- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Earl Lane v. Coach O
Posted on 12/18/08 at 11:24 am
Posted on 12/18/08 at 11:24 am
Based on the performance of the D-line this year, in light of the senior talent we had, it's safe to say that they underachieved. This could be attributed, at least in part, to the guy who was coaching them.
With that said, would Coach O be an improvement. Obviously, he would be a recruiting asset and I've heard about his shirtless motivational tactics. But does anyone know how he stacks up as a coach fundamentally? Can this guy coach up our D-line talent? Is he better than Lane in that regard?
With that said, would Coach O be an improvement. Obviously, he would be a recruiting asset and I've heard about his shirtless motivational tactics. But does anyone know how he stacks up as a coach fundamentally? Can this guy coach up our D-line talent? Is he better than Lane in that regard?
This post was edited on 12/18/08 at 11:25 am
Posted on 12/18/08 at 11:27 am to Acadiana Tigers
I would have to say yes. He's been at miami, u.s.c, and ole miss. At all three stops the defensive line talent and performance improved.
Posted on 12/18/08 at 11:31 am to dos crystal
Earl Lane is terrible.
Posted on 12/18/08 at 11:33 am to Ethan Martin
Why did Earl have the DL count to 3 Mississippi before the could rush this season ? 
Posted on 12/18/08 at 11:34 am to Ethan Martin
quote:
Earl Lane is terrible.
I wish we would stop attacking our own.
Is it not enough to express the belief that LSU can, and should, improve at the DL coaching position and that Coach O would be an improvement?
Thee is no need to say "Lane is Horrible" and "Malleveto are idiots", etc.
Replace them and wish them well in their future endeavors.
This post was edited on 12/18/08 at 11:35 am
Posted on 12/18/08 at 11:40 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
These guys are getting paid heavily to put a premium product out on the field. They are not above harsh criticism.
Posted on 12/18/08 at 11:43 am to Louie T
Perhaps, but I agree with BlackHelicopterPilot. It is more constructive and appropriate to the conversation to cite examples and develop arguments rather than to use language that is judgment laden and vague. That's the kind of language that makes rational folks want to disengage.
My 2.
My 2.
Posted on 12/18/08 at 11:45 am to sertorius
Well said. My comment was pretty tacky,too.
Posted on 12/18/08 at 11:46 am to Louie T
quote:
These guys are getting paid heavily to put a premium product out on the field. They are not above harsh criticism.
Why can't we be?
Posted on 12/18/08 at 11:51 am to Macavity92
FWIW - the Saints D-Line play was atrocious this year. Not saying its his fault, but it was poor from a mechanics standpoint. Smith and Grant couldn't get past an Offensive Tackle if their life depended on it.
As for recruiting, we have done very well under Hensen's leadership. Of course, the more good recruiters the better.
It seems Coach O's best attributes (aside from recruiting) are motivation and discipline. That is much needed. But our guys do still need solid fundemental coaching.
As for recruiting, we have done very well under Hensen's leadership. Of course, the more good recruiters the better.
It seems Coach O's best attributes (aside from recruiting) are motivation and discipline. That is much needed. But our guys do still need solid fundemental coaching.
Posted on 12/18/08 at 12:31 pm to Acadiana Tigers
quote:
Obviously, he would be a recruiting asset and I've heard about his shirtless motivational tactics. But does anyone know how he stacks up as a coach fundamentally?
Yes. He's had success at this everywhere along the way... and he's even improved the Saints defensive line this year. Hell they shut down a couple unbelievable running backs...
Posted on 12/18/08 at 12:35 pm to Tig1969
atrocious? really?
while O didn't work wonders with them it was still a solid DL. Grant was actually having a pretty good season before his injury. They've also gotten pretty good production at the DT spot despite a shite ton of injuries.
while O didn't work wonders with them it was still a solid DL. Grant was actually having a pretty good season before his injury. They've also gotten pretty good production at the DT spot despite a shite ton of injuries.
Posted on 12/18/08 at 1:17 pm to BilJ
quote:
They've also gotten pretty good production at the DT spot despite a shite ton of injuries.
Thank you.
Posted on 12/18/08 at 2:42 pm to Tig1969
The Saint's DL might not have been the best in the league this year, but they are vastly improved from last year. That is on O.
Also Lane is terrible. frick if you don't want to hear it.
Also Lane is terrible. frick if you don't want to hear it.
Popular
Back to top
2







