Started By
Message

re: “You’ll know my opinion on court packing when the election is over.” Link added to OP

Posted on 10/8/20 at 3:30 pm to
Posted by TigerOnTheMountain
Higher Elevation
Member since Oct 2014
41773 posts
Posted on 10/8/20 at 3:30 pm to
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108972 posts
Posted on 10/8/20 at 3:30 pm to
They’re still dumb, but I think calling them dumb let’s them off the hook a little bit. Don Lemon and Chris Cuomo are dumber than shite, but their master Jeff Zucker is not. He’s a power hungry monster that the world would be better off without. It’s about power and they’re doing it “in the name” of democracy. My point is they don’t want democracy either, but they’re using that as their mask to hide what they’re actually after: power to control you. Jeff Zucker would force you what to eat if he had the power to do so.
Posted by TigerOnTheMountain
Higher Elevation
Member since Oct 2014
41773 posts
Posted on 10/8/20 at 3:35 pm to
I listened to them some last night and those motherfrickers are the dumbest people on TV.
Posted by jatilen
Member since May 2020
13608 posts
Posted on 10/8/20 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Daily Caller on Twitter


That's such a devastating video clip. A presidential candidate is openly telling voters they will know his opinion on an important issue only after the election is over. Trump needs to make it a centerpiece of his ads.
This post was edited on 10/8/20 at 3:37 pm
Posted by Jeff Boomhauer
Arlen, TX
Member since Jun 2016
3552 posts
Posted on 10/8/20 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

“It’s a legitimate question. But let me tell you why I’m not going to answer that question: because it will shift all the focus. That’s what he wants,” Biden told Action 2 News. “He never wants to talk about the issue at hand. He always tries to change the subject.”


Amazing. He's actually deflecting a question and trying to change the subject and accusing Trump of deflecting questions and trying to change the subject all in the same sentence.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
29981 posts
Posted on 10/8/20 at 3:43 pm to
I just can’t even believe how open they are being.

Their base is rabid.

Also shows me they are scared to lose support by denying their intent.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108972 posts
Posted on 10/8/20 at 3:43 pm to
“If I answer that, then the headlines in all of your papers will be about that.”

Yeah, no shite. It’s what should be the headline. Our country can’t survive starting court packing, especially if Kamala Harris gets the ball rolling.
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
5896 posts
Posted on 10/8/20 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

Mark Kelly


What a bought-and-paid-for scumbag that guy turned out to be.
Posted by jatilen
Member since May 2020
13608 posts
Posted on 10/8/20 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

What a bought-and-paid-for scumbag that guy turned out to be.


Yep. His response at the debate when questioned about the filibuster was just as bad:
quote:

Lorraine Rivera of Arizona Public Media asked Kelly if he would invoke the filibuster to delay the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court.

“If you are in the Senate, would you support a filibuster to delay the nomination?” she asked.

(The premise of the question was somewhat inaccurate: the filibuster no longer exists for Supreme Court nominees.)

Kelly argued, incorrectly, that Republicans had “abolished the filibuster” to pass a tax cut and to repeal Obamacare. (They used reconciliation, which only requires 50 votes — the same way Obamacare was passed in 2010.)

He finally arrived at his answer on the filibuster: “I will give it thoughtful consideration, and I’m going to do what’s in the best interest of Arizona and our country, not what it’s the best interest of one political party or the other.”

Rivera asked the question again: “Mr. Kelly, you’ve been a candidate for more than a year. Many people think that you should already have an answer to that question.”

“We don’t know if this is even going to come up for — even a discussion,” he protested. “It might — and if it does, I will give it thoughtful consideration.”

Democrats have already begun calling openly for the filibuster to be eliminated. Former President Barack Obama did so at the funeral for Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) in July, for example.

Moderator Yvonne Wingett Sanchez of the Arizona Republic later retuned to the question. “Mr. Kelly, who do you need to hear from to form an opinion on the filibuster question?”

“I’ll need to hear from Arizonans,” Kelly said, adding: “When I make that decision, I will let Arizonans know.” He claimed again that the topic had not come up for discussion, and that Arizonans did not care about “a rule in the United States Senate.”


LINK
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57375 posts
Posted on 10/8/20 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

“You’ll know my opinion on court packing when the election is over.”
"you have to pass teh bill to find out what's in it"
"You have to elect me to find out what my policies will be".

Why do democrats have difficulty telling us who they are and what they want to do?
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20032 posts
Posted on 10/8/20 at 4:57 pm to
I lol’d at pence last night when he finally said “if you haven’t figured it out by now the answer is yes”
Posted by TigerFanNSTC
Member since Sep 2019
64 posts
Posted on 10/8/20 at 7:44 pm to
So you agree Congress would have to agree and pass a bill.

I like finding common ground with everyone.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80415 posts
Posted on 10/8/20 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

Kind of like the Republicans not being bound to wait to see what the American people say during an election year.


President Trump's current term ends in January of 2021, not October of 2020.
Posted by TigerFanNSTC
Member since Sep 2019
64 posts
Posted on 10/8/20 at 9:53 pm to
Did the Republicans put Garland to a vote after the election? I must have missed it.
Posted by TigerOnTheMountain
Higher Elevation
Member since Oct 2014
41773 posts
Posted on 10/8/20 at 10:00 pm to
They didn’t have to. Republicans controlled the senate and he would not have been confirmed.

Ffs, this isn’t complicated. Our system worked exactly as it was designed to whether you like it or not.
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28994 posts
Posted on 10/8/20 at 10:05 pm to
quote:

Did the Republicans put Garland to a vote after the election? I must have missed it.


He didn’t have the votes. President nominates, senate advises and consents. They didn’t consent.

I do think they should have had hearings and had a straight up and down vote. He wouldn’t have gotten in. I don’t care for Mitch’s actions there but they were perfectly normal over the course of history.
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
19384 posts
Posted on 10/8/20 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

It's a stupid question (an "ooh, I got you" type) because the answer doesn't really matter

Isn't that true of almost every single issue? The President doesn't rule by decree so who cares what their stance is on any issue since nothing they say matters. I've seen a lot of bad takes on this board but this has to be one of the worst.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram