- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PK abuse has ruined soccer...i propose a fix
Posted on 6/12/14 at 5:20 pm to Iona Fan Man
Posted on 6/12/14 at 5:20 pm to Iona Fan Man
quote:
The only way to fix it is to start retroactively banning players.
This. Have a committee review the tape, suspend Fred for three games, and rescind the yellow card (Lovren?).
Posted on 6/12/14 at 5:23 pm to NOTORlOUSD
quote:
Have a committee
that should work just fine. Let's see... a committee to review game decisions in a FIFA tournament. So... a committee selected by and comprised of FIFA representatives/members. Yep. I see it. That would solve everything.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 5:25 pm to Dandy Lion
quote:
No, I meant to say, there wouldn´t be any dropoff in play with Fred banned.
It has nothing to do with the dropoff in play. If a player is retroactively suspended for diving, then, in theory, other players won't dive for fear of suspension.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 5:27 pm to Iona Fan Man
The fundamental issue is that very few goals are scored in soccer, and a foul called in the penalty practically gives a goal away. Much of the time these end up deciding the game. That's too stiff a penalty for the crime, and it gives the ref too much power over the outcome of the game. Perhaps this could be alleviated by just moving the spot for penalty shots back so that it isn't such a gimme. Maybe penalty shots could be taken from the edge of the penalty area. With no one in front as they are now this is probably closer to a 50/50 proposition.
Edt: You could also keep the current spot and use it for flagrant fouls.
Edt: You could also keep the current spot and use it for flagrant fouls.
This post was edited on 6/12/14 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 6/12/14 at 5:28 pm to Broski
quote:It´s called ´taking one for the team´.
It has nothing to do with the dropoff in play. If a player is retroactively suspended for diving, then, in theory, other players won't dive for fear of suspension.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 5:30 pm to Dandy Lion
quote:
It´s called ´taking one for the team´.
If some of the worst divers like Suarez, Robben or Neymar "took one for the team" and got three game suspensions, that would be a severe price to pay.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 5:32 pm to Broski
Rather than a ban, I think a tape review and post-game yellow cards for diving/flopping would probably be sufficient. It would seriously cut down the problem.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 5:32 pm to NOTORlOUSD
quote:We´re talking about Fred, and Scolari´s Brazil.......
If some of the worst divers like Suarez, Robben or Neymar "took one for the team" and got three game suspensions, that would be a severe price to pay.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 5:33 pm to DocBugbear
I could get behind "top of box"
Posted on 6/12/14 at 5:34 pm to Dandy Lion
quote:
We´re talking about Fred, and Scolari´s Brazil.......
I don't think you have any idea what anyone, or even yourself, is talking about.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 5:40 pm to Broski
quote:Fred is just another replaceable cog. The side would not suffer.
I don't think you have any idea what anyone, or even yourself, is talking about.
You people correlating this to others diving, that are of supreme worth to their sides, are missing the point.
It was a calculated risk, with little to no downside (not only because he´s ´expendable´, but because the pressure on the ref, which was already palpable in his actions to this point, was quite high). He gets the penalty, saves his side, and all are happy. He f´s up, he gets a yellow.
There is nothing complicated about this. Fred misses some matches? They´ve won their opening match, and a lot of pressure is off. He´s not primordial to his side´s success normally, so there is no suffering (as many purport with reference to other sides and players), going forward.
This post was edited on 6/12/14 at 5:44 pm
Posted on 6/12/14 at 8:05 pm to Meursault
I'm going to start threads during football season proposing that defensive lineman should wear razors on their arms, because Offensive Holding is out of control.
Also, we should raise basketball goals to 18 feet, and push the three point line out to mid-court, because all the players do is dunk and shoot threes.
Also, we should raise basketball goals to 18 feet, and push the three point line out to mid-court, because all the players do is dunk and shoot threes.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 8:14 pm to Sheep
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/12/23 at 8:12 am
Posted on 6/12/14 at 10:54 pm to TheIrishFro
The Pk thing isn't ridiculous. A lot of actual soccer fans and commentators think the rule is too harsh, and gives referees to big an influence on games. Remember Ghana's penalty against us in 06? These questionable fouls at the top of the box in situations that would lead to a goal 5% of the time then become pk's which have a roughly 80% conversion rate. I don't know if there's a better solution or not, but it is a problem and "well this is all we've always done it" isn't always a good reason to not change
Posted on 6/13/14 at 12:46 am to Dandy Lion
quote:
There is nothing complicated about this. Fred misses some matches? They´ve won their opening match, and a lot of pressure is off. He´s not primordial to his side´s success normally, so there is no suffering (as many purport with reference to other sides and players), going forward.
this is a rule that applies to more than just this instance in this game. for example, neymar's bullshite would get him banned for his dive against real this year. robben and suarez are notorious in this regard as well
Posted on 6/13/14 at 1:04 am to SlowFlowPro
This is a rule which does not exist, hence my point all through the thread.
Were it to exist, Fred still did the right thing.
Why do you people keep postulating about what could have been (in any scenario)?
Were it to exist, Fred still did the right thing.
Why do you people keep postulating about what could have been (in any scenario)?
Posted on 6/13/14 at 1:17 am to Dandy Lion
They should ban players. A player can receive a red card for kicking the ball away, which has no effect on the game what so ever.
Posted on 6/13/14 at 2:18 am to dgnx6
quote:yellow
A player can receive a red card for kicking the ball away,
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News