- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:19 pm to andouille
quote:
As a black woman her point of view is important and she can bring an insight into decisions that none of the other justices have. That insight deserves to be heard and considered.
None of that should matter for a SCOTUS justice.
Why can’t we just have justices that can, you know, interpret the law?
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:19 pm to andouille
quote:
As a black woman her point of view is important
WRONG.
There is a reason Lady Justice has on a blindfold with law in one hand the scales of justice in the other.
A Supreme Court Justice must be as impartial as possible in arriving at his/her decisions, otherwise we get sideways bullcrap like the decision to let the Obamacare mandate slide (among many, many others).
Being black should not be an excuse to use the Constitution as legal toilet paper.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:20 pm to andouille
quote:Translated and nope.
As a black woman her bias is important and she can bring a bias into decisions that none of the other justices have. That bias deserves to be heard and considered
quote:You're not conservative if you believe The Constitution should be dependent on one's biases.
As a staunch conservative I believe in fairness, this is fair
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:23 pm to andouille
OP been hitting that retard sauce.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:28 pm to andouille
quote:
First off, she qualified
We won't know until her pedo records are released.
quote:
As a black woman her point of view is important
No it isn't.
quote:
That insight deserves to be heard and considered.
She's already made it heard. What does that have to do with appointing her?
quote:
As a staunch conservative I believe in fairness, this is fair.
You believe in watching your wife get bukakke'd by groups of men
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:33 pm to andouille
Title 9 and race Nomination? This should never happen on the Supreme Court of the USA. Our founding fathers are crying over the abuse and misinterpretations of our Constitution.
Another Government Nationwide search?
Another Government Nationwide search?
This post was edited on 3/18/22 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:34 pm to VBFlorida
One of her big platforms is to decrease penalties for child sex offenders - She is pro pedo that’s why they want her in office up there
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:40 pm to andouille
quote:
First off, she qualified, is she the most qualified? I doubt it but that is besides the point. This isn't a position like a quarterback or test pilot, this is a position that each justice brings with them a lifetime of experience from a world much different than mine, and likely yours.
As a black woman her point of view is important and she can bring an insight into decisions that none of the other justices have. That insight deserves to be heard and considered.
As a staunch conservative I believe in fairness, this is fair.
You racist POS. This is exactly what is wrong with our country today. How bout we find the most qualified candidate - not the one with the right skin color or genetalia.
If law were interpreted strictly by the Constitution and not be the "feels" that you think it should, we ALL would be better off.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:41 pm to andouille
quote:
n her point of view i
the only point of view that matters for the USSC is the view of the constitution.
I dont care about her 'background'. i care if she can read the paper that tells her how to do her job.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:59 pm to andouille
quote:
First off, she qualified, is she the most qualified? I doubt it but that is besides the point.
Then why in the f*ck is it called The Supreme Court?
Didn't we try this $hit already with the "wise Latina" woman?
Posted on 3/18/22 at 4:09 pm to Lg
quote:
How does she interpret the LAW?
Just like all the other justices, through the lens of her own experiences.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 4:11 pm to andouille
quote:
As a black woman her point of view is important and she can bring an insight into decisions that none of the other justices have.
Her job as justice/judge has nothing to do with her point of view. It’s to read the law and apply it to cases.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 4:30 pm to andouille
quote:
As a staunch conservative I believe in fairness, this is fair.
bullshite you are.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 4:38 pm to andouille
If you support this nominee then you support discrimination on the basis of race. Biden's qualifications for nominee excluded anyone else that was not a black woman, regardless of other qualifications
Posted on 3/18/22 at 4:46 pm to MMauler
speaking of Harvard ... why don't we have an Asian justice?
I object to this
I object to this
Posted on 3/18/22 at 4:53 pm to andouille
quote:
As a staunch conservative I believe in fairness, this is fair.
I love neat self-defeaters.
Back to top


0








