- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/27/16 at 6:21 pm to okietiger
SEC Rantards are just here to troll LSU and OCCASIONALLY discuss sports. /thread
Posted on 9/27/16 at 6:30 pm to Tigerdev
Especially with Les Miles being fired, most SEC fans are just gonna shitpost the days away.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 6:30 pm to AUCE05
Lsu has more bowl appearances, more wins, more national titles and more NFL players than Auburn. Some people on here amaze me
Posted on 9/27/16 at 6:41 pm to beardedzeus
quote:Alabama, OSU, Notre Dame, USC, Texas, Florida, FSU, Michigan, UGA, an OU are all arguably better jobs.
pretty sure you can't find one sane individual who doesn't think lsu is a top 5-10 job. It's really not debatable.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 7:32 pm to UAFanFromNOLA
quote:
Alabama, OSU, Notre Dame, USC, Texas, Florida, FSU, Michigan, UGA, an OU are all arguably better jobs.
Kudos on actually reading the thread before posting.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 8:59 pm to UAFanFromNOLA
quote:
Alabama, OSU, Notre Dame, USC, Texas, Florida, FSU, Michigan, UGA, an OU are all arguably better jobs.
Texas, Florida, USC IMO are the top three jobs in college football. The name schools with great resources in the three most talent rich states in the country.
Michigan, ND, and OU are three of the greatest historical programs (all top five or ten) in cfb history - but all three have one or fewer college championships over the last quarter century (OU in 2000, Michigan in 1997, ND has none). All three have fundamental disadvantages that require them to seek a heavy majority of their athletes from other states or even (in the case of ND) disqualify many of the better players they might want. The co-ed population is also terrible at all three.
RE: Alabama, UGA, FSU, tOSU? I don't have a problem with anyone who argues for LSU or against with most of these. I think LSU has decent revenue advantage over all but Alabama and also dominates the state in recruiting in a way that none of the others can actually claim. I'm not claiming innate recruiting superiority over those schools, but with LA and eastern Texas I don't think any of the others can claim superior footing over LSU either.
Ask me to make a list and I might say:
1) Texas
2) Florida
3) USC
4) Alabama/tOSU/LSU/UGA
8) FSU
9) ND/OU/Michigan
But as genro argued in a separate thread on this board, I think the rankings depend on the individual coach as well. For a person with a regional or personal attachment to an institution (e.g. Harbaugh at Michigan) a "lower" ranked school may be #1.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:00 pm to okietiger
It's tough because at LSU the expectation is be Nick Saban or you're fired midseason.
This post was edited on 9/27/16 at 9:07 pm
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:21 pm to Arkansasrazorback
quote:
It's tough because at LSU the expectation is be Nick Saban or you're fired midseason.
After more than a decade? OK.
There are expectations of winning but LSU didn't fire Miles for losing to Alabama. He was fired for losing to the Auburn, Arkansas, MSU, Ole Miss, and Wisconsin. Granted, some of those were decent teams but LSU was favored in all or almost all of those matchups and has simply under-performed for around four seasons. When your new ceiling of 10 or 11 wins used to be your floor or near your floor you've gone the wrong way as a head coach.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:34 pm to OchoDedos
before 2000, lsu was easily a top 20 program, borderline top 15. not elite, but after we started putting money into the program it took off. gen Xers remember the archer - dinardo years, but not much before unless they were huge football fanatics like me. we went to the orange bowl and two sugar bowls in the 80's along with two sec championships. and that wasn't a great decade for lsu.
89-99 sucked, no doubt. had a few winning seasons and some bowls, but was pretty bad.
arnsparger left because we wouldn't pay for coaches and facility upgrades.
thank goodness for saban, he did more than just coach football here. he brought every aspect of the program up to par with the big boys.
89-99 sucked, no doubt. had a few winning seasons and some bowls, but was pretty bad.
arnsparger left because we wouldn't pay for coaches and facility upgrades.
thank goodness for saban, he did more than just coach football here. he brought every aspect of the program up to par with the big boys.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 9:43 pm to okietiger
The premise of this thread is ridiculous IMO.
You've got people who literally get paid for their opinions on these matters and you've got random posters on the SEC Rant, 98% of which are only on here to troll.
Every "expert" in the country would rank LSU in the top-10 college football jobs.
Random ranter would rank LSU near the bottom of the SEC because doing so gives them a hard on.
You've got people who literally get paid for their opinions on these matters and you've got random posters on the SEC Rant, 98% of which are only on here to troll.
Every "expert" in the country would rank LSU in the top-10 college football jobs.
Random ranter would rank LSU near the bottom of the SEC because doing so gives them a hard on.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 10:29 pm to okietiger
quote:
I've seen plenty of people debate it. OU fans I'm around think it's a step down from OU (wut). Go look at the thread over in the SECr (I know, I know). But still.
Oklahomans think very highly of OU and very lowly of the SEC - they also think OU is a more prestigious program than Alabama so I'm not surprised at all they'd think OU is the #1 job in America
Posted on 9/27/16 at 10:33 pm to okietiger
quote:
I'm around think it's a step down from OU
um because it is.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 11:05 pm to okietiger
we have people in our fan base that think it is ok for a top 5 program in the nation to hire "2nd tier" guys instead of saying we can only hire a home run or we will riot. until the whole fan base is on the same page on that then everyone will be just as confused on how big of a job LSU is.
Posted on 9/27/16 at 11:45 pm to Hook Em Horns
quote:
I'm around think it's a step down from OU
um because it is.
In the same sense that OU is a football step down from Yale or Harvard?
Posted on 9/28/16 at 12:06 am to okietiger
1. Alabama
2. Ohio State
3. Texas
4. LSU
5. Florida State
6. Michigan
7. USC
8. Oklahoma
9. Florida
10. Notre Dame
11. Oregon
12. Georgia
13. Clemson
14. Auburn
15. Penn State
16. Ole Miss
17. A & M
18. Michigan State
19. UCLA
20. Tennessee
Combining past prestige, revenue, coaches salary, facilities, recent success, attendance, program allure.
2. Ohio State
3. Texas
4. LSU
5. Florida State
6. Michigan
7. USC
8. Oklahoma
9. Florida
10. Notre Dame
11. Oregon
12. Georgia
13. Clemson
14. Auburn
15. Penn State
16. Ole Miss
17. A & M
18. Michigan State
19. UCLA
20. Tennessee
Combining past prestige, revenue, coaches salary, facilities, recent success, attendance, program allure.
Posted on 9/28/16 at 12:28 am to Lester Earl
Cant really argue much with that list. Thats your personal list I'm assuming?
I think 1-3 arent even debatable. Lsu at 4 is solid and thats where I would have them. 5,6, and 7 are fluid. USC would be 5 if their administration wasnt screwed and the past years of stupidity.
After that its a crapshoot if I am going to try and alter anything. I think ND is more desirable for a coach but I dont think kids really see it as some high profile destination.
Georgia could be higher. Penn State could be lower.
I think 1-3 arent even debatable. Lsu at 4 is solid and thats where I would have them. 5,6, and 7 are fluid. USC would be 5 if their administration wasnt screwed and the past years of stupidity.
After that its a crapshoot if I am going to try and alter anything. I think ND is more desirable for a coach but I dont think kids really see it as some high profile destination.
Georgia could be higher. Penn State could be lower.
Posted on 9/28/16 at 7:40 am to Hook Em Horns
quote:
um because it is.
If you don't think OU's prestige has taken a nose a dive because of the Big 12 the past 5 years then I don't know what to tell you.
They're having challenges recruiting against juggernauts such as TCU, Baylor, and even Houston.
Popular
Back to top

0









