’s officials want it known that the patch of land is not a military junkyard.

In a YouTube video from 2014, viewers are given a firsthand look at the massive military depot where an endless stream of combat vehicles are not only stored, but also offered a second life.


quote:

Don Olson, Deputy Commander at the depot, stresses that the purpose of the facility is to fix up military vehicles and even uniforms and other supplies that have seen combat. More than $1 billion worth of clothing has been shipped to the facility, along with 26,000 vehicles.

“If it can still shoot, roll, or otherwise function, Don and his team take it into inventory, fix it up and ship it right back out to troops,” the video’s presenter explains.





https://americanmilitarynews.com/2016/01/sierra-army-depot-the-worlds-largest-m1-abrams-tank-graveyard-video/
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124591 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

but rather backtracked saying it's really all cash
Link?
Posted by Scuttle But
Member since Nov 2023
1301 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 6:14 pm to
If it's cheaper to give Ukraine tanks and missiles than it is to dispose of them then why doesn't Ukraine have 1000 M1 tanks and 1000s of missiles?
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
9838 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

If it's cheaper to give Ukraine tanks and missiles than it is to dispose of them then why doesn't Ukraine have 1000 M1 tanks and 1000s of missiles?


Because Biden is more worried about his next ice cream cone.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19991 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

If it's cheaper to give Ukraine tanks and missiles than it is to dispose of them then why doesn't Ukraine have 1000 M1 tanks and 1000s of missiles?



It took 2 years for Ukraine to get 31 Abrams tanks and a handful of F16's. There is a lack of will and spine.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
18108 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 6:27 pm to
The Biden Administration tried to give Ukraine just barely enough for their offensive, because they wanted Ukraine to retake the South, and then they were going to push for a ceasefire. They tried to micromanage the war.

Just insane hubris.
Posted by facher08
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
4474 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

Link?


quote:

Message

Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict by NC_Tigah

quote:
More of a red herring since the total of amount given in cash was the point in question

I’m appalled we’ve given a penny in cash. But from our end, it’s all our cash


Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124591 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

facher08
Dude!
Posted by Scuttle But
Member since Nov 2023
1301 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 6:42 pm to
Do they have the F-16s in theater yet?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124591 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

Dude!
Whoops!
I meant "Poster" ... don't want to be accused of hurling insults at you again.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40233 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

it's cheaper to give Ukraine tanks and missiles than it is to dispose of them then why doesn't Ukraine have 1000 M1 tanks and 1000s of missiles?


1. The depleted uranium armor on most of the stored tanks is so highly classified that we don’t export it. The military is having to go through the stockpiles and find tanks that don’t have it or remove it from tanks in storage and replace it with the foreign export armor.

2. The Ukrainians have not been able to spare the maintenance ppl to send them for the training needed for the M1A1. The ones that they have been able to send were former T80 technicians which they could spare because they have not been able to replace all of their T80s.

3. The Leopard 1A5s that Europe have provided to Ukraine were taken out of the junkyard and restored for less than it cost to scrap them. They don’t have composite or depleted uranium armor and it’s still cheaper to give to Ukraine.
This post was edited on 12/6/23 at 7:00 pm
Posted by facher08
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
4474 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

Dude!


I'm glad you've decided against perpetuating your fallacy, even though you can't come out and admit it.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124591 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 7:15 pm to
From our end ("our" referring to those of us who actually pay taxes), the purchase of all equipment and other "fixed assets" transferred to Ukraine was accomplished in toto with our cash. What part of that FACT is unclear to you, facher?
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40233 posts
Posted on 12/6/23 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

Do they have the F-16s in theater yet?


Not expected before early next year and hopefully they are smart enough to not announce their arrival until after Russia finds out the hard way that they are there.
first pageprev pagePage 3379 of 3905Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram