Started By
Message

Italy banning large cruise ships from Venetian Harbor

Posted on 7/14/21 at 11:07 am
Posted by BlackenedOut
The Big Sleazy
Member since Feb 2011
6060 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 11:07 am
Just read that Italy’s government has banned cruise ships from docking in Venice or even entering the Venetian harbor. As someone who loves Venice but not the overcrowding caused by big boat day tripping masses, pretty awesome news.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130226 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 11:36 am to
This is really great news.
Posted by Wiseguy
Member since Mar 2020
4073 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 11:42 am to
Long overdue.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24205 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 11:50 am to
While I agree this is good news, to play devil's advocate I'm curious how this will affect the local people and business's? That's a lot of money turned away and a huge portion of those island's economy is tourism based.
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 11:58 am to
A ton of people still visit Venice via other means of transportation.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24205 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

A ton of people still visit Venice via other means of transportation.


Well certainly. I've never taken a cruise in my life fwiw and I've been to Venice.

But still one cruise ship is 1,000s of people. I don't have a clue how often the stop in there. Maybe the city has a plan to make up some of that?

ETA; I remember part of the problem was that most of the cruisers didn't stay in hotels or do other things that the regular tourists did. So while they brought money in, it wasn't nearly as much as the visitors of other methods.
This post was edited on 7/14/21 at 12:19 pm
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130226 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:52 pm to
Most locals and people there have been fighting against it for years. The absolute insane overcrowding really doesn't help them as much as you think. They would sell similar amounts with more normal crowds and there is way less downside. The cruise ships are doing a ton of damage.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20970 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:55 pm to
Yeah, Venice desperately needs less tourism. It needs to be a real city, not some kind of Disbeyland-on-water museum.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24205 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

They would sell similar amounts with more normal crowds


lol. Ok....Again, I don't have an issue with this at all. But this idea that it won't hurt some businesses is just ignorant. Maybe it won't matter, I don't know.

All I'm saying is that this is a tale as old as time, people bitch about tourists and then the tourists go away and tons of jobs are lost and small businesses close down.

Venice isn't the easiest town to get to from the rest of Europe and heart of Italy. Its not hard, its not far, just not super easy.

Maybe a major pull back is needed and then a recovery down the way. Maybe that's not the worst.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130226 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:56 pm to
Its really never going to be a "real" city again, but during the day the place is a fricking zoo and you can't get anywhere, let alone buy anything. At night it is lovely.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24205 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 12:58 pm to
quote:


Yeah, Venice desperately needs less tourism. It needs to be a real city, not some kind of Disbeyland-on-water museum.


See, this is the exact ignorance people say all the time and my exact point. What is your suggestion to make up for it?

Its a city on an island in the middle of a lagoon, normal business is not profitable there. The logistics have already failed over and over, that's why everyone that doesn't work in tourism basically has already left the city. So you can't just take away a major source of tourism and expect something to fill the gap.

Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130226 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 1:01 pm to
There's a balance between no tourism and what Venice has morphed into with the cruise ships.

The cruise ships can park elsewhere and many people can still get to Venice. Venice will still be a zoo. It just might be more manageable.

And it won't do the environmental damage the cruise ships were doing.
This post was edited on 7/14/21 at 1:02 pm
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24205 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

And it won't do the environmental damage the cruise ships were doing.


Absolutely agree with this

quote:

There's a balance between no tourism and what Venice has morphed into with the cruise ships.


Sure, but again that was likely a major source of the tourists. Its not easy to take something major away and replace that void.

I haven't paid attention to this so I don't know all the details. Knowing the Italians, they don't care and are happy to have no tourists and less money. But I was talking in regards to other tourism in the city, if there's not enough business to support the current businesses, that city could fall apart with a quickness.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130226 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 1:16 pm to
I imagine whole new businesses will sprout up around getting people from where the Cruise ships are allowed to dock to Venice.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24205 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 1:22 pm to
So a quick read online is saying they are just moving them to Marghera, which looking at the map is just the mainland basically where the train comes in. So this may not have much of an impact on the cruises afterall? They would likely just stop in the mainland and then take smaller ferries or the train into Venice.
Posted by hungryone
river parishes
Member since Sep 2010
11987 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 2:07 pm to
Thank the angels and the saints and all the spirits of the dead Doges! Long overdue. Mass, low-dollar tourism needs to be replaced with higher-dollar, lower volume tourism at key sites all over Italy. I was last in Venice on Ash Wednesday 2020, just before the total shutdown. It's a lovely place to visit when not as crowded as Bourbon St on Mardi Gras.

Look at what the greedy Vatican does with the Vatican museums: shove as many people as humanly possible into a shuffling queue of humanity to briefly peer at some of the world's greatest treasures. Ditto for the Louvre...you can hardly experience the art due to the relentless press of the people.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40857 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Mass, low-dollar tourism needs to be replaced with higher-dollar, lower volume tourism at key sites all over Italy.


I was about to post something and I see you said the quiet part out loud for sake of discussion.

"Over" tourism has been much discussed before COVID. For example, more strict limitations on who/when can climb Macchu Picchu. Dubrovnik has also contemplated limiting cruise ships.

I have mixed feelings about it, because I think it would be kind of shitty that only people with money can enjoy the world's greatest treasures.

It doesn't help that the type of people who promote these kind of things tend to be very elitist and unpleasant, talking out both sides of their mouth about caring for the common man but making the world a more expensive place to get by in.
This post was edited on 7/14/21 at 3:07 pm
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
16144 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

All I'm saying is that this is a tale as old as time, people bitch about tourists and then the tourists go away and tons of jobs are lost and small businesses close down.


I agree with your general point but Venice is such a desired destination people will still flock and there one way or another.
Posted by hungryone
river parishes
Member since Sep 2010
11987 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

I have mixed feelings about it, because I think it would be kind of shitty that only people with money can enjoy the world's greatest treasures.

Timed entry tickets to things like the Louvre and limiting overall number of visitors per day aren't necessarily reducing access to the rich: they ensure a decent visitor experience for everyone, regardless of the price paid. Smaller museums have done this for years (like the Galleria Borghese in Rome)....but the bigger ones use mass entry as a cash cow.

A museum can easily reserve a certain number of daily tickets for walk-up guests who arrive by a certain time, or have a daily lottery for last minute tickets, or offer free entry on certain days (like last Sunday of month for Vatican museums).
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
30250 posts
Posted on 7/14/21 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

Just read that Italy’s government has banned cruise ships from docking in Venice or even entering the Venetian harbor. As someone who loves Venice but not the overcrowding caused by big boat day tripping masses, pretty awesome news.


The wife and I stopped in Venice on a cruise ship once. Docking them further out isn't going to alleviate overcrowding.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram