- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why do you think the government declares wars on various societal ills but the war on guns
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:26 pm to Jay Quest
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:26 pm to Jay Quest
quote:
Why would the government declare war on the Constitution?
Because that is the main planks of the dim party. They hate the constitution.
0
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:26 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Have you ever heard of gun control before?
Starts with trigger discipline
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:33 pm to St Augustine
quote:
Because guns aren't a societal ill.
What is the definition of a societal ill?
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 12:38 pm
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:42 pm to Proximo
quote:
“Gun control” is used because it’s more palatable as a propaganda word.
This makes sense.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:44 pm to moneyg
quote:Taken down? Why is everything a fight?
She pretty consistently gets taken down
It's interesting that nothing else is framed as something that needs to be controlled. I guess you don't think that's interesting but does that mean you need to lash out at me?
edit: it's funny that the knee jerk descriptor for me, a woman, is "emotional," but people like you get emotional and lash out when you read something you don't like.
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 12:48 pm
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:45 pm to 4cubbies
Cain didn't need a gun to kill Abel.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:46 pm to BeehiveTiger
quote:
It’s ‘framed differently’ because it’s a liberal cause.
There's a war on poverty. That's a liberal cause, too.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:46 pm to texridder
quote:
What is the definition of a societal ill?
Your party supporting single parent homes and a welfare system with no father available except your god, daddy government. This leads to lower education opportunities, less discipline in the home, and reliance on the people you hate to fund them.
The byproducts of these scenarios then resort to things like violent crimes (gun crimes, for the spirit of the OP), thus causing a "crisis" where people like you then want to disarm those of us who are responsible gun owners/tax payers.
If your wet dream of disarming the populace ever came to fruition, I have no doubt you would NEVER venture into the ghetto where the vast majority of these crimes are committed to take the guns. You wouldn't dream of it. You would use the same forces you did during Covid to come after the suburbs and take them there.
You really make this too easy.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:48 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
your wet dream of disarming the populace
Can you link a post of mine that advocates for restrictions on guns? Thanks.
Oh, and I live in a city. Not a suburb.
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:50 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Can you link a post of mine that advocates for restrictions on guns? Thanks.
I wasn't replying to you. You're welcome.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:51 pm to texridder
quote:
What is the definition of a societal ill?
Liberalism
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:51 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
that's a take down.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:52 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Taken down? Why is everything a fight?
I didn’t suggest a fight. I was referring to your arguments. Check your emotion at the door.
quote:
It's interesting that nothing else is framed as something that needs to be controlled. I guess you don't think that's interesting but does that mean you need to lash out at me?
I offered my real opinion of your arguments over time. Admittedly I don’t think much of you (intellectually) or them. But it’s not personal. It’s a commentary on what you post.
quote:
edit: it's funny that the knee jerk descriptor for me, a woman, is "emotional," but people like you get emotional and lash out when you read something you don't like.
Lol, you got to emotional before I did. This shows you knew that you were being emotional.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:53 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
This idiot can't possibly be a stupid as the character they play on this board
"they play"??
It's inspiring to see you use the proper pronoun. You are becoming enlightened, inch by inch.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:53 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
is framed as "gun control" instead of the war on guns or the war on gun violence?
Because it's more palatable for Americans who largely disagree with wide bands and confiscation.
"War on guns" - while fairly accurate for the progressive position - would make it harder for them to posture that "they're not interested in coming for your guns."
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:56 pm to moneyg
quote:
I didn’t suggest a fight. I was referring to your arguments. Check your emotion at the door.
What argument did I make in the OP? Funny that you're accusing me of being emotional when I essentially asked why you're rude. Very on brand for the poli board.
quote:
I offered my real opinion of your arguments over time.
No you didn't. You lashed out because words on a screen triggered you.
quote:
Lol, you got to emotional before I did. This shows you knew that you were being emotional.
Going for the "I know you are but what am I?" approach, eh?
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:57 pm to texridder
quote:
It's inspiring to see you use the proper pronoun.
4cubbies (she/her)
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:58 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
"War on guns" - while fairly accurate for the progressive position - would make it harder for them to posture that "they're not interested in coming for your guns."
It seems like "War on gun violence" would be palatable and persuasive, no? More so than "gun control" imo.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:59 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Why do you think the government declares wars on various societal ills but the war on guns
I must have missed the part in the bill of rights that pertained to "the right to distribute illegal narcotics".
quote:
is framed as "gun control" instead of the war on guns or the war on gun violence?
1) Why does this matter to you?
2) Gun violence is equally as stupid of a term as "birthing person".
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News