- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wikileaks schools NPR, beats NPR like a rented mule
Posted on 5/7/17 at 7:49 am to Strannix
Posted on 5/7/17 at 7:49 am to Strannix
quote:What do you do for a living? Must not require much in the way of intelligence. That I can tell you.
NavyTiger prolly swabs a lot of decks
Engage with the subject or go redneck somewhere else.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 7:49 am to Navytiger74
quote:
wikileaks' pattern of disclosures tells a simple enough story
True logic in motion.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 7:52 am to Navytiger74
quote:
You' e lost the ability to even hold a conversation
Lol.
Nobody believes the muh Russians narrative anymore. It was proven to be false.
Yet here you are
Posted on 5/7/17 at 7:52 am to CptBengal
quote:Post when they "went after Putin" in any meaningful way. I'd love to see it. And not for nothing, but I did mention that a former employee specifically alleged a pro-Russia bias and hinted at cross-coordination. And to the poster who mentioned that they seek to shed light on abusive governments, I have to ask why Russia has been spared entirely and China has largely been spared. They have their leakers and defectors. Surely there must be something to bring to light.
They went after Putin in 2010.
Are you just ignorant, or are you stupid too?
Posted on 5/7/17 at 7:54 am to Navytiger74
quote:
but I did mention that a former employee specifically alleged a pro-Russia bias and hinted at cross-coordination.
Well then.
One former employee.... you figured it out polly.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 7:55 am to themunch
quote:You guys such hopeless dorks. The pro-Russia hard-on is nothing new around here, but the lengths you go to in ignoring the apparent is something to behold. Again, this is the position of the U.S. and the British governments, backed by their technical collections and anaylitical enterprises.
True logic in motion.
Too far fetched for the ever sceptical Jade Helmers of the poliboard, though.
Joke.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 7:56 am to Navytiger74
quote:
I said it works in coordination with the Kremlin and targets the US and its allies while ignoring entirely the Kremlin and its misdeeds. This is easily verifiable
But, you're totally ok with what Barry and the gang did aren't you?
Posted on 5/7/17 at 7:58 am to LSU2a
quote:Except the 1,600,000,000 common people in China and Russia. Thank God the poor serfs in Western Europe, Australia, and the U.S. have an advocate, though.
The agenda of wikileaks is to expose corruption of the most powerful entities for the sake of the common person.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 8:02 am to Navytiger74
quote:
Again, this is the position of the U.S. and the British governments, backed by their technical collections and anaylitical enterprises.
Would you agree that at least
1) the American government, at the time of their analysis, had something to gain by discrediting Wikileaks?
2) the American government / american IC has a track record of lying to the US people?
3) Wikileaks has never published fake information / published doctored information?
Posted on 5/7/17 at 8:05 am to Navytiger74
quote:
Except the 1,600,000,000 common people in China
LINK It's hilarious how ignorant you are...and still think you have some level of intelligence
Posted on 5/7/17 at 8:09 am to CptBengal
quote:
CptBengal
But he is dictating the discussion to you, just like the media.
Y'all are talking about who the info comes from, instead of the truth of the info itself.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 8:11 am to Stingray
They spent about 30 minutes talking about impeaching trump last Thursday or Friday. Disgusting. Really need to shut it down
Posted on 5/7/17 at 8:12 am to CptBengal
quote:Hard-hitting stuff, Bengal. The last time we had this discussion I mentioned that China's disclosures were minor and that the last real drop was almost 8 years ago. It's why I earlier in his thread said China was largely ignored.
CptBengal
Why don't you focus on substance and stop aimlessly swinging in the dark.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 8:17 am to Navytiger74
Still hung up on muh Russians I see.
And your new avi of the antichrist of France is
antichrist played in the movie about end times "left Behind"
your avi, France's antichrist
just sayin, bad troll avi even for you...
ETA: even though you have posted you think he is handsome, it still sucks as a troll avi; and he lacks the fetching blue eyes.
And your new avi of the antichrist of France is
antichrist played in the movie about end times "left Behind"
your avi, France's antichrist
just sayin, bad troll avi even for you...
ETA: even though you have posted you think he is handsome, it still sucks as a troll avi; and he lacks the fetching blue eyes.
This post was edited on 5/7/17 at 8:20 am
Posted on 5/7/17 at 8:21 am to Navytiger74
quote:Snowden on the heels of Clapper's Congressional testimony, proving Clapper perjured himself, was a gamechanger, NT. It just was. Assange enjoyed the slipstream that created.
You guys such hopeless dorks.
e.g., CNN giving Clinton Debate questions in advance, and Clinton taking them was unforgivable. CNN's lack of coverage of its own gaping breach was atrocious.
After Crowley's 2012 inexplicably coordinated intercession in the POTUS Debate, it actually leaves one wishing Wikileaks had similar access in 2012 to establish just how clean (or filthy) CNN was in that fiasco.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 8:25 am to Navytiger74
quote:
Navytiger74

This post was edited on 5/7/17 at 8:27 am
Posted on 5/7/17 at 8:26 am to Navytiger74
Lol drink kool aid much? You sound just like the msm.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 8:28 am to CptBengal
quote:
It's hilarious how ignorant you are...and still think you have some level of intelligence

Popular
Back to top


1











