Started By
Message
locked post

Is anyone opposed to Matt Campbell?

Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:22 pm
Posted by texastiger15
Dallas, TX
Member since Jan 2019
564 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:22 pm
Obviously not our first choice but a safe option
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123594 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:23 pm to
Doesn't move the needle at all
Posted by LSUinMA
Commerce, Texas
Member since Nov 2008
4776 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:24 pm to
He would be fine.
Posted by SemiNoblePursuit
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2016
1501 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:25 pm to
He’s stable, he’s won some big games, he’s got big fricking teeth (alpha af). I wouldn’t hate it.
Posted by GeauxBayouBengals
Member since Nov 2003
6145 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:25 pm to
Depends on the contract. If they have to break the bank to get him, no way.
Posted by TheTexasTiger7
Dallas - Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2018
9387 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:25 pm to
He would be a good option, but probably about 5th on the list. I think Dave, Fickell, Meyer, and Rhule would all be better hires than him.
Posted by MSTiger61
Member since Jan 2020
760 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:25 pm to
Yes. Big gamble, especially with recruiting. Would drop a few games to teams like MSU or Arky every year.
Posted by BayouBlogger
Left Coast
Member since Aug 2015
1025 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:25 pm to
I think he’d do all right. Not opposed but not excited.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84831 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

he’s got big fricking teeth (alpha af)


Come again?
Posted by MakeLSUgoodAgain
Member since Sep 2021
131 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:26 pm to
Speaking in third person…..”Matt Campbell is opposed to Matt Campbell.”
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98139 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:26 pm to
Has brought a bottom dweller to respectability. That doesn't always translate to success at the elite level. Could do a lot better, could do a lot worse.
Posted by MS_Tigers07
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2015
1316 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:27 pm to
He makes me nervous. We all saw what happens to coaches that don’t like to or don’t recruit well in the SEC, even if they are good coaches with Dan Mullen.
Posted by SemiNoblePursuit
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2016
1501 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

Come again?

Would you want someone with tiny, kernel teeth running this program?
Posted by CoyoteSong
Colorado
Member since Aug 2021
2603 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:30 pm to
Matt Campbell= Gene Chizik


No thanks
Posted by Sharlo
Van down by the river.
Member since Oct 2021
333 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:31 pm to
I’m of the mind that this thing is off of the rails. With that in mind, it’s difficult to be opposed to any viable option while we’re out here naked in the cold. Campbell is viable IMO.

Doesn’t mean I like the option. Just being realistic based on what appears to be the predicament we find ourselves in.
Posted by Zzyzx
Member since Nov 2018
1872 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:31 pm to
My first choice all along (outside of Saban)
Posted by ShermanTxTiger
Broussard, La
Member since Oct 2007
10839 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:33 pm to
Better than Zero. Not my ideal hire.
Posted by tigerbait01
Sec. 423 Row 18
Member since Jul 2007
3935 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:34 pm to
Don’t want
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28502 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:34 pm to
I like the guy. Great curved bill hat. None if this flatbill nonsense
Posted by BayouBlogger
Left Coast
Member since Aug 2015
1025 posts
Posted on 11/28/21 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

Matt Campbell= Gene Chizik



Chizik went 5-19 at Iowa St.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram