- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/4/18 at 11:32 am to UnclassyStudent
You still have said less than anything cogent on the point at hand.
Refute of bloviate
Refute of bloviate
Posted on 2/4/18 at 11:34 am to Strannix
You just need the numbers in the Senate to work to impeach is the game plan. Trump has enough anti-Trumps in the Republican Party to potentially make it happen.
Posted on 2/4/18 at 11:39 am to JuiceTerry
quote:
Nixon and Clinton were both charged with obstruction
Not in the most common aspect or definition of being “charged”. They were never charged in a court of law.
Nixon was only officially accused/charged by the House Judiciary Committee 27-11. Before whole House voted he resign and matters were allowed to rest.
Clinton was accused/charged by the whole House 221-212 and an article of impeachment was presented to the Senate.
quote:
Dershowitz paints a pretty specific scenario
Exactly. Specifically Mueller cannot charge (legally) only accuse (politically). Even the House can only politically not legally charge POTUS with articles of impeachment.
quote:
You're not smart enough to think for yourself
The vast majority of Americans are. But many have been mislead by DNC/MSM Political Complex into ignorantly believing that Mueller will enter a Federal Court and charge Trump.
Posted on 2/4/18 at 11:45 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
This is what your kind has been reduced to: spurious legal arguments about future potential offenses.
are you stupid? the SP is investigating Trump's admin for obstruction of justice right now, what do think would be the results if Trump tried to have the SP fired. hence the word 'potential'
quote:
This is what your kind has been reduced to
frick, you are stupid. answered my own question.
Posted on 2/4/18 at 11:47 am to Cruiserhog
quote:
no he knows what he doing, hes on Fox. he is not going to argue the point because he has a producer in his ear. when he is on Cnn they argue the corrupt intent written into the obstruction of justice statute because its an important concept in light of Trump's potential actions towards the SP
Do you even know who Alan Dershowitz is??
Geesh.
Posted on 2/4/18 at 11:48 am to Cruiserhog
Posted on 2/4/18 at 11:49 am to Cruiserhog
quote:
are you stupid? the SP is investigating Trump's admin for obstruction of justice right now, what do think would be the results if Trump tried to have the SP fired. hence the word 'potential'
You’re having a mental breakdown
The filth is trying to perpetuate a scenario in which Trump can be investigated forever under the guise of “well if he does anything about it he’s guilty”
Posted on 2/4/18 at 11:50 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
The optics of it are pretty bad, though.
quote:
True from a Constitutional aspect.
Which is supposed to be all that matters.
quote:
The optics of it are pretty bad, though.
The optics are created by the media, so the optics are biased and will always be bad for a republican,
Posted on 2/4/18 at 12:33 pm to KingSlayer
quote:
Yeah, the Harvard law professor doesn't know what he's talking about. We should listen to Cruiserhog because he has a long history of intelligent and stable post.
Bingo..and guys on this board will argue against, not only the comment, but the comment follows up with inatancestfacts where his position is supported...yet morons like Cruizerpig googled and think they know different
Posted on 2/4/18 at 4:26 pm to JuiceTerry
Clinton was impeached for lying under oath. Something Scooter Libby, and everyone else who lies under oath, goes to jail for.
Nixon refused to turn over White House tapes that were under subpoena and related to the break in and cover up at Watergate hotel.
Nixon's "obstruction" was refusing a duly authorized subpoena that related directly to that break in.
It was also alleged that Nixon ordered the destruction, like Hilary did, of evidence that investigators wanted.
The only comparison between Nixon and now is a question of abuse of the power of office.
Now the abuses of power is being carried out by the political fan boys and girls that head, but shouldn't, fed agencies.
Nixon refused to turn over White House tapes that were under subpoena and related to the break in and cover up at Watergate hotel.
Nixon's "obstruction" was refusing a duly authorized subpoena that related directly to that break in.
It was also alleged that Nixon ordered the destruction, like Hilary did, of evidence that investigators wanted.
The only comparison between Nixon and now is a question of abuse of the power of office.
Now the abuses of power is being carried out by the political fan boys and girls that head, but shouldn't, fed agencies.
This post was edited on 2/4/18 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 2/4/18 at 4:30 pm to tigress4life
quote:Mike Flynn better lube up, then
Clinton was impeached for lying under oath. Something Scooter Libby, and everyone else who lies under oath, goes to jail for.
Your post is straight whataboutism
Scooter Libby and Hillary Clinton have nothing to do with this conversation
Posted on 2/4/18 at 4:40 pm to Gaspergou202
quote:You're so terribly misinformed
Specifically Mueller cannot charge (legally) only accuse (politically).
Posted on 2/4/18 at 4:52 pm to JuiceTerry
Does a SC have the legal authority to charge in the criminal court someone of a crime?
Posted on 2/4/18 at 4:53 pm to JuiceTerry
Juicetitties the legal scholar 
Posted on 2/4/18 at 4:55 pm to goatmilker
He has the authority to bring charges to the AG
He's not restricted to "accusing (politically)"
He's not restricted to "accusing (politically)"
Posted on 2/4/18 at 4:59 pm to JuiceTerry
So no is the answer.
Posted on 2/4/18 at 5:00 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
JuiceTerry
You really need to bow out of this thread.
Posted on 2/4/18 at 5:03 pm to goatmilker
quote:No is the answer to "Was gaspergooper correct?"
So no is the answer.
I told him as much
Posted on 2/4/18 at 5:14 pm to UnclassyStudent
Just get over it already. You have another 7 years of Trump, that's a long time to cry and complain.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News