- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: World economic rankings.
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:35 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:35 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Every one of those variables is in flux.
Correct.
And are limited by innovation, skills and stability.
If you had ever taken an actual college econ course, you would actually understand what youre talking about.
Google "production function" and learn.
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yeah our economy is awesome. See my chart. We're in a tier of our own which makes our growth the past 10 years (given the mathematical disadvantages of our #1 ranking) so impressive.
Meaningless sentences
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
As I'm explaining to you multiple times this is the best way to show the status of the overall economy. Total production alone does not tell the story well and per capita alone does not tell the story well. The mesh of these two, however, is much more illuminating and describing the tier and status of the economies being analyzed
No. You are using flawed data to reach an outcome. By that very nature, the out come is flawed.
quote:
Yes and by being an economy based on petro exports, there is a natural ceiling which prohibits this non-advanced economy from growing is total GDP to be in the discussion.
Wrong. They could expand in many ways due to advances in many fields.
You are truly missing all the points in everything.
It goes back to what other posters have stated, you are not looking at the whole picture.
quote:
Just as China, who has a bigger potential total GDP, is not in the discussion with America because it's per capita is so bad. That's the whole reason you look at both of them together to get an idea of where the economy is rank in terms of tier and class. Then you compare those economies and how they are developing in terms of percentage of GDP growth to compare like economies to like.
LOL! Horse shite. You still are not grasping the fact that per capita is flawed. You just admitted that Qatar is not an accurate picture.
Yet, with China, you want it to be accurate.
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:These are people that would try to build a skyscraper by themselves. No workers. Because if you hired help, you’d just make them richer. So they’ll try to build a skyscraper by themselves. With hand tools.
Yeah. Nobody said that trade wouldn't benefit both parties to the transaction.
The question is why this is shocking to people like you.
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:45 am to BCreed1
quote:
Upper Middle Class
quote:uMC isn’t US definition of “upper middle class” Hell most americans consider top 5% in the US to be “upper middle class”.
World Bank
This post was edited on 4/5/25 at 11:46 am
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:47 am to Bunk Moreland
The OP’s chart illustrates exactly why the tariffs will work. The rest of the world needs the US, not the other way around.
What a horrible take by the OP….
What a horrible take by the OP….
This post was edited on 4/5/25 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:48 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
If you had ever taken an actual college econ course
quote:... until they aren't, in a relative sense, as paradigms shift
And are limited by innovation, skills and stability.
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:50 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Ater days of arguing that the US importing goods is reason china has become wealthy, and we are in “decline” (which we aren’t)… he now thing relative wealth is t important.
Folks, this is MAGA economics for you.
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yeah our economy is awesome. See my chart. We're in a tier of our own which makes our growth the past 10 years (given the mathematical disadvantages of our #1 ranking) so impressive.
The whole point of your argument is to say tariffs are bad.
You have nothing to base that on. And you keep proving that. This whole thread is proof of it.
You can talk all day about how great we have it, but that does not, has never, and will never prove that we would not have reached this level with tariffs. It's all based on your opinion.
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:51 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
until they aren't, in a relative sense, as paradigms shift
Jesus christ, what magazine did you buy your nursing degree from?
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:52 am to davyjones
quote:Ypu always know you’re winning they start attacking the person, not the position.
Roger, you’re so unlikeable
This is like the good ol’ days around here. Vegas Bengal, Rex, and BamaATL would be so proud!
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:53 am to trader_tiger83
quote:
The US dollar has strengthened against major currencies for over a decade.
quote:You seem very unlikable.
trader_tiger63
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:54 am to BCreed1
quote:
You are using flawed data to reach an outcome. By that very nature, the out come is flawed.
You've yet to explain why you think it's flawed.
quote:
Wrong. They could expand in many ways due to advances in many fields.
They could, but they still have a hard cap, for many reasons.
quote:
It goes back to what other posters have stated, you are not looking at the whole picture.
The ignorance and irony of this statement
I made you a chart to show you a more full picture.
quote:
LOL! Horse shite. You still are not grasping the fact that per capita is flawed.
I"m not only looking at per capita. This has been explained to you 4-5 times now, but you still come back to the same silliness.
The "2023 Index" uses the rankings for total GDP AND per capita GDP, to give a whole picture of the class of economies being analyzed.
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:54 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
Ater days of arguing that the US importing goods is reason china has become wealthy, and we are in “decline” (which we aren’t)… he now thing relative wealth is t important. It’s entertaining as is fascinating.
Its a case of mass psychosis. Its as bad or worse than when Obama was worshipped by the Dems.
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:55 am to Jjdoc
quote:
The whole point of your argument is to say tariffs are bad.
They're suboptimal, to be more accurate of my stance.
quote:
You have nothing to base that on.
We have lots of data and work from actual academics.
quote:
This whole thread is proof of it.
It is, in fact, not.
quote:
You can talk all day about how great we have it, but that does not, has never, and will never prove that we would not have reached this level with tariffs.
Why are you ignoring that we're doing so much better than these countries who rely on the tariffs you want to implement?
We see what happens when countries choose the suboptimal path, and it's worse economic growth by economic tier.
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You've yet to explain why you think it's flawed.
He did. It's right there.
quote:
I"m not only looking at per capita. This has been explained to you 4-5 times now, but you still come back to the same silliness.
The "2023 Index" uses the rankings for total GDP AND per capita GDP, to give a whole picture of the class of economies being analyzed.
He's answered that.
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:59 am to SlidellCajun
quote:Look up the world “asymptote” sometime. And realize percentages are 1/x.
It won’t be long before we fall behind
Posted on 4/5/25 at 11:59 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:I appreciate the respect, but "NC" is fine.
Jesus christ
What part of the post confused you, Rog?
Posted on 4/5/25 at 12:00 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
He did. It's right there
He did not. He's not focusing on the mesh of the 2 concepts and only focusing on one at a time.
Here, I'll help you:
quote:
He's answered that.
He has not. He's only responded specifically to GDP OR PCGDP, and not a mesh of the 2.
Popular
Back to top


2







