Started By
Message

re: Women in Combat: What say you?

Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:37 pm to
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28121 posts
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:37 pm to
quote:

Standards for Ranger school aren’t different. Standards for the SF Q course aren’t different standards for Marine infantry officer school aren’t different. This is the point I’m making.


You have no fricking idea what you're talking about.
Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
20197 posts
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

I challenge anyone to provide evidence where standards have been dropped or reduced in combat arms billets based on sex.


Dude, you are a damn moron if you think the standards haven’t changed. When I went through IOC you had to run the trail fyou saw in the beginning of Silence of the Lambs for a time. However, it was with 60 lbs of gear and an M16. Included in that run was the Marine Corps obstacle course. You didn’t have to run it once but twice back to back with that 60 lbs of gear. Sorry but there is no damn way a female could accomplish that task. I would say also I can not see a female completely a 25 mile hump with a combat load and crew served weapons. I also can’t imagine a woman being about to go longer than a month in the field with no shower and only MREs like I did in Turkey. I don’t have any friends in still that supervise training but it only takes a slight bit of common sense to see that the standards have changed like they did for the Rangers Course.
Posted by LRB1967
Tennessee
Member since Dec 2020
23171 posts
Posted on 1/16/25 at 11:35 pm to
I don't think so
Posted by TigerChick2018
Mobile, AL
Member since Jun 2018
393 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 3:37 am to
Unless the enemy is going to lower their war tactic standards to accommodate the women who are on the front line due to lowered military standards then the answer is a "Hell No".

I have been against this since it first began. I shudder to think of all the men and women, and warriors, injured, maimed, or killed because of unqualified women not up to the challenge and demands of being in a war zone.
Posted by TigerChick2018
Mobile, AL
Member since Jun 2018
393 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 3:46 am to
quote:

Military physical standards for men and women differ because their bodies are intrinsically designed differently. The different standards are designed to create a level playing field for qualification

There is no level playing field in a war zone and war is no game.
Posted by TigerChick2018
Mobile, AL
Member since Jun 2018
393 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 3:52 am to
Nope. As with other political hot buttons, "their body" has a direct impact on the lives, safety, and well-being of others.
Posted by TigerChick2018
Mobile, AL
Member since Jun 2018
393 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 3:54 am to
quote:

Congratulations, you support the current military because this is what’s happening.

I challenge anyone to provide evidence where standards have been dropped or reduced in combat arms billets based on sex.


Here you go, sparky. Now what?

LINK
Posted by Whodat4300
Tennessee
Member since Jul 2020
1269 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 3:57 am to
I served with one or two that I wouldn’t have minded sharing a foxhole with. Most of em, nope.
Posted by Rashcock
Lowcountry
Member since Sep 2024
305 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 4:07 am to
quote:

Now what?


Now the little pusswah will go into hiding. That's what. The unfit for combat women would probably run circles around his fat arse, but that is about the lowest bar any organism ever had to hurdle.
Posted by Mandtgr47
Member since Aug 2024
7918 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 5:25 am to
quote:

They don't belong in combat. Hell, they shouldn't even be voting


As a veteran, I 100% agree on them not being in combat.

As a conservative human being, I 100% agree that they should not be allowed to vote. Too many "feelings" involved in their votes, vs weighing the actual policies and impacts on our country.

I also believe they should not be President/Leaders in large institutions.

Yes, there are exceptions, and for those women my apologies and appreciation...but as a whole, I think it is clear that they should not be voting, unless your political beliefs align with the radical left.
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8933 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 7:06 am to
quote:

The trope is standards to assess to combat arms have been reduced or altered.


So you are saying women who want to be in combat arms have to meet a lower standard than men, it’s just the same lower standard they meet in the rest of the military?

You don’t have to go to ranger school to be infantry, artillery or armor. In fact the vast majority don’t.
Posted by monsterballads
Gulf of America
Member since Jun 2013
31513 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 7:10 am to
quote:

I challenge anyone to provide evidence where standards have been dropped or reduced in combat arms billets based on sex.



it's already happening.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299097 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 7:10 am to
quote:

As a conservative human being, I 100% agree that they should not be allowed to vote.



I have a better idea, maybe men should stop being simps and propping up average chicks while empowering them.

They act insane because simps reward them for it.
Posted by BayouBaw84
Member since Oct 2016
3317 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 7:13 am to
What the MOS number for sandwich maker?
Posted by mcpotiger
Missouri
Member since Mar 2005
9079 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 7:13 am to
Nope..
Posted by monsterballads
Gulf of America
Member since Jun 2013
31513 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 7:29 am to
quote:

Men and women use the same scoring standards in the Army infantry for fitness tests?


no. they are different based on if you identify as a man or woman
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299097 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 7:35 am to
quote:

You don’t have to go to ranger school to be infantry, artillery or armor. In fact the vast majority don’t.


I imagine women could do OK with artillery, drones, etc...

I think the military is actively recruiting nerds for the higher tech stuff.
Posted by Philzilla
Member since Nov 2011
2214 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 7:45 am to
There has to be standards.
Posted by RockoRou
SW Miss
Member since Mar 2015
935 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 8:09 am to
I heard women are crack shots. If they get a crack in the door, they'll be in. Not to good with vehicles though, too many crack ups. No more cracks about women in the military, this shite cracks me up.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
63403 posts
Posted on 1/17/25 at 8:40 am to
I used to see them fail all the time during basic on-shore damage control exercises, particularly dealing with the various types of shoring.
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram