- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:31 am to Decatur
quote:
Get over it.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:34 am to Wednesday
quote:
The main one? Maybe SFP will finally STFU.
If voter fraud in Georgia is ever proven, SFP will be making threads about how he said all along that there was voter fraud and if you didn’t understand that, it’s your problem.
It is more likely that SFP spontaneously combusts than he ever shuts up
This post was edited on 2/3/26 at 8:37 am
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The election fraud theory
Lazy faggotry.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:45 am to the808bass
quote:
If voter fraud in Georgia is ever proven, SFP will be making threads about how he said all along that there was voter fraud and if you didn’t understand that, it’s your problem.
Wrong. My stance is clear. I'm waiting on the credible/direct evidence.
I haven't come down on one side or the other yet. I'm waiting on the evidence.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:48 am to themunch
quote:
Atlanta will burn.
Again.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm waiting on the credible/direct evidence.
Which is almost entirely subjective. There's plenty of evidence, but whether or not it's credible or enough to constitute proof is in the eye of the beholder.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:50 am to Flats
The direct variable is going to be the tougher one, FWIW.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:50 am to the808bass
quote:
It is more likely that SFP spontaneously combusts than he ever shuts up
Posted on 2/3/26 at 8:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The direct variable is going to be the tougher one, FWIW.
Sure, because that's also subjective. If you're the arbitrator of what's "direct" then nothing can force you to accept any evidence at all as "direct".
Posted on 2/3/26 at 9:02 am to Sweep Da Leg
quote:
It’s amazing how you continue to be such an intellectually dishonest hack. There’s WIDESPREAD EVIDENCE already out there. It will take you five minutes to find it on X
I think SFP will remain skeptical until /unless it were ever people that he personally deems “credible” who were to say so.
So, a “traditional MSM talking head on ABC or CBS or NBC… or well-known traditional establishment political figure(s), etc.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 9:04 am to Great Plains Drifter
I want to get rid of those two awful senators they have. I'll never believe they won fairly.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 9:15 am to Flats
quote:
Proof or evidence? They get used interchangeably here but they're different.
Good point.
Again, to reiterate my position, I'm assuming fraud took place, because it does every election. And there is video evidence from 2020 that shows people committing fraud. We already know fraud took place. That evidence is already in and was in shortly after the election.
The real question in my mind is whether fraud took place to the degree that it flipped the election. And Georgia and Arizona IMO are the likeliest suspects for that to have happened on a state level based on the changes in total votes cast between 2016 and 2020.
So when I say that I'm looking for them to find evidence that there were really more votes cast for Trump than Biden in Georgia (which is what Trump is saying they have). And that's just math. They either find the votes that weren't counted (or verify some that were counted as fraudulent) or they don't.
I also would be very happy for them to find evidence strong enough that it could successfully be used to prosecute someone in court even if it doesn't show that Trump got more votes than Biden. Or even evidence that would be strong enough to be used in court except that the responsible person's name was redacted, or something of that nature.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:19 am to SlowFlowPro
The election fraud will become an historical event IF normal/honest/moral governance can once again be obtained.
I wrote the following as response to a different poster but would rather address it to you.
Oh - I am over it - I am convinced nothing will - or CAN - be done now to remedy the obvious mishandling of the 2020 election.io
IN FACT - as this term is unfolding, I am ENCOURAGED that we may come out of it better than if Trump has served his rightful 2nd term already.
First, he has had time to more fully vet his cabinet nominees with demonstrated achievements and alliances that he would not have benefited from in 2020.
Second, the nation has seen just how absolutely miserable a DIM presidency can be. There will never be another disaster like what the dems saddled us with in 2020 - nobody would have believed the disaster they can produce.
Even with the attempt to overwhelm our population with millions of illegal names to put onto the voting registries, we may be able to head that off IF we can get legislation to require better custody/maintenance of those registries and IF we can enforce SANE VOTING PROCESSES.
The public has been given a rare side by side comparison of sane governance vs insane governance.
IF we can ensure a valid election process in 2028, we may be able to survive as a sane, responsible, moral nation.
If not - then it's been a good ride - we had our chance and blew it. Sucks to be us.
I wrote the following as response to a different poster but would rather address it to you.
quote:
Get over it.
Oh - I am over it - I am convinced nothing will - or CAN - be done now to remedy the obvious mishandling of the 2020 election.io
IN FACT - as this term is unfolding, I am ENCOURAGED that we may come out of it better than if Trump has served his rightful 2nd term already.
First, he has had time to more fully vet his cabinet nominees with demonstrated achievements and alliances that he would not have benefited from in 2020.
Second, the nation has seen just how absolutely miserable a DIM presidency can be. There will never be another disaster like what the dems saddled us with in 2020 - nobody would have believed the disaster they can produce.
Even with the attempt to overwhelm our population with millions of illegal names to put onto the voting registries, we may be able to head that off IF we can get legislation to require better custody/maintenance of those registries and IF we can enforce SANE VOTING PROCESSES.
The public has been given a rare side by side comparison of sane governance vs insane governance.
IF we can ensure a valid election process in 2028, we may be able to survive as a sane, responsible, moral nation.
If not - then it's been a good ride - we had our chance and blew it. Sucks to be us.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:22 am to MikkUGA
quote:
So I guess 9k voters registered to two addresses or the fact they have found hard drives whose DLL folders were altered over 500 times after being verified is not credible sources.
Again, the issue there is more the "direct" portion.
You can find credible evidence of all sorts of randomness, but you need to have a direct tie in to fraudulent voting as well.
So 9k people are registered to a single address, for example. You need to figure out that fraud was involved, that they voted, who they voted for, etc. That kind of shite.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:24 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
The real question in my mind is whether fraud took place to the degree that it flipped the election. And Georgia and Arizona IMO are the likeliest suspects for that to have happened on a state level based on the changes in total votes cast between 2016 and 2020.
The real question in my mind is whether the fraud was organized and if it happened using DNC assets. Yeah, somebody always votes for Grandma, that's fraud, but it's not going to change an election. Organized, deliberate fraud in specific pressure points can.
It doesn't really matter if it would have made a difference in the outcome because the outcome can't be reversed, and that was true about 2-3 days after the election. I guess it could be a positive in that it would get peoples' attention more, but keeping this from happening again is what I think is important. And I think it's important whether the election outcome was impacted or not.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:26 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
be very happy for them to find evidence strong enough that it could successfully be used to prosecute someone in court even if it doesn't show that Trump got more votes than Biden. Or even evidence that would be strong enough to be used in court except that the responsible person's name was redacted, or something of that nature.
/\ THIS /\
Nothing can undo the grave damage done to our republic in 2020 - but we MUST keep that tragedy in mind to ensure "never again."
Just as you can never undo a murder, we can always try to prevent the situation that played a part in the murder itself.
Democrats are now essentially ADVERTISING that they need fraudulent votes to HAVE A CHANCE at winning again in any but the most corrupt states.
Just look at what people DO rather than what they SAY - that is all that a normal person need to do in evaluating truth vs fiction.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:26 am to Flats
quote:
The real question in my mind is whether the fraud was organized and if it happened using DNC assets.
That's certainly going to be the next area of focus if they can find the direct/credible evidence.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:27 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Raffenberger couldn’t find them. How much you wanna bet Pam does?
Trolling failure. Raffenberger knew that fraud could only be discovered by forensic audit. It's why he never would call for it. It's also why January 6th was staged. So they could suspend rules and push Georgia and other State's through without risk of their votes being sent back. Being sent back would have automatically required a forensic audit conducted under sole authority of the Georgia legislature.
Posted on 2/3/26 at 10:28 am to riccoar
quote:
Being sent back would have automatically required a forensic audit
Based on what, exactly?
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News