- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If Saban didn’t come here how many natties would we have won since 2000?
Posted on 1/22/23 at 8:59 pm
Posted on 1/22/23 at 8:59 pm
I respect Nick Saban. I hate Nick Saban on Gameday. I mostly hate him every day because he left.
Had Nick Saban not come to LSU where would this program be? Without Saban I think we’d be some kinda mixture of Tennessee and AtM.
Thanks for getting us on the track, Nick! Now go frick yourself.
Had Nick Saban not come to LSU where would this program be? Without Saban I think we’d be some kinda mixture of Tennessee and AtM.
Thanks for getting us on the track, Nick! Now go frick yourself.
This post was edited on 1/22/23 at 9:00 pm
31
Posted on 1/22/23 at 9:00 pm to BPTiger
350
Posted on 1/22/23 at 9:01 pm to BilbeauTBaggins
quote:
350
The only right answer, IMO
Posted on 1/22/23 at 9:07 pm to BPTiger
The more painful question is asking how many would we've won if he didn't have the NFL itch and Wayne Huizenga didn't offer him everything from ownership to the best Miami prostitutes.
Posted on 1/22/23 at 9:10 pm to BPTiger
0
Posted on 1/22/23 at 9:18 pm to BPTiger
I was watching. I also noticed that when that was said Saban nodded in agreement.
Posted on 1/22/23 at 9:19 pm to BPTiger
22
Posted on 1/22/23 at 9:20 pm to BPTiger
0
Posted on 1/22/23 at 9:24 pm to BPTiger
Honestly who fricking knows
Posted on 1/22/23 at 9:30 pm to TigerMeister
2 was won without him, so two
Posted on 1/22/23 at 9:34 pm to TigerMeister
0
Posted on 1/22/23 at 9:34 pm to BPTiger
Probably zero but not impossible we could have won one with the right coaching hire but who knows
Posted on 1/22/23 at 9:34 pm to BPTiger
Better yet, what happens if mark emmert isn’t LSU’s president? He was main reason Saban came. He convinced lsu to stop being cheap and went got nick. If I’m not mistaken, lsu made him one of the highest paid coaches at that time.
Posted on 1/22/23 at 9:35 pm to FreddieMac
quote:Yeah that 2007 title almost definitely isn't happening without Saban coming here
2 was won without him, so two
Posted on 1/22/23 at 9:47 pm to BPTiger
Every Gyot Damn Year
Posted on 1/22/23 at 10:56 pm to Tiger2tiger97
quote:This is the correct answer.
Better yet, what happens if mark emmert isn’t LSU’s president? He was main reason Saban came. He convinced lsu to stop being cheap and went got nick. If I’m not mistaken, lsu made him one of the highest paid coaches at that time.
Dinardo took over LSU in December 1994. In 1995, LSU went 7-4-1 and beat Saban in the Independence Bowl. In 1996, LSU went 10-2. In 1997, LSU went 9-3.
Dinardo woke the sleeping giant. He got LSU into the Top Ten in 1997 and 1998.
Dinardo brought in Faulk and a host of players that ended up winning a NC under Saban.
Dinardo had issues, but a big problem he had was that LSU was too fricking cheap to play football at an elite level.
Mark Emmert saw Dinardo's success and the reasons for his failures. He decided it was time for LSU to play big-time football rather than skimping nickels and dimes.
He offered Saban a five-year contract for $1.2 million annually. Only three other coaches in the country were getting paid a million per year: Bowden, Spurrier, and Fulmer.
By contrast, Dinardo's buyout for FOUR contract years was LESS than ONE year of Saban's contract. Dinardo's buyout was $600,000 for the four years of $150,000 salary. Saban's salary was $1.2 million.
LSU (Emmert) decided to play at an elite level in 1999. Then Emmert hired Saban. Saban did not cause the change to play at an elite level. To the contrary, Saban was a result of that change. He was the coach who received the benefit of that change in direction.
Emmert, Bertman, the Board, and the boosters built the facilities need to play at an elite level.
Saban did NOT lay the foundation for this program to keep being successful. We are NOT a powerhouse program now because of Saban.
The LSU administration changed directions before Saban arrived.
Saban was the beneficiary of that change, NOT the cause of it.
Emmert, the Board, and the boosters watched Dinardo rebuild LSU recruiting and the LSU program. Where were you? They decided to play big-money football, and open up the budget and pay a coach 8 times more than the previous coach.
Saban was in the right place at the right time. LSU was finally ready to spend. Saban benefitted from it, but he did no cause it.
Posted on 1/22/23 at 11:04 pm to BPTiger
quote:
Thanks for getting us on the track, Nick!
How can you say that? You must have forgotten that Saban also directly cost LSU the national title in 2011--that negates the 2003 natty that he did win (i.e., a net gain of zero).
Posted on 1/22/23 at 11:08 pm to BPTiger
Mike Gundy come on down.
Posted on 1/22/23 at 11:14 pm to Salviati
I don't think that you are giving Saban near enough credit. Saban went to the administration and demanded the revamping of our practice and coaching facilities. We were in the dark ages, and he knew that recruiting wars required top notch facilities to win! Not to mention, he brought us our first modern title and put us back on the national map. Sure...it took Emmert to play along and be willing to invest, but Saban deserves and big hunk of that credit as well.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News