- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will Texas Children’s Hospital kill this child as retribution for Paxton blocking them?
Posted on 6/8/26 at 7:54 am to AlwysATgr
Posted on 6/8/26 at 7:54 am to AlwysATgr
quote:Alright, first let's agree a couple of major foundational points.
The point AlwysATgr is making is that TCH issued a statement in early '22 that it would no longer perform transgender medical procedures on children. Yet, they did. They were all in on the transgender craze.
(1) Dr. Eithan Haim is an absolute medical hero.. His revelations as to what was ongoing in TCH surgery are foundational to the Hippocratic Oath, and he undertook those at great risk. He remains involved btw (see the yt embedded below)
(2) TCH was "all in on the transgender craze." Sad truth. About a year before Paxton's child abuse edict, TCH brought in Dr. Catherine Gordon to head the Dept of Peds there. Gordon is a Pediatric Transgender zealot and a medical ghoul. That choice indicates significant medical and administrative problems in place there at the time.
----
My responses here (which have elicited some very emotional and poorly considered reactions) target statements ranging from incorrect misunderstandings to demonstrably false stupidity.
E.g., I'll address a technical misstatement in your post: "TCH issued a statement in early '22 that it would no longer perform transgender medical procedures on children."
In March 2022, respondent to the Paxton-Abbott child abuse proclamation, Texas Children’s Hospital said it had paused "hormone-related prescription therapies for gender-affirming care for minors" in order to "protect staff and families from possible legal risk." The TCH announcement did not commit to a permanent ban, nor did it address the surgical procedures forming the crux of Haim's complaint a year later.
TCH's March 2022 decisions also resulted in Catherine Gordon's abrupt resignation (She's now at the NIH
). Additionally, at least four or five more 'doctors' quit/resigned/got dismissed with Haim's revelations. quote:There were changes in both BTW.
Yes, "clean house" implies interrelationships. You're thinking horizontal relationships; I'm thinking vertical.
Dr. Haim addressing Congress
0
Posted on 6/8/26 at 8:52 am to udtiger
quote:
Paxton should announce anyone that does anything to that child will be arrested
This kind of shite sends me over the edge with over zealous admin types. Just get trump to fly in a military trauma unit, with armed MPs, and dare a mother fricker to try and stop them.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 9:19 am to NC_Tigah
quote:I wonder did this hospital screw up this child's care and they know it. Releasing or transferring to another hospital might bring that screw up to light.
NO!
It was NEVER a question as to if this was why they are not releasing the child to another hospital.
Refusing to allow a transfer seems odd.
They don't need parent's permission to do a simple apnea test. I suspect there is way more at play that we see.
PS - I can't believe the OP thinks the hospital makes that kind of money from harvesting that child's organs. If that were the case, no one would ever be discharged from a hospital absent a toe tag.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 9:43 am to Diamondawg
quote:Doubtful, based on the on scene resuscitation story.
I wonder did this hospital screw up this child's care
My suspicion is (and let me be clear given the animus that this thread has generated, this is just a guess) that when it became obvious the poor baby was not responding once swelling resolved, the Medical team addressed ominous neuro status checks and ramifications with the parents. As is often the case in these situations, someone on the team probably mentioned the possibility of organ donation.
The finality of organ donation suggestion often hits families very hard. It is entirely plausible that the parents concluded Texas Children's was no longer doing everything it could to secure the best outcome possible for their baby, and addressed a possible transfer to another facility. The inevitable response in such a circumstance would be, "there are likely no accepting facilities, but we can check."
Whether or not, there actually are two facilities willing to accept transfer of this child to their ICU is anybody's guess. As I've said, the strange thing about the claim is that one would expect the two perspective facilities not to be acting anonymously, but rather to promote their altruism, caring, and open availability. It would simply seem those two facilities would want their names out in the public domain.
Yet, to the best of my knowledge, neither of the two institutional names has been released. I believe there was a statement from a political representative that they "hope Hermann Hospital would consider accepting this patient." That would imply to me Hermann had not yet come to such a conclusion. But again, to be clear, that is all simply conjecture on my part based on my experience in the field.
Page 10 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News