Started By
Message

re: Why is everyone so upset with the USSC rulings?

Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:10 pm to
Posted by Great Plains Drifter
Flyover, U.S.A.
Member since Jul 2019
10266 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Because they think SCOTUS is a political body that should do whatever the president who nominated them wants them to (and it has historically acted that way sometimes). ETA: To be fair, so does the President. They're mad because Trump is.


Yes, because all Democrat presidents were known for actively seeking out judicial nominees who would rule against Democrat Party initiatives and goals.

And you actually think if DJT came out today with a “no big deal” shrug of the shoulders that most GOP voters would be ok with it too.

Interesting stuff you got going on in that noggin upstairs.
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
16933 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Why is everyone so upset with the USSC rulings?


Everyone is not.

Liberals are rejoicing at the latest rulings and the likely rulings to come.

But keep in mind Liberals hated the courts and wanted to a add seats when RvW was overturned so their liberals agenda could be steam rolled through.

Liberals are masters at stacking the courts with political activists to get what they want. Conservatives are way behind in the game and kind of clumsy in trying to catch up.
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
20784 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

RIPMachoMan

Boy, looks like this thread is going to attract a ton of smug left-wing loons.

I think I'll depart from what is already becoming a garbage thread.




Yep, smart move.

They're already starting.
Posted by JellyRoll
Member since Apr 2024
2124 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

The same reason the Republicans do while they still have power.



I can only hope the senate Republicans kill the filibuster and codify Trump's agenda items and pass the Save America Act. Unfortunately we won't be that lucky.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
14993 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Didn’t Trump nominate 3 of them?


Yeah, back when he had snake in the grass backstabbing Deep State RINOs "advising" him during his first term.

frick you.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
14993 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:13 pm to
quote:


Because they think SCOTUS is a political body that should do whatever the president who nominated them wants them to (and it has historically acted that way sometimes).

ETA: To be fair, so does the President. They're mad because Trump is.


TDS, much? Pussy.
Posted by theliontamer
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2015
2118 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:15 pm to
Clickbait article titles are the only research a lot of people do. But in reality, the SC is majority conservative, and therefore trustworthy.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
14993 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:16 pm to
quote:


If you actually think that, you are severely retarded.


Well, she's definitely not a right-winger. If you believe that you're fricking retarded. JBE was pro-life too but he wasn't anything close to being conservative on any other issue. He was a commie on everything else.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12591 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

TDS, much? Pussy.
No, not a fan of Jackson or Sotamayor at all. I can separate jurisprudence from politics, unlike you or some current SCOTUS appointees.

The only reason Trump is even mad is the Carroll case, which no one else on either side would even care about, and wouldn't have gone this far, if his name weren't on it.

Think about this: The only reason the vast majority of people are paying any attention to the actual SCOTUS rulings is because Trump got mad about them not making a ruling on a totally personal case that otherwise they would have absolutely nothing to do with.
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 1:56 pm
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
91714 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:18 pm to
Somebody drafted Jamarcus Russell so not sure what your point is?
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12591 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Yes, because all Democrat presidents were known for actively seeking out judicial nominees who would rule against Democrat Party initiatives and goals.

And you actually think if DJT came out today with a “no big deal” shrug of the shoulders that most GOP voters would be ok with it too.

Interesting stuff you got going on in that noggin upstairs.
I literally said it has happened historically. FDR invented the idea of "court packing." Do you think I meant it was limited to Republicans?

Yes. I absolutely believe if DJT said, "No big deal, guys, we will still achieve our agenda," (even though the agenda changes daily) his base would 100% eat it up and decide SCOTUS has no real power.
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 1:25 pm
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12591 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

Why do you think the dems talk of killing the filibuster, and packing the SC once they gain power again in the senate and whitehouse?

quote:

I can only hope the senate Republicans kill the filibuster and codify Trump's agenda items and pass the Save America Act. Unfortunately we won't be that lucky.
"If they do it it's evil, so I hope we do it first"
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
12669 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:39 pm to
If you agree with a SCOTUS judge’s vote 100% of the time you have a horrible SCOTUS judge.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12591 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:51 pm to
Agreed
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
26470 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

Roberts joining with the 3 liberal justices and crafting majority rulings


Posted by FLTech
he/won
Member since Sep 2017
28937 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:55 pm to
THEY ARE STILL COUNTING BALLOTS IN CALIFORNIA. HOW LONG AGO WAS THAT FRAUD ELECTION?

It's insane and not what the founders of our country ever wanted for elections
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
26470 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

If you agree with a SCOTUS judge’s vote 100% of the time you have a horrible SCOTUS judge.

After the past few days, I would never have believed I would be upvoting a ronricks post, but here we are.

Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
11380 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Because they think SCOTUS is a political body that should do whatever the president who nominated them wants them to (and it has historically acted that way sometimes).


Oh God damn, a fricking leftist whining about this thought?

The ONLY Justices who are EVER in doubt are Republican appointed ones. Every leftist Justice is a lockstep political a-hole exactly as you describe.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12591 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Oh God damn, a fricking leftist whining about this thought?

The ONLY Justices who are EVER in doubt are Republican appointed ones. Every leftist Justice is a lockstep political a-hole exactly as you describe.
Oh God damn, a fricking "rightist" who replied to the first post and didn't read the rest of the thread...
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 2:03 pm
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
11380 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

If you agree with a SCOTUS judge’s vote 100% of the time you have a horrible SCOTUS judge.


So by definition that is the 3 leftist ones.

haha, you fricking idiot
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram