- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/27/24 at 4:50 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
we have their written correspondence
Which correspondence is that? The only texts entered were recanted on the stand today, so don't hold weight.
quote:
GIS phone data
Doesn't show the existence of a relationship, just that a phone/person was in a general area at a general time.
quote:
a documented relationship
They've never denied it. But there is no documentation that it started before Wade was hired, which makes it fine re: disqualification purposes.
quote:
raising all sorts of ethical issues regardless of dates.
Ethical issues, sure. Disqualification issues, not so much.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 4:51 pm to BamaAtl
I don't recall!
Here are your texts.
I don't recall!
Lol
You are truly a sperm burping gutter slut.
Here are your texts.
I don't recall!
Lol
You are truly a sperm burping gutter slut.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 4:53 pm to Godfather1
Am I the only one who got the impression that dumb mother fricker wasn't even intelligent enough to comprehend the questions he was asked by Sadow? The dude seems legitimately stupid. How the hell did he become a lawyer?
Posted on 2/27/24 at 4:53 pm to Jbird
quote:
You are truly a sperm burping gutter slut.
Nah...like all Democrats, hesheit has gone full Nazi.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 5:01 pm to Jbird
quote:
I don't recall!
Here are your texts.
I don't recall!
Dude got caught lying and talking shite, then admitted it on the stand.
Not great news for team Trump when you're trying to rely on his testimony to make your weak case.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 5:03 pm to BamaAtl
The defense from the state caused that idiot.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 5:04 pm to Jbird
quote:
The defense from the state
The state isn't the defense, it's the state.
The defense is the defense - and they're the ones who have no sworn testimony to refute what Wade and Willis testified to.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 5:13 pm to BamaAtl
This is what will probably happen too, although I expect the judge to remove them from the case based on the appearance of impropriety.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 5:18 pm to Jbird
quote:
Here are your texts.
I don't recall!
Lol
You are truly a sperm burping gutter slut.
You realize team trump said the same thing about tons of stuff right
Posted on 2/27/24 at 5:20 pm to KCSilverTiger
quote:
Am I the only one who got the impression that dumb mother fricker wasn't even intelligent enough to comprehend the questions he was asked by Sadow? The dude seems legitimately stupid. How the hell did he become a lawyer?
I don't know him obviously, but he had a lot of things hanging over his head on every answer so he had to be very careful (perjury with possible sanctions or disbarment, possible SA lawsuit/criminal complaint, and whatever Willis, Wade, and the deep state are capable of/willing to do).
At that point, you must be very careful you fully understand the question, think about any potential traps/lies you can be caught up in, etc. Asking the defense to restate their question is a stall tactic to frame your answer and/or be less than fully truthful.
I don't understand why this guy was prepared to fully cooperate, then suddenly turtle up. Someone got to him clearly.
This post was edited on 2/27/24 at 5:22 pm
Posted on 2/27/24 at 5:26 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
She admitted on cross that she had no personal knowledge of it.
I dare you to show me where in the testimony she said she had no personal knowledge. Double dog dare you. It literally never happened. She saw with her eyes and heard with her ears.
I'll even link it for you. I'll wait.
LINK
This post was edited on 2/27/24 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 2/27/24 at 5:26 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
You realize team trump said the same thing about tons of stuff right
He took notes when Bill and Hillary Cnton were under oath....and Obama.....
Posted on 2/27/24 at 5:48 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
I don't know him obviously, but he had a lot of things hanging over his head on every answer so he had to be very careful (perjury with possible sanctions or disbarment, possible SA lawsuit/criminal complaint, and whatever Willis, Wade, and the deep state are capable of/willing to do).
I mean you could just tell the truth and not have to worry about perjury. The dude legitimately looked confused and lost when asked questions by Sadow.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 5:58 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
general time.
Lololol
POS always.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 6:06 pm to LSUGent
quote:
The judge is the one evaluating the credibility about all of this testimony…
The judge sure seemed to be a little heavy handed in interfering with the defense questioning and strategy. He was allowing Wade attorneys to narrate responses for the witness and worse was he kept forcing the defense to pre expose her questions and why she was asking the questions.
He had a hostile witness who was avoiding answers, but yet the judge was more hostile to the defense attorney. He should have given her more room leniency to get her questions asked since the witness was being overly vague and contradicting his previous statements.
Posted on 2/27/24 at 6:27 pm to fwtex
quote:
Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_
BREAKING: Key witness Terrence Bradley testified he received call from Nathan Wade's current law partner Gabe Banks that he interpreted as a threat to keep silent about Wade's pre-2021 affair with D.A. Fani Willis. Turns out Banks' wife Kyra Banks serves as Willis' chief of staff
6:11 PM · Feb 27, 2024
Posted on 2/27/24 at 6:29 pm to fwtex
This is the kill shot. If Bradley took more than 1 second (seriously) to answer this question, he and all those in his orbit are screwed. He took at least 30 seconds.
"Did you lie to Ms. Merchant when you told her facts about Mr. Wade and Ms. Willis' relationship?"
"Did you lie to Ms. Merchant when you told her facts about Mr. Wade and Ms. Willis' relationship?"
Posted on 2/27/24 at 6:29 pm to NC_Tigah
How can anyone possibly believe a case brought forth by these two? How can they ask the courts to believe they are bringing a case in good faith?
I have no faith in ”the system” after NY case, but their contempt and dishonesty is on full display here.
Biden has a plant in Fani’s office. Jack? DeSantis I believe is his name. Serves as a liaison to the White House. I home this team doesn’t quit and keeps going up the food chain
I have no faith in ”the system” after NY case, but their contempt and dishonesty is on full display here.
Biden has a plant in Fani’s office. Jack? DeSantis I believe is his name. Serves as a liaison to the White House. I home this team doesn’t quit and keeps going up the food chain
Posted on 2/27/24 at 6:31 pm to fwtex
It became obvious early on that he was going to stick to his plan to obfuscate his responses to questions about his understanding of anything all of his texts and stick to “I can’t recall” whenever he could.
After it became apparent that he was going that direction the judge let them land enough to prove the point and then moved on knowing this guy was worthless as far as providing a compelling rebuttal.
All that matters now is what happens with the geolocation cell data and if it is admitted does Wade and Willis decide to be willing to go back in under oath to refute the cell data….
After it became apparent that he was going that direction the judge let them land enough to prove the point and then moved on knowing this guy was worthless as far as providing a compelling rebuttal.
All that matters now is what happens with the geolocation cell data and if it is admitted does Wade and Willis decide to be willing to go back in under oath to refute the cell data….
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News