Started By
Message

re: Will Tucker have the balls to ask Putin tough questions?

Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:44 pm to
Posted by heymama
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2022
275 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:44 pm to
And you sit when you shite. I hope?
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40175 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

Do us a favor and stay there if you care so much about their border. Our money should be spent on our border.


Did you not see my post the other day that if the Senate and the Biden administration want money for Ukraine they should pass HR2 which the HOR passed last year?
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40175 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

I’ve been to both Russia and Ukraine as well. I have friends and relatives in both countries that I communicate with regularly. You are woefully uninformed.


Please explain how I am uninformed.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80313 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:53 pm to
The word itself is more benign. In reality, there’s probably a lot of overlap between the people I’m talking about and the people Clinton was referencing.
This post was edited on 2/7/24 at 10:10 pm
Posted by Demonbengal
Ruston
Member since May 2015
1337 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:56 pm to
Why all the shirtless pics Vlad?
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40175 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

Despite these odds and often being a much smaller force (at the beginning have 1/3 less forces)


Russia invaded Ukraine with approximately 200,000 troops. The Ukrainian armed forces prior to the invasion consisted of 220,000 personnel total. Which brings up another good question to ask Putin. Why should the Russian people continue to trust you when you mistakenly invaded a country of almost 40 million with only 200,000 troops?

quote:

Russia has been the one slowly winning the war.


The Russians have lost 53% of the total territory that they controlled at the high water mark. The Russians are losing hundreds of soldiers every day to advance < 1km per day or some days do not advance at all around Avdiika? That doesn’t sound like winning to me.
This post was edited on 2/7/24 at 10:05 pm
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45328 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:07 pm to
So you and Hillary are essentially talking about the same people in this largely benign world.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80313 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:11 pm to
Typo. Should have been word not world.

But yes, a lot of the folks who are drawn to Trump are drawn to him because they’re upset with the status quo and see him as an agent to change it.

Is that controversial to you?
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
15340 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

Why should the Russian people continue to trust you when you mistakenly invaded a country of almost 40 million with only 200,000 troops?


Despite being a large Nato army, the Ukranian-Nato forces werent proven as an army yet. I guess Putin felt they would scatter and not fight when the bullets and bombs started flying. But the Ukranian-Nato army was super well trained, super well equipped, super coordinated and had great defenses ready and analysts. They were already a Nato army. The US would never allow China to turn Mexico into an army on its border. Hell we almost went to war over Cuba.

Which brings up a better question, how extremely stupid were the people in the US that said this was a Russian army trying to invade western Europe when it was such a small force. And with all the lies western media has told about this war, there are still stupid people who regurgitate their blatantly lying talking points.

quote:

The Russians are losing hundreds of soldiers every day to advance < 1km per day or some days do not advance at all around Avdiika?


Russia pulled back because they were overstretched at the beginning. The pull back was smart and allowed them time to bring a lot more numbers into the war since they were behind in this. Also allowed them to transition to building a lot more equipment for a much longer war when they didnt get the immediate knock out punch. They were going to need a stronger war time economy to defeat all of NATO war funding and an entire nation conscripted into being soldiers.

There has been a strong momentum swing as Ukraine has begun to run out of a lot of western munitions, skilled fighters, and their ruling class begins intra fighting for control. The complete failure of the spring/summer/fall ukranian offensive has transitioned into the slowing grinding success of the Russian offensive that is seeing the Ukranian strong fortress of Avdiivka crumble before our eyes.
This post was edited on 2/7/24 at 10:26 pm
Posted by IsraelJones
Member since Dec 2023
132 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:25 pm to
If any CNN or MSNBC “journalist” could ask Putin one question it would be “why are you mean to LGBTQP people”? That’s who they are.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
57728 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

Of course this board would love to kiss Putin’s arse too.


There's a large canyon between being a Putin fan and treating the actor Zelensky like a biblical prophet and holding onto his every word, but of course you know that
Posted by Bow08tie
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2011
4225 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:39 pm to
Clarification - Putin side of the story wasn’t being told
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
22411 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

When you can liquidate a country of millions of people and turn them into an army completely backed by nearly endless military training, weapons, and military analysts from a whole coalition of many wealthy western countries.


But I thought all of that aid was stolen and the weapons were sold?

Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
15340 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:54 pm to
quote:

But I thought all of that aid was stolen and the weapons were sold?



I'm unaware of how much of the billions were stolen. Apparently enough for the west to finally admit it and sack Ukranians over. How much do you think was stolen?
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
22411 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:57 pm to
I don't know but we have been told on here for months that all of it was stolen or going back in kickbacks and all of the equipment was sold on the black market.
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
15340 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

all of it was stolen


I doubt anyone has said all of it was stolen. Sounds more like you don't like the fact that someone pointed out that a good bit had been stolen and tried to create a strawman out of your own hyperbole to create a weak attempt at a gotcha instead of discussing how much was stolen.
Posted by Semper Gumby
Member since Dec 2021
289 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 11:12 pm to
quote:

ask Putin why he supports Assad

Assad was looking for any support from being overthrown by Isis like Hosni Mubarak in Egypt was overthrown by the Muslim Brotherhood. Both Assad and Mubarak were as close to being neutral towards the West in a Muslim country as one could be before Obama fricked them over. Assad needed a strong ally, and Russia was available while Obama was trying to help topple his government. Russia, like the US, offers military aid in order to gain influence with other nations.

It amazes me how willing people are to get spoon fed propaganda.
This post was edited on 2/7/24 at 11:20 pm
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
22411 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 11:13 pm to
But I was wondering: If Ukraine was equipped to the point of being a NATO army like you say and it was all stolen or sold like so many on here have said, how come it has taken Russia two years and they still only control 18% of the territory? Something just doesn't add up. Either Ukraine has actually used that equipment/aid and it wasn't all stolen or so!d or Russia must have the shittiest army on Earth.
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
15340 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

it was all stolen


Again you try to double down and turn some stolen into all stolen. See former response because you have failed to move forward from previous.
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
22411 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 11:27 pm to
I am pretty sure that they were saying most of it was being stolen or sold. So I get it now. The ones on here that have been saying for months that all or a large portion of the aid was stolen and the military equipment was sold on the black market are full of shite otherwise the great Russian Army would have taken Kiev in 3 days.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram