Started By
Message

re: Who Still Wants the Houston Coach's and Spread Offense?

Posted on 12/31/09 at 12:57 pm to
Posted by RandyMarsh
South Park
Member since Dec 2009
1770 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

SEE OU?????????? I think they have lost four games this year. I don't like their offense either.


Oklahoma is allowing 13.5 points per game this year. LSU is allowing 16.0. Oklahoma will have at least 4 players from their front 7 this year playing in the NFL next year. Their defense is just as good, if not better than LSU's.

Oklahoma is scoring 31.1 points per game despite their injuries on offense. LSU is scoring 25.5 points per game with little to no injuries.

Oklahoma has a better coaching staff than LSU as well.

If you are going to talk shite about a team, at least talk shite to the right ones dumbass.
Posted by 7 Moves
Chicago
Member since Sep 2009
2613 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 12:58 pm to
In the long run, balanced passing, running, and the ability to do both well produces the best long term results. Fads play out -- wishbone, fun and gun, spread option ......... Most pro teams, Alabama, USC, Perino& Arkansas, etc. run pro-style offenses -- that is my point in this thread. A lot of people on this board are constantly harping on spread / fun and gun and other gimmicks. LSU needs an offensive identity and pro style is what we need -- not Crowton's experimental madness, and not Sumlin's either.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
163153 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 1:01 pm to
Idiot
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81671 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

In the long run


says a guy who based the failure of spread offenses in the first quarter of the Bell Helicopter Bowl
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
48738 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Fads play out -- wishbone, fun and gun, spread option


The wishbone dominated CFB for decades. The Fun n Gun dominated the SEC for a decade and the spread option won 2 of the last 4 BCSNC's.

quote:

that is my point in this thread
I don't think you really have a point in this thread. It started by making judgment on Houston's offense based on one half of football, which is idiotic in itself, then you split off to talk about the NFL, then OU, then... Focus man, focus, geez.
This post was edited on 12/31/09 at 1:04 pm
Posted by RandyMarsh
South Park
Member since Dec 2009
1770 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

In the long run, balanced passing, running, and the ability to do both well produces the best long term results. Fads play out -- wishbone, fun and gun, spread option ......... Most pro teams, Alabama, USC, Perino& Arkansas, etc. run pro-style offenses -- that is my point in this thread. A lot of people on this board are constantly harping on spread / fun and gun and other gimmicks. LSU needs an offensive identity and pro style is what we need -- not Crowton's experimental madness, and not Sumlin's either.


Fun and Gun won at least a share of 7 SEC titles and a National title. Urban Meyer's offense has won him 2 national titles. The "gimmick" offenses have worked just fine in the SEC.

Now let's look at the NFL: The top 5 scoring offenses in the NFL this year all use the Shotgun liberally with 3-4-5 wide receivers and it works just fine for them - and that doesn't even include the Colts or the Cardinals. Just because a team spreads out a defense and passes alot doesn't mean that they never run. Hell once teams get a big arse lead passing, they usually sit on it with the i-formation running.

For someone who claims to have watched football for 48 years, you don't know shite about the game of football.
Posted by RandyMarsh
South Park
Member since Dec 2009
1770 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 1:59 pm to
I love how 7 moves abandon this thread so quickly
Posted by Cash
Vail
Member since Feb 2005
37645 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 2:11 pm to
SMU and their spread offense beat balanced Nevada 45-10. Pro-style/balanced offenses are dead.

Long live the spread.
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
56723 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 2:21 pm to
So these rantards think the spread is supposed to work 100 percent of the time in every single game? And when a team that runs the spread has a bad game, the entire system is a failure?
Posted by Cash
Vail
Member since Feb 2005
37645 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 2:22 pm to
Yes, that is the line of thinking at work.
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
88394 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Like always, the spread, fun and gun, and other gimmick offenses get exposed.


Posted by just me
Front of the Class: Schooling You
Member since Mar 2006
34489 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 2:33 pm to
There is one truth about football.

Change is inevitable.
Posted by 7 Moves
Chicago
Member since Sep 2009
2613 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 2:40 pm to
Hey gimmick offense offense lovers, I didn't abandon this thread. Went to have a drink of whiskey with a friend. My sole point of this thread is that the reason most pro teams do not employ gimmick fun and gun, spread option, and never adapted the wishbone is because balanced running, passing, and traditional offenses establish more of an identity and win more often than this junk. I like the Bama, USC, Arkansas, Stanford, Saints, Patriots, Eagles and other pro style offenses.
Posted by 7 Moves
Chicago
Member since Sep 2009
2613 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 2:52 pm to
Hey Max, I didn't base anything on the game today about Houston's offense, only used it as a launching pad to give my opinion on the reasons why LSU should not go in this direction as many on this board advocate. I've watched this style for years and don't care for it.
Posted by LSUtigahs28
Member since Sep 2008
14561 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

My sole point of this thread is that the reason most pro teams do not employ gimmick fun and gun, spread option, and never adapted the wishbone is because balanced running, passing, and traditional offenses establish more of an identity and win more often than this junk.


So what does this have to do with college?

quote:

I like the Bama, USC, Arkansas, Stanford, Saints, Patriots, Eagles and other pro style offenses.


So you like spread offenses? See Arky, Patriots, Eagles
Posted by Cash
Vail
Member since Feb 2005
37645 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 3:01 pm to
NFL teams would never run anything gimicky like the Wild Cat.
Posted by 7 Moves
Chicago
Member since Sep 2009
2613 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 6:50 pm to
Houston runs a gimicky spread.
Posted by LSUtigahs28
Member since Sep 2008
14561 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 6:51 pm to
quote:


Houston runs a gimicky spread.


How is it gimicky?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

Like always, the spread, fun and gun, and other gimmick offenses get exposed. Anyone watching the Air Force beat down. Pro Style Offenses rule.



This is funny. We just redefined Pro Style offense.
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 12/31/09 at 7:36 pm to
i'm with you 7 Moves. it's really pretty easy to assess. balanced pro-styles win all or almost all of the NC's. UF's spread still contained the power running component with Tebow. it's just that the "grass is greener" syndrome abounds amongst many fans. i expect most of these are the younger fans that don't really have a large "universe" of experience to draw from nor have they played the game. it's really pretty funny to read what some of our fans want to do....fire miles, crowton, stud, chavis, haley. pay the $20 million or so to get rid of them and then hire guys that have only had one good year but are "hot" right now and tie them up with expensive outs. oh well, money grows on trees i guess.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram