Started By
Message
locked post

What ever happened to hydrogen powered cars?

Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:01 pm
Posted by chryso
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
13129 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:01 pm
I am watching an old episode of Top Gear and they have a hydrogen powered car from 20+ years ago. Why did this not happen?
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
21932 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:03 pm to
Infrastructure is a big issue.

Toyota makes them and you can buy them in California.

Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
125806 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:03 pm to
Govt doesnt want that

Lithium EVs or gtfo
Posted by AlumneyeJ93
Member since Apr 2022
825 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:03 pm to
No infrastructure, safety? Want a bunch of knuckleheads refilling hydrogen.

Ohio State had a hydrogen fuel cell bus on campus back in 2016 or 17.
This post was edited on 11/21/23 at 5:11 pm
Posted by SidetrackSilvera
Member since Nov 2012
2454 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:04 pm to
A hydrogen fuel cell car? It's really a battery-powered car and the hydrogen fuel cell recharges the battery. Honda makes some.
Posted by LootieandtheBlowfish
Houston/BR
Member since Aug 2021
701 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:05 pm to
Just saw a test flight of a hydrogen powered jet the other day on line.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
74522 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:07 pm to
Market is still pretty amall. More of an Euro/British thing right now. BP is really pushing forward in the market.

Ineos is building a H2 version of their new vehicle.
Posted by Horsemeat
Truckin' somewhere in the US
Member since Dec 2014
14506 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:07 pm to
Chinese bribed our politicians into mining lithium for EV, therefore that's why politicians write laws favoring EVs.
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
68123 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:08 pm to
Big Windmill/Solar/EV/Oil/Nuclear/Coal/Steam/Desalination killed it through Dukakis, Clinton, Obama and Biden. I'm pretty sure I read that on the Daily Mail.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30152 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

What ever happened to hydrogen powered cars?


look into "plug power" symbol PLUG

they are doing it for commercial vehicles and machinery

trouble is, hydrogen can go boom like a bomb, so many people still fear it.
Posted by SidetrackSilvera
Member since Nov 2012
2454 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:12 pm to
Hydrogen-powered vehicles use lithium batteries. The problem with cars is that they don't need to refuel enough. The attraction of a battery fuel cell vehicle is one that needs constant refueling. People take their cars from home to work for the most part. It's big rigs, planes and forklifts where the benefit of the H2 technology makes it worth it.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
165333 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

Chinese bribed our politicians into mining lithium for EV, therefore that's why politicians write laws favoring EVs.



Lithium isn't even the predominant material used in EV batteries
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
13297 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:22 pm to
Posted by chryso
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
13129 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

Want a bunch of knuckleheads refilling hydrogen.


Those knuckleheads are currently refilling gasoline. Is hydrogen that much worse?
This post was edited on 11/21/23 at 5:30 pm
Posted by Tempratt
Member since Oct 2013
14566 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

Govt doesnt want that Lithium EVs or gtfo


One thing the government doesn’t want is ease of mobility.

Zero motivation to have quick charging batteries.
Posted by Play_Neck
Member since Dec 2014
2107 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

Those knuckleheads are currently refilling gasoline. Is hydrogen that much worse?


in terms of degree of boom, yes
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
86864 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:39 pm to
Saw one of those Challengers the other day that ran on water. He walked through the whole set up and I’m still skeptical
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
165333 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:39 pm to
quote:


One thing the government doesn’t want is ease of mobility.

Zero motivation to have quick charging batteries.


Do you think they're going to ban solid state batteries?
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
15101 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:53 pm to
We can’t keep our natural gas network together. Switching to hydrogen would be catastrophic.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
11898 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

Those knuckleheads are currently refilling gasoline. Is hydrogen that much worse?

Yes.

As for OP’s question - outside of the potential safety concerns, the other big issue is infrastructure. A major shift to hydrogen power (whether via fuel cells or direct combustion) requires a way to get all of that hydrogen to consumers.

While hydrogen has a high energy density by mass, it has a much lower energy density by volume than gasoline. So it takes something like 3.5 gallons of liquid hydrogen to produce the same amount of energy as 1 gallon of gasoline. A fair amount of this is theoretically offset by the efficiency difference between fuel cells and ICEs, but then you still have the problem of needing to liquify hydrogen and transport it in liquid form.

On top of all of that, hydrogen is notoriously leaky. Being the smallest molecule, it can escape from containers that would otherwise be airtight.

So when you think about all of the infrastructure changes/additions that would be required, hydrogen starts to become impractical as a primary fuel source/energy carrier. Our electric grid may not be suitable for full-scale EV adoption yet but it’s way closer than any hydrogen equivalent.

Because of all of this, most of the focus around hydrogen / fuel cells has shifted to ammonia. The idea is that ammonia is much easier to transport (albeit with its own hazards), has higher volumetric energy density than liquid hydrogen, and can be either used directly in fuel cells or converted to hydrogen at the point of use. There are folks who believe strongly that the future will be an “ammonia economy” but it’s still a long way off.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram