Started By
Message

re: Official: Klinsmann named head coach - press conference Monday in NYC

Posted on 8/2/11 at 12:45 pm to
Posted by Drew Orleans
Member since Mar 2010
21577 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 12:45 pm to
Exactly. That goal started with the long ball but it was played at an angle and redirected. If you are going to play the longball that's how you do it.


Also, I agree about Ream. He royally fricked up the other day but I still like the way he plays D.
Posted by RedPop4
Santiago de Compostela
Member since Jan 2005
15291 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

quote:
Things wrong with Skeletor:

2. Inability to start a game with a winning strategy (Slovenia, Panama, Ghana)


I don't think there's a leader on the field. Either Bocanegra doesn't organize or can't. Donovan and Dempsey, and I think, Cherundolo are "playing" leaders (i.e. Do As I Do), not vocal leaders. I'm never a big fan of goalkeepers as captains, because they're always yelling.... it's hard to tell when it matters.

So, I'm not removing blame from Bob about the slow starts, but I'm placing the large part of that on the players. I can assure you that the pre-game speeches didn't consist of "just wander around out there for a bit.... if you give the ball away in the center circle... don't sweat it." Come on.

However, Bob has to identify and/or develop a captain, and I think he failed in that regard. I also think that part of the problem toward the end was Michael trying to be that vocal leader, and the rest of the team pushing back on the kid that doesn't play anywhere trying to take over.


Solid, yet again.
Posted by joey barton
Member since Feb 2011
11468 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Time after time the defenders would play the ball from just beyond their own 3rd. They wouldn't switch the fields either, they would just serve it straight down the field hoping someone would be able to magically run a 4.1 and be able to chase it down


yeah, that's probably not how their thought process went

it was probably:

1. i'm being closed down, or i can't pick out a pass, or no one is showing for the ball
2. panic
3. play the safe, but undesirable, ball down the field

it isn't a direct attack on our players. every center back in the world does it at some point or another. that is a hell of a lot better than:

1. shite, i shouldn't have played that ball/gotten caught in possession
2. panic
3. goal

the problem wasn't systemic, wrt bob bradley's tactics, anyway.
This post was edited on 8/2/11 at 1:58 pm
Posted by Sheep
Neither here nor there
Member since Jun 2007
19696 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 2:05 pm to
quote:


it isn't a direct attack on our players. every center back in the world does it at some point or another. that is a hell of a lot better than:

1. shite, i shouldn't have played that ball/gotten caught in possession
2. panic
3. goal


True.

We saved this part until the ball got to midfield.
Posted by joey barton
Member since Feb 2011
11468 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 2:41 pm to
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160203 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 2:46 pm to
That should be an auto-ban for posting it.
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
21041 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 2:50 pm to
What is it? I can't view it at work.
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9417 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

thought that basically every goal we've given up in the past two years has come from a giveaway while we tried to play possession through the midfield.


I would say that Bradley was increasingly trying to bring us out of the bunker style and this where our defensive problems have come in.

I have mixed feelings about the change. Everyone's gaga with attack attack attack or possess the ball like Barca does but that's going to get us beaten like yard dogs by good teams (or even some of the athletic pacy counterattacking teams we meet in qualifying like Panama.)

We played the bunker defense and counter attack style very well in the past. It was our identity and we often punched above our weight employing it.

I can see that opening up our game a bit especially if this filters all the way to down to developing more technically proficient players as a positive for the future but I'm not sure that it pan out results wise short term any better for Klinsmann than it did for Bradley.

Again, I'm not opposed to the change at all but it's at best a long term plan whereas a manager that would have us playing like Greece or Paraguay would actually probably see better short term results until we have the midfield players that can actually possess the ball without disastrous turnovers.

Posted by Sheep
Neither here nor there
Member since Jun 2007
19696 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 3:01 pm to
Playing the first 30 minutes of every game that mattered with a very strict 4-4-1-1 would have generated better results than trying to "take it to them."

It would have been ugly and boring, but winning isn't.

Trying to dictate play when you don't have the ability is going to get you roasted more often than not.
Posted by Drew Orleans
Member since Mar 2010
21577 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 3:05 pm to
Several times it wasn't a center back and was played with little to no pressure.
Posted by LSUCanFAN
In the past
Member since Jan 2009
28100 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 3:15 pm to
This is frickin' fantastic news! :nana: :cheers: :cheers:
Posted by joey barton
Member since Feb 2011
11468 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 3:33 pm to
probably
Posted by joey barton
Member since Feb 2011
11468 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Several times


='s

quote:

Bob-ball(boom ball)
?

and, you don't need pressure to have a, "what the frick do i do?" moment

ETA: i would be marginally more convinced of that argument if tim ream didn't come in and do the exact opposite. if bob bradley said anything, i'm sure that most of the time it was, "don't play balls that you aren't comfortable playing."
This post was edited on 8/2/11 at 3:50 pm
Posted by Drew Orleans
Member since Mar 2010
21577 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 4:42 pm to
Well no shite. Regardless, if the ball is consistently being played far down field without switching or at least playing it at an angle it meets the requirments of boom ball. Yes Ream plays just the opposite but every other defender on Bob's old team does that shite.
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9417 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

ETA: i would be marginally more convinced of that argument if tim ream didn't come in and do the exact opposite. if bob bradley said anything, i'm sure that most of the time it was, "don't play balls that you aren't comfortable playing."


Exactly. I can't understand why so many people think our defenders launch too many balls because Bradley told them "when you're in your back third don't even look to pass just close your eyes and kick the hell out of it".

The best defenders in the world launch balls out of play when they're not comfortable with an outlet. The problem is that our defenders are often too slow to see a passing angle develop or there's really not a passing angle there because of mids not moving into the best space.

Some of that positioning can be coaching but it's also just having vision of the pitch developing, which, for as much as people talk about first touch is just as much what distinguishes elite players.

We actually seem to get in the most trouble when we try too one touch passing through the midfield. It's more likely to result in a break coming right back at us than vice versa.

This post was edited on 8/2/11 at 5:42 pm
Posted by joey barton
Member since Feb 2011
11468 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

Yes Ream plays just the opposite but every other defender on Bob's old team does that shite.


so, who else could he call in that wouldn't at that level?

as wm72 pointed out, it is not easy. this is a problem with american soccer, not bob bradley. bob bradley did some things wrong and some things right. this one was neither of those.
Posted by Sheep
Neither here nor there
Member since Jun 2007
19696 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 7:03 pm to
Fun fact: "Bunker Bob and "Bob Ball" never really existed.

Discuss.

quote:

bob bradley did some things wrong and some things right. this one was neither of those.


On this point... as I've said before... Bob's primary coaching issues were:

A. Not finding a leader.
B. Trying to play a system (possession, slow buildup) that our personnel wasn't capable of.

If he would have stuck two big center backs in the middle, SAT Clark (I know, I know) and Bradley RIGHT in front of them, clogged the middle, and just attacked down the wings and crossed the ball in, we would have had better results. Ugly results, but better results.

Bob shot for "progress" and either couldn't coach the players he had, or couldn't find the players to coach what he was trying to do. In the end, it was probably something in between.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44201 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

or couldn't find the players to coach what he was trying to do. In the end, it was probably something in between.



This is what I feel too. I say we only have a handful of legit players against top flight competition. Timmy Howard, Landon Donovan (when he doesn't have to defend), Bradley (very under-rated imo), and Dempsey are the best we have with any consistancy. Lets be honest, they are the only ones that would even get a sniff if they were at a top tier national squad (Spain, Germany, etc.) We have other guys that are solid but nothing special. As to an earlier post about our best players training in Europe, I meant training, not playing. Donovan trained there etc. Only a couple of Americans get time at the highest level in Europe. I just don't think we have the talent. Based on Klinsmann's reponse (changing the "US system from the ground up -which I agree with), I think he sees a hard job ahead of him due to an overall lack of talent. I could be wrong, only time will tell. At any rate -go USA!
Posted by Wario Balotelli
Member since Jun 2011
175 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 8:44 pm to
Re: Bob Ball.

It felt like we defaulted to aimless kicking at times, but that wasn't indicative of a planned tactic. It highlighted a consistent lack of composure, which might be an indictment of American soccer as a whole rather than a particular proclivity of Bob's. This lack of composure manifested itself in other ways and in other games.

Klinsmann, with his insistence on playing attacking football, has a large job ahead of him, in attempting to teach something that is perhaps intangible.
Posted by Drew Orleans
Member since Mar 2010
21577 posts
Posted on 8/2/11 at 9:37 pm to
Then teach your team to make runs and flash to the ball or something (not that they shouldn't already know that shite). Jesus, why is this even an argument? We play boom-ball and Bob did nothing to change our game plan.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram