- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WSJ--"Trump Loses Arizona--Again"
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:19 am to Vacherie Saint
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:19 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
This is a bullshite cop out. How tf do dems, in good conscious, sit here and bitch about pro Trump bias after everything we have to deal with at every level of government, media, higher education, polling, tech, I could go on and on? When do I get to start ignoring everything that doesnt line up with my politics because of "bias"?
And furthermore, do you really think this cyber forensics firm just fricking made up these potentially illegal votes? You think they dont have the data to back it up? It'll fall on the state AG to investigate, but I dont see anyone out there with a half a brain and enough sack to accuse these guys of just making it all up.
So yes, Cyber Ninjas conducted the audit? Can someone please answer?
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:21 am to hubertcumberdale
Does it matter who did the audit? Who did the election? Don’t you think that bullshite mail in votes were kind of a problem? I bet you don’t bc you still think that absentee voting is the same as mail in voting. Because that’s what the propaganda machine told you to think. And don’t worry, this is just the beginning. No doubt you’ll disappear when it gets interesting.
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:22 am to hubertcumberdale
quote:
Was the entire audit conducted by Cyber Ninjas? Does no one see how that could possibly be biased, considering they are very pro-trump and were the guys behind Pillow Guys 'Cyber Symposium?'
When will you dipshits realize that people aren't going to dismiss what their eyes are seeing? Just because y'all keep spewing the shite that nothing happened doesn't make it true. I realize that's prog-filth 101 but y'all can all get fricked with this shite.
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:23 am to I B Freeman
quote:Assuming validity of the claim (and considering the source I don't), they are saying another set of 9,041 voters show up in the data as having returned multiple ballots, only 30% of whom were Republicans.
Another set of 9,041 voters, 34% Democrats to 30% Republicans, show up in the data as having returned multiple ballots.
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:23 am to hubertcumberdale
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:23 am to hubertcumberdale
quote:
So yes, Cyber Ninjas conducted the audit? Can someone please answer?
Yes cumberpatch they did. Sorry you can't deal with the factual results
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:23 am to I B Freeman
quote:Okay, but there is actual evidence of tampering here, mongoloid
This is what Mr. Trump does, regardless of the facts. Remember in 2016, when he said the results of the Iowa Caucus should be “nullified” based on “the fraud committed by Senator Ted Cruz ”
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:24 am to Cromulent
quote:
And don’t worry, this is just the beginning. No doubt you’ll disappear when it gets interesting.

Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:24 am to hubertcumberdale
the only thing that matters is what the state AG finds in his investigation, and what they do or dont do about it
the rest is irrelevant
if the audit is BS then the investigation will be over quickly, if they uncovered fraud and a conspiracy to commit fraud then it could interesting
the rest is irrelevant
if the audit is BS then the investigation will be over quickly, if they uncovered fraud and a conspiracy to commit fraud then it could interesting
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:24 am to NC_Tigah
Did the CyberNinjas do the audit? I apologize for my stupidity. Or was it just released by them from another company?
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:25 am to hubertcumberdale
quote:
So yes, Cyber Ninjas conducted the audit? Can someone please answer?
Since Cyber Ninjas name is all over the paperwork, yes Cyber Ninjas did the audit. Why does that matter? Who should do an audit, and who would you believe? Mr. Soros himself??
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:25 am to hubertcumberdale
Who do you think would be doing the audit? Perkins Coie? The Clinton Foundation? Media Matters? BLM?
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:27 am to I B Freeman
quote:
Yes and even they did not find Trump won.
it is/was their job to locate any potential fraud. not count. climb off of this horse please.
and for the record, the Executive Summary (whish has been copied on here multiple times) says that the results of the 2020 election should not have been verified.
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:28 am to I B Freeman
quote:
WSJ--"Trump Loses Arizona--Again"
It's amazing how poorly the MSM is interpreting these audit results. They clearly showed Trump won.
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:29 am to supatigah
This is exactly correct. The only sections I see that even Cyber Ninja recommends AG is action are sections 5.3 and 5.4.
There are not enough votes there to change the outcome.
There are not enough votes there to change the outcome.
This post was edited on 9/27/21 at 10:37 am
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:29 am to hubertcumberdale
quote:
All i did was ask who did the audit and questioned their bias based on their past client engagements for fricks sake
Did you question the Biden mouth breathers working the polls and counting the votes?
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:30 am to I B Freeman
quote:
I B Freeman
Typical ib fail of a thread.
Fell for fake news and too stupid to realize it.
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:32 am to hubertcumberdale
Wouldn’t expect a different response from a sheep.
Posted on 9/27/21 at 10:32 am to Screaming Viking
I thought part of their goal was to prove the Dominion machines miscounted the votes. They proved the opposite.
But all this report has done is identify issues for the AG and legislature to investigate. No fraud was "proven". Just questions raised and votes identified in the report as "potentially illegal."
Still a lot of work to do for either side to declare victory.
One section the Trumsters are overlooking, though, is the one on Duplicate votes. All this weeping and wailing over duplicate votes, and the report clearly says:
But all this report has done is identify issues for the AG and legislature to investigate. No fraud was "proven". Just questions raised and votes identified in the report as "potentially illegal."
Still a lot of work to do for either side to declare victory.
One section the Trumsters are overlooking, though, is the one on Duplicate votes. All this weeping and wailing over duplicate votes, and the report clearly says:
quote:
These extra votes favored Republican candidates over Democratic candidates... .
This post was edited on 9/27/21 at 10:37 am
Popular
Back to top



6









