re: World economic rankings.

quote:

---

He did. He used Qatar as the example

---

For PCGDP only.

I"m not only using PCGDP

quote:

---

He even quoted all the ways that it is flawed.

---

He quoted the ways using PCGDP alone was flawed, yes. I'm not doing that, though.

quote:

---

No he told you one of those metrics is flawed.

---

When you use it i isolation. I cured the defects.

Here is his AI-based answer

quote:

---

Per Capita Metrics:

Ignores Distribution of Wealth/Resources:
A high per capita income or GDP can mask significant disparities within a population, where a few wealthy individuals skew the average

Doesn't Reflect Quality of Life:
Per capita measures often focus on economic output (like GDP or income) but don't account for factors like access to healthcare, education, leisure time, environmental quality, or social well-being.

Can be Distorted by Population Size:
Small populations can have a disproportionate impact on per capita figures

Doesn't account for differences in purchasing power across countries
Cross-country comparisons based on per capita GDP in USD can be distorted by exchange rate fluctuations and often don't reflect the purchasing power in the countries being compared.

---

I fixed the relevant problems (primarily the low population and mono-resource export issues) by meshing this with total GDP. The rest is liberal bullshite like access to healthcare and environmental quality (which nobody is using in this discussion).

I'll ask again:

Why do you have a problem using a metric that relies on GDP and PCDGP meshed in order to show relative economic status?

Here is your chance to argue I'm using flawed metrics, in your own words.

quote:

---

And China is coming to an end, due to their one child policies and regulatory enviroment.

And thats who you want to emulate...

---

As many red herrings as you deliver, you should open a fish packing plant.

We have a massive budget deficit. The core issue is revenue and deficit mitigation. Everything else is gravy ... or, in the case of some of you, derangement.

Again you miss it.

Pcgdp is flawed

When you add it to any other metric to reach a conclusion, the conclusion will be flawed.

quote:

---

And thats who you want to emulate...
As many red herrings as you deliver

---

Are they kicking our arse?

Do you really believe these rubes?

quote:

---

Pcgdp is flawed

---

I'm not only using PCGDP

Why do you have a problem using a metric that relies on GDP and PCDGP meshed in order to show relative economic status?

quote:

---

When you add it to any other metric to reach a conclusion, the conclusion will be flawed.

---

This is legit retarded

I specifically addressed the flaws in using PCGDP exclusively

quote:

---

Pcgdp is flawed

---

You should be a “climate scientist”.

quote:

---

Are they kicking our arse?

---

It is a completely, totally, thoroughly irrelevant question.

The question is how best to develop revenue sources.

The fact tariffs may concomitantly increase domestic production adds to that equation.

The fact that other countries or foreign corps might absorb some or all of the cost should leave folks happy as clams.

quote:

---

Im not sure how that rehabilitates the example I cited. I’ve seen you throw a few insults his way too.

---

As feeble an attempt as it was, you don’t consider that as Roger attacking NC?

quote:

---

You still cant understand the basics of macroeconomics.

---

Repeat a lie often enough….you self-declare victory like Rex used to. You are no Rex.

quote:

---

This is legit retarded

I specifically addressed the flaws in using PCGDP exclusively

---

No it isn't.


I use a metric that shows 4 + 6= 8. I use that to add this metric.. 10+2= 12.

So the outcome would be 8+12= 20. Which is false because 4+6= 10 not 8.