- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What are the pros of Napier if we can't get Riley or Aranda?
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:04 pm
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:04 pm
I haven't done much research on him, but from what I've heard is if he is saying he wants to be here, that is what I like to hear. Someone who wants to be at a specific place. What do y'all think about him? Pros and cons and stuff.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:06 pm to AlldayTiger
Unproven in terms of being the head coach of a major football program. Let’s just say the ceiling is very high but the floor is very low. Napier might be the biggest gamble of all the candidates.
This post was edited on 11/19/21 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:08 pm to DhanTigers212
I don't think the floor is as low as some people think.
He's an excellent, excellent recruiter. That's enough to win most games.
He's also a better x's and o's coach than either of the previous two we had.
He's an excellent, excellent recruiter. That's enough to win most games.
He's also a better x's and o's coach than either of the previous two we had.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:09 pm to AlldayTiger
If we can’t get Aranda then that would be a complete embarrassment.
Napier would be fine I’m sure but there is risk with him.
Napier would be fine I’m sure but there is risk with him.
This post was edited on 11/19/21 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:10 pm to AlldayTiger
He's likeable, has program humming four years into stint at ULL, learned from Saban, knows LSU's recruiting area well, offense-minded, can start in 10 days
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:11 pm to DhanTigers212
quote:would you say the same of Smart when UGA hired him, or Fisher when FSU hired him, or Dabo when Clemson hired him, or even Urban Meyer when Florida hired him?
Unproven in terms of being the head coach of a major football program.
This post was edited on 11/19/21 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:12 pm to AlldayTiger
Here's 2 things you need to know:
-An asst. coach on Bama staff was once asked about the difference between Saban/Napier's coaching style. His answer...one's offense and one's defense. That's about as strong as it gets from a comparison standpoint.
-A Bama grad I work with who is very tied to Bama football told me that Napier at LSU scares him more than the other names he's hearing float around.
Is it risky? Yes. Is he worth it? Not sure. Do "football" people think he's going to be a big-time coach in P5 sooner than later? Yes
-An asst. coach on Bama staff was once asked about the difference between Saban/Napier's coaching style. His answer...one's offense and one's defense. That's about as strong as it gets from a comparison standpoint.
-A Bama grad I work with who is very tied to Bama football told me that Napier at LSU scares him more than the other names he's hearing float around.
Is it risky? Yes. Is he worth it? Not sure. Do "football" people think he's going to be a big-time coach in P5 sooner than later? Yes
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:15 pm to AlldayTiger
How do you know there aren’t 25 other coaches before him? He is Tier 3-
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:15 pm to Chicken
quote:
would you say the same of Smart when UGA hired him, or Fisher when FSU hired him, or Dabo when Clemson hired him, or even Urban Meyer when Florida hired him?
Yes I would have. I’m not saying Napier would be a bad hire. I’m just saying it’s high risk high reward that’s all. He’s unproven that’s a fact. There’s been a lot of unproven coaches who haven’t panned out like the coach’s you just mentioned.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:22 pm to Chicken
quote:
would you say the same of Smart when UGA hired him, or Fisher when FSU hired him, or Dabo when Clemson hired him, or even Urban Meyer when Florida hired him?
Chicken is correct!
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:28 pm to Tiger1988
quote:
25 other coaches before him? He is Tier 3-
Come on man. This man is in the mix.
He may not be the number one choice but hes up there on that list
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:31 pm to Tiger1988
How do you know Napier is tier 3-
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:47 pm to Chicken
quote:
would you say the same of Smart when UGA hired him, or Fisher when FSU hired him, or Dabo when Clemson hired him, or even Urban Meyer when Florida hired him?
Only Dabo. Everyone else on that list was much more proven and WTF URBAN WAS A MONSTER BEFORE UF.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:50 pm to tigersquad89
quote:
Napier would be fine I’m sure but there is risk with him.
There is risk with Aranda as well. Napier has much more HC experience than Aranda and is a better recruiter. But it is not what you or I think that matters, it is what Woodward thinks and he apparently possibly thinks that Aranda is the higher risk of the two according to sources on this forum.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:53 pm to Tiger1988
quote:I was responding to "Unproven in terms of being the head coach of a major football program."
Tiger1988
None of those guys listed were proven head coaches of a major football program before they were hired to their respective schools...FACT!
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:54 pm to MEd LSU
quote:
How do you know Napier is tier 3-
Because of where he coaches, how poorly he has performed this season after allegedly having the number 1 recruiting class 3 years in a row in the Sun Belt, and the other P5 at lesser programs but are successful. You start by HC at elite programs. Then to HCs at successful lower tiers P5’s like Baylor, ISU, MSU, ISU, Ole Piss, etc. then you move to Elite HCs at non-p5’s. Also, somewhere in there are elite The last one one is Tier 3.
This post was edited on 11/19/21 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:56 pm to AlldayTiger
PROs:
Enthusiastic recruiter
Strong offensive mind
Familiarity with the area
Focused on program building
One of us
CONs:
Lack of P5 experience
Not prepared for politics of the LSU job
Enthusiastic recruiter
Strong offensive mind
Familiarity with the area
Focused on program building
One of us
CONs:
Lack of P5 experience
Not prepared for politics of the LSU job
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News