- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: my thoughts on the USMNT
Posted on 5/28/12 at 2:01 am to UASports23
Posted on 5/28/12 at 2:01 am to UASports23
So is it for certain that Chandler won't be playing for us ever again?
Posted on 5/28/12 at 2:15 am to crazy4lsu
Klinsy didnt sound too happy about him snubbing the invite to camp. He is probably still holding on to hope that he will break into the German pool (unlikely at this point). If he came to camp he would have played in a qualifier, locking him to the US. This was probably a big influence in his decision. On the other hand, Johnson and Boyd seem to have no issue with this as both will probably play in qualifiers and be US players for life.
Posted on 5/28/12 at 3:34 am to UASports23
You could probably argue that the current squad is stronger than what Bradley had to work with.
I am pretty alright with Klinsmann right now. Can't foresee my opinion changing unless he does something retarded.
I am pretty alright with Klinsmann right now. Can't foresee my opinion changing unless he does something retarded.
Posted on 5/28/12 at 3:36 am to Vicks Kennel Club
quote:
Jones, Bradley, Torres? (hopefully Stubear will return)
Edu allows Bradley and Jones to play a more expansive game
I'm not sure that we should move away from that
Posted on 5/28/12 at 4:32 am to joey barton
Boyd is super happy to be representing the USMNT, and Johnson always looks happy to be on the field. Glad to have both of them playing with the US

Posted on 5/28/12 at 7:11 am to TN Bhoy
quote:
TN Bhoy
Your posts are just chock full of optimism and sunshine eh?
Posted on 5/28/12 at 10:04 am to joey barton
quote:
You could probably argue that the current squad is stronger than what Bradley had to work with.
Yea, the pool is deeper right now. I'll agree. I'm not sure that Bradley could have brought Fabian and Danny in or was going to do so. The other younger kids, Bradley was starting to pull them in, just got fired before he could do so.
The only bad thing about Bradley was some of the questionable roster calls. It seems like Klinsmann has done a MUCH better job with our rosters.
Here is the US v South Africa youthful roster that Bradley called up. We won the game, South Africa brought their World Cup roster.
quote:
GK: Dominic Cervi, Brad Guzan,
DEF: Jonathon Spector, Tim Ream, Eric Lichaj, Clarence Goodson, Jonathan Bornstein, Nat Borchers, Gale Agbossoumonde
MID: Alejandro Bedoya, Brian Carroll, Mikkel Diskerud, Eddie Gaven, Logan Pause, Robbie Rogers
FOR: Robbie Findley, Teal Bunbury, Juan Agudelo
Posted on 5/28/12 at 11:06 am to UASports23
quote:
It seems like Klinsmann has done a MUCH better job with our rosters.
Posted on 5/28/12 at 11:27 am to joey barton
quote:
Edu allows Bradley and Jones to play a more expansive game I'm not sure that we should move away from that
Makes sense. I really do not know that much compared to you and a lot of the other posters on here. I am happy with how this roster is shaping up.
I put Holden in parenthesis cause that is just a pipe dream. We really cannot plan on him being a starter for the US at this point for 2014.
I think one of the best attributes that our team has is the combination of strength, size, and fitness. I feel like this is why we have played better in the second half in a lot of games and we are able to hang with the big dogs some of the time.
Posted on 5/28/12 at 11:52 am to Vicks Kennel Club
I love how committed Klinsy is to all of the players and how transparent his coaching is. I kind of thought it was crazy when he cut the 4 guys out of this camp in front of the whole team, but he made sure everyone knew what those 4 had put in and that they were part of the USMNT family. As hard as he drives these players, they all seem to like him quite a lot. I think it's unfair to compare him to bradley since their philosophies are so different.
Posted on 5/28/12 at 12:42 pm to americanoutlaw
If Klinsy at coach means no Bornstein, I won't complain.
But yeah, we seem more creative, more in sync right now. We'll see if that carries into qualifying.
But yeah, we seem more creative, more in sync right now. We'll see if that carries into qualifying.
Posted on 5/28/12 at 2:28 pm to AUin02
I'm eager to see the effects of JK 20 to 30 years from now.
Posted on 5/28/12 at 2:33 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
quote:
I think that may be a top 20-25 team in the world that could get to the knockout rounds and maybe even win a game with a decent draw (not against those fricks from Ghana).
We've been that for almost two decades now, outside of the Steve Sampson era. I think we are a legit top 15 squad now.
I think 2002 was the turning point with all of the incredible young talent we had. Some didn't pan out due to injuries (O'Brien and Convey), others didn't keep up their performance levels (DaMarcus), but we had some real stars develop in that time period, guys who are still on the NT.
I think this is the strongest we have ever been in midfield and attack. Our outside backs are also very good, at least on par with the 2002 squad. On the other hand, I am worried about the future of the central defense. Onyewu and Goodson at 30+ and Bocanegra at 33 and reduced speed should not be our best central defense options.
Posted on 5/28/12 at 2:42 pm to RollTide4Ever
quote:
I'm eager to see the effects of JK 20 to 30 years from now.
Hopefully not too eager..
Posted on 5/28/12 at 2:48 pm to Keys Open Doors
quote:
I think we are a legit top 15 squad now.
I'm as happy anyone with how well we played against Scotland but I'd say we're pretty much in the mix equally with all the 20 or so countries that fall in the 15-35 range.
To say we're a legit top 15 to me is saying that we're clearly better than some teams like Russia or Belgium or Columbia etc and I'm not convinced this is the case.
Posted on 5/28/12 at 2:58 pm to wm72
Oh, this has nothing to do with the Scotland game, even though I have never seen the US toy with an opponent like that, outside of the CONCACAF minnows.
I was basing it off of international competition, especially our performances in the World Cup.
I was basing it off of international competition, especially our performances in the World Cup.
Posted on 5/28/12 at 3:05 pm to Keys Open Doors
quote:
even though I have never seen the US toy with an opponent like tha
I agree. This was so good to see for once!
The only problem with judging top 15 from the world cup is simply that any given WC you may have 10+ European and a few South American teams fully capable of making it into the knockout rounds or quarters who didn't even qualify.
That's just why I feel that we're still around par with Belgium etc. but luckily don't have to qualify for the WC out of Europe.
Posted on 5/28/12 at 3:18 pm to wm72
I have often thought how we would do through a euro or uefa WC qualifying schedule...would we quaIffy outright, win in the playoffs? Guess we will never know
Posted on 5/28/12 at 3:34 pm to Harry Pitts
FWIW, we are one of twelve to qualify for every WC since 1998. We are also one of seven to qualify for every WC since 1990, but that includes our hosting in 1994 and benefiting from Mexico's DQ in 1990.
Since 1990:
Italy
Argentina
Brazil
West Germany/Germany
Spain
South Korea
United States
Since 1998:
Japan
Mexico
Paraguay
England
France
Since 1990:
Italy
Argentina
Brazil
West Germany/Germany
Spain
South Korea
United States
Since 1998:
Japan
Mexico
Paraguay
England
France
Popular
Back to top


2







