- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why doesn't Mexico come in for harsher criticism?
Posted on 6/20/18 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 6/20/18 at 4:31 pm
What % of these "asylum seekers" at the US border are coming from south of Mexico? I thought it was a lot of them. If so, why aren't they applying for asylum in Mexico? Why isn't the world demanding that Mexico provide asylum for them? etc. etc.
Posted on 6/20/18 at 4:32 pm to Big Scrub TX
How shitty is your country that you risk being separated from your kids to get out?
Posted on 6/20/18 at 4:33 pm to Big Scrub TX
They your neighbors. You tell us.
Posted on 6/20/18 at 4:33 pm to Big Scrub TX
Who are you and what have you done with Big Scrub TX?
Posted on 6/20/18 at 4:33 pm to Big Scrub TX
First, because they’re not Trump.
Second, because their Mexicans.
Second, because their Mexicans.
Posted on 6/20/18 at 4:33 pm to Big Scrub TX
Because Mexico will promptly tell them to GTFO
Posted on 6/20/18 at 4:36 pm to Big Scrub TX
Can I get a real answer? It seems like it would provide an immediate answer to the actual question here: what % of these migrants are for-real asylum-seekers and which just want a better economic deal. I still have sympathy for the latter who want to make a go of it in the US, but I also want them to go through a proper channel - not rely on some Obama "policy" of just de facto letting them in.
The evidence strongly suggests that the majority are merely economic actors posing as asylum-seekers.
The evidence strongly suggests that the majority are merely economic actors posing as asylum-seekers.
Posted on 6/20/18 at 4:38 pm to Big Scrub TX
One of the guys on here (forgot who) made a great point.
First country/point of entry for people outside of Mexico trying to come into the US designates them as refugees. If they continue north to the US, their status changed and they become immigrants.
[Trying to find out who said that, but it was solid gold and very well expressed]
First country/point of entry for people outside of Mexico trying to come into the US designates them as refugees. If they continue north to the US, their status changed and they become immigrants.
[Trying to find out who said that, but it was solid gold and very well expressed]
Posted on 6/20/18 at 4:38 pm to Big Scrub TX
I don’t know how to sugar coat this so I’ll just say it:
They are brown.
The regressive see all brown skinned people as allies (potential voters) and they get a pass.
They are brown.
The regressive see all brown skinned people as allies (potential voters) and they get a pass.
Posted on 6/20/18 at 4:40 pm to Scoop
quote:
I don’t know how to sugar coat this so I’ll just say it:
They are brown.
The regressive see all brown skinned people as allies (potential voters) and they get a pass.
You could be right. I was hoping the answer is just that we have a much higher bar of expectation out of the US than Mexico, but we're not willing to just say this out loud.
Posted on 6/20/18 at 4:54 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
What % of these "asylum seekers" at the US border are coming from south of Mexico? I thought it was a lot of them. If so, why aren't they applying for asylum in Mexico? Why isn't the world demanding that Mexico provide asylum for them? etc. etc.
mexico is just as dangerous as honduras, guatemala, el salvador. The migrants don't want to stay in danger. plus economic opportunity for them in mexico is low. Mexicans hate central americans.
who are your rooting for in the world cup?
Posted on 6/20/18 at 5:20 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Can I get a real answer? It seems like it would provide an immediate answer to the actual question here: what % of these migrants are for-real asylum-seekers and which just want a better economic deal.
quote:
... owing to well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence as a result of such events, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it ...5
pdf link
Technically, none of these people from Central America would qualify based on the official definition. I don't think "my country is a shithole" qualifies.
Maybe the violence would impact the ruling, but the violence is not from the government, it is from private parties.
Posted on 6/20/18 at 5:24 pm to Big Scrub TX
Mexico is around 50 percent caucasian by some estimates, and certainly ruled by majority whites.
They should not be immune to criticism.
They should not be immune to criticism.
Posted on 6/20/18 at 5:27 pm to Big Scrub TX
That's what I've been posting about.
But msm blah blah blah.
But msm blah blah blah.
Posted on 6/20/18 at 5:44 pm to Purple Spoon
quote:
How shitty is your country that you risk being separated from your kids to get out?
El Salvador is pretty shitty.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News