Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Houston
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:54
Registered on:8/17/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
You’re absolutely right! We should settle for 4-7 wins per season and a middle of the road bowl season. No reason to strive for success because we had to live through the bad football years of the 80s and 90s!

BTW, I want whatever you’re smoking if you think there’s a single fan ban base of any team on our level that doesn’t want to win NCs every year and beat their rival.
I don’t mind an analytics guy doing the ground work during the week and advising the OC on best plays to run based on the analytics, but we’re talking about two coaches who clearly aren’t on the same page which completely screws up everything from preparation, to play calling, to timing, etc.. No wonder we’ve regressed…

re: Why do you guys want Joe Brady?

Posted by sosimpo1 on 12/8/20 at 9:05 pm to
Who cares? Give him a chance and if it doesn’t work out then we move on. He would be better than the current situation, that’s almost guaranteed.

re: Rece Davis is a fricking POS

Posted by sosimpo1 on 3/16/19 at 11:31 am to
A “strong offer” could literally mean the following:

(Wade to Smart): you’ll start from day 1 and never have to compete for your spot. You’ll be a star player and in the spot light from the second you step on campus and with the team I’m building you’ll have a strong chance at a national championship run and a lotto pick in the draft. If you struggle with school during the year I will get you tutors and personally put in as much time as needed to make you the most successful player you can possibly be. I will give you my personal number and if you ever need ANYTHING I will be there to help out, no matter what time of day. You will be the face of LSU basketball and will spearhead our national championship run while also having the opportunity to make yourself a household name and build your brand the way you want to.

All of this “strong offer” talk could literally mean he’s promising Smart an unaltered spot starting for a high callibur team for as long as he’s on campus with unfettered access to coaching and TV time. LSU would benefit from an offer like this over a team like Duke who would already have “star players” and faces of the program.

A strong offer doesn’t have to be financial or even an NCAA violation. It could literally mean allowing Smart the opportunity to be the face of the program and build his image the way he wants to in a program that would get a lot of attention for being better than the experts predicted.
Look, realistically nothing changes. We have an interim coach and there will be a “search” for a new coach (whatever that means) and life will go on.

The only thing that will really induce change is $$$$ and the higher ups know LSU sports is too important to the people of Louisiana to stop financial support.

This means they will do what they’ve been doing and change nothing until the money stops flowing in. That’s just the sad reality of the situation at hand.
I don’t know what’s more sad: the fact that this is true, or the fact that LSU fans are excited about this...
You do realize that as an offensive coach it’s literally his job to learn the playbook of the OC, and know it in and out?

I keep seeing a plus for E is that he was able to learn _____’s playbook, and it’s such a stupid argument because he was paid to do that, before he ever took over playcalling duties. Now if your argument is that he was a better playcaller then those OCs, fine, but stop saying he knew the playbook because that was his freaking job. Just like the O-line coach, the WR coach, the QB coach, and so on.

This argument makes you look so freaking unknowledgeable it completely negates the rest of your post, no matter how valid it is.
If you watch the end of the play the safety does come down to about the 20 yard line. My guess is his primary responsibility is to cover a TE or release, and once he's diagnosed it's a run play he's secondary responsibility is to stuff the run/any holes. Everything else you said was spot on.

But thinking about it this leaves 1-on-1 coverage on the back side so Bama has absolutely zero respect for our passing game in that one situation. I can't speak for the rest of the game but it seems as though they've played man coverage in the past games so maybe that's always been the case?
The major differenrce that seems to always be forgotten when these posts pop us is that CEO was hired to maintain what we had, and bump us over the hill into the playoffs. That means 10+, winning the SEC, and upgrading the offense in the process. LSU looked "competitive" against a (basically) second string FL team, and could have easily gone to OT if not for a missed extra point.

If we had a first year coach that was hired to change the culture, and needed time to get his guys in place and recruit players to fit his system, people wouldn't be screaming that the sky is falling, but we don't have that do we? We have a system that is run first (same as Miles) with a coach who was freaking hired to keep Miles' train moving in the same direction (same). So we shouldn't have to tolerate the "he needs time" or the "he needs his talent in there", no B.S.. If O wanted time then he should have said so before he took the job, not sell himself to keep the ship on course.
Did Alleva even contact Herman prior to November? We had MONTHS before Texas even knew they were going to search for a coach to get a deal done. That can't be said enough, and yet we did absolutely nothing. It's almost as if Alleva forgot we had to find a coach and then turned on ESPN one day and realized Texas was singing Herman, so he panicked and asked CEO to be the head coach.
Dumb question but could TAF not find the entire buyout and call it something different? Lump sum donation to "repairs" or something different (which is really just the buyout) and the school "accepts" the money for a "project" but really just lump sums CEO? It's some shady accounting but this is Louisiana we are talking about here.. I can't help but feel like some heavy boosters/donators could make this happen in a week..
Stop please? With LSUs AD budget there isn't any reason why we can't get anyone in the country not named Nick Saban. There is absolutely zero reason why LSU can open the check book tonight, get rid of O at the end of the season, and target 2-3 up in comers who will truly bring some fresh life, and a new offensive game plan to our school. If those targets want to bring in their own Defensive guys then so be it, or we can keep Aranda, but the pitty party of "no one wants to come here" is utter bullshite and it really needs to stop. It's a defeatist attitude and it's simply wrong.
Maybe because it's a carbon copy of the last 10 years of offense we've seen at LSU? Now that they're talking about removing the pre-snap movement this will literally be the same offense. So we're paying Canada how much to change not one single thing? Seriously?!
Did we miss on those two targets, or did our AD not even try to swing? At this point, I'm not conceived that our AD actually made any offers to anyone, let alone balk at a price war with other teams.
Realistically if they would have caught that pass in the 2nd quarter that would have been a touchdown, we would have lost that game. Usually when people say "we were one missed catch away from losing" it's BS but in this case, it's absolutely true.
So your answer to all of this is "it's ok, we will be primed and ready for a homerun IF coach O fails"? Isn't that the exact scenario tiger fans just witnessed last season?!

We literally fired our coach in September due to failure and we were more than in a "prime position" to find his replacement. We had a 2 month jump start on the entire country to build relationships and weed out any unserious parties, which is almost verbatim what your describing will supposedly happen if O fails. What you fail to realize is that it literally didn't happen, just now. And it played out infornt of your eyes. You can't make this up!

I'm neither for or against O, he is who the powers at be choose and we will have to live through the good and/or bad until his contract is up. Hopefully it will be the latter. But to try and rally the troops behind "we will be in perfect position if O fails" is just plain ignorant.

Not to be rude but wake up and look at the entire picture. We had a perfect set up, almost what you really want in that situation other than having a "next man up" (which rarely if never happens), and we did nothing with it. What makes you so confident the LSU administration won't botch this one up too?
What is really so great is that Alleva can almost completely make up for everything over the last few years by simply doing nothing. Just tell the SEC we will wait for the end of the season to resecheule. Once the final whistle is blown agains TAMU, we'll let you know where we stand. Period. He should be just as unwilling to negotiate as Florida was.
I honestly wouldn't mind this as our #3-4 if Herman, Jimbo, and (ugh) Petrino say no to life changing money. His offensive scheme, with LSU talent, would be absolutely devistating to the SEC. His defenses are relatively strong as well. Not entirely sure how he would recruit the next level but the dude can flat out coach.

re: Temper Expectations

Posted by sosimpo1 on 9/25/16 at 6:35 pm to
Don't be surprised if you see more of the same against Mizzou. It's technically a short week (considering we have 5 practice days before the next game, so that isn't enough time to get anything new established to a degree of being comfortable to run live.

I'll expect more of the same, with some different situational play calling, until the S. Miss game. By then we will have had enough time to see real changes in the play book. We will see though.
I'll be honest. I wanted Miles gone last year and our offense is just boring, but I think getting rid of Miles tomorrow would destroy the teams mentality. Say what you will but Miles is like a father to these kids and they won't take lightly to him getting canned in the middle of the season.