- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How badly will we outnumber Ghana fans?
Posted on 6/14/14 at 7:55 am to ohiovol
Posted on 6/14/14 at 7:55 am to ohiovol
quote:
We did buy about 150,000 total tickets, I believe. Obviously there are repeats and people who aren't going to watch the USA, but we should dominate the stadium.
Which would be to many for all US matches. So clearly people are going to other games. Many of my friends have already been to a game.
Having 10-15k is pretty much dominating a stadium in the WC when you are that far from home. Attendance figures are highly dependent on the locals.
Also take into account people who live in the states from other countries going to brazil. Some Dutch guy drove all the way from San Francisco
This post was edited on 6/14/14 at 7:56 am
Posted on 6/14/14 at 7:58 am to NOTORlOUSD
quote:
This is what makes the OP's statement possible. A US-Mexico WC match at Azteca would have the ticket demand of the Super Bowl. It wouldn't be a question of who wanted to go, but who could pay the most.
Locals get the first chance/cheaper.
A Mexican WC game in Mexico is dominated by Mexicans regardless of popularity in the states.
Posted on 6/14/14 at 8:02 am to engvol
quote:
Locals get the first chance/cheaper.
Yup don't know how many times this has to be explained to people.
The WC highly depends on the locals not the traveling fans esp when its for games less in demand. We could be lucky as frick to get 20k in the Azteca for a WC final vs Mexico and it would be a security nightmare.
Posted on 6/14/14 at 8:03 am to StraightCashHomey21
This thread sucks...
...lets sticky it
...lets sticky it
Posted on 6/14/14 at 8:14 am to Broski
you been more pissed off than me since this thing kicked off
Posted on 6/14/14 at 8:15 am to StraightCashHomey21
I'm on edge bro.
Posted on 6/14/14 at 8:19 am to thesoccerfanjax
quote:And Virginia is?
Texas and Arizona aren't America.
Posted on 6/14/14 at 8:23 am to Dalosaqy
quote:
And Virginia is?
you damn right Virgina is
one of the most influential states in American history
Posted on 6/14/14 at 8:25 am to StraightCashHomey21
Remember Jamestown!!!
Posted on 6/14/14 at 8:29 am to NOTORlOUSD
quote:
This is what makes the OP's statement possible. A US-Mexico WC match at Azteca would have the ticket demand of the Super Bowl. It wouldn't be a question of who wanted to go, but who could pay the most.
There are plenty of rich Mexicans. We wouldn't have a prayer of filling Azteca if we're playing Mexico.
Posted on 6/14/14 at 8:30 am to ohiovol
quote:
There are plenty of rich Mexicans. We wouldn't have a prayer of filling Azteca if we're playing Mexico.
Yea per capita Mexico city alone has a frick ton of millionaires
Posted on 6/14/14 at 8:31 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Which would be to many for all US matches. So clearly people are going to other games. Many of my friends have already been to a game.
Having 10-15k is pretty much dominating a stadium in the WC when you are that far from home. Attendance figures are highly dependent on the locals.
Also take into account people who live in the states from other countries going to brazil. Some Dutch guy drove all the way from San Francisco
Fair enough. Anybody know how many Mexicans were in Natal yesterday? Can we beat that?
Posted on 6/14/14 at 8:35 am to ohiovol
quote:
Fair enough. Anybody know how many Mexicans were in Natal yesterday? Can we beat that?
No clue but they travel well to every world cup b/c their upper middle class is pretty wealthy.
Its great to see our fans traveling so much even if its not the US games. Traveling for sporting events is really not in the American culture let alone getting out and seeing the world.
Best example is Australia they had 15k fans last night even though they are the worst ranked team in the WC. But this is part of not just their sports culture but their culture in general. Most Aussies in their mid 20's go see the world before coming home and settling down.
Posted on 6/14/14 at 9:08 am to ohiovol
Attendance was 39 k yesterday and about 75% Mexican.
I haven't seen nearly the amount of USA fans here so far but they nah not be arriving just yet.
Also many Mexicans I talked to are from the states and are going to both games and rooting for both Mexico and us.
I haven't seen nearly the amount of USA fans here so far but they nah not be arriving just yet.
Also many Mexicans I talked to are from the states and are going to both games and rooting for both Mexico and us.
Posted on 6/14/14 at 9:21 am to ohiovol
To answer your question...yes we will outnumber Ghana but nothing ridiculous like half the stadium. There will obviously be more Brazilians than anyone so it all depends on who they side with.
Posted on 6/14/14 at 9:39 am to ohiovol
quote:
Anybody know how many Mexicans were in Natal yesterday? Can we beat that?
One USA fan/blogger who was at the game guessed 33,000. Apparently Mexicans are everywhere in Brazil
This post was edited on 6/14/14 at 9:41 am
Posted on 6/14/14 at 9:41 am to Palmetto08
quote:
One USA fan/blogger who was at the game guessed 33,000. Apparently Mexicans are everywhere in Brazil
out of 39k
no chance
Posted on 6/14/14 at 9:45 am to ohiovol
quote:
Anybody know how many Mexicans were in Natal yesterday? Can we beat that?
1. A lot
2. No
Posted on 6/14/14 at 12:08 pm to StraightCashHomey21
And Texas is not? What are your protocols here, Senator?
Posted on 6/14/14 at 12:13 pm to StraightCashHomey21
I don't know which is more absurd someone thinking we will have 25k in the stands tomorrow or thinking we would get 40k into Azteca in the reasonably near future.
Popular
Back to top


3




