Started By
Message

re: Why do people become alarmed by shite that doesn't actually affect them or anyone else?

Posted on 6/29/17 at 10:45 am to
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 10:45 am to
Your confusion my be bordering on brainwashing.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Where do you draw the line between a comment that "affects no one" and words that actually count?

That seems like it should be fairly obvious. But, let's try examples.

"That lady over there is unattractive". - Doesn't imply a policy direction, doesn't have an impact on anyone's lives(to include hers). Etc.

"I think Al Sharpton's ideas are commendable and worth considering" - 100x more offensive. Actually could affect people.

Note. I used the above as EXAMPLES and they are not meant to imply a particular politician said them.

But, I figured you were asking for the line. I tried to illustrate.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 10:47 am to
quote:

Firing Comey for investigating him...


You are also confused. Thats not what happened.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 10:48 am to
quote:

Well I consider the President's comment informative about the kind of leader that he is.
Then you have exceedingly horrible criteria for figuring out if someone will be effective or not.

I realize that this is the kind of thing that's trained today. But, it has zero basis in actual historical examples of effective leaders.

quote:

They lead by example. This isn't a partisan thing.
I agree. You just don't understand what that actually means.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Firing Comey for investigating him was a bigger abuse of office than anything Obama ever did.

OK.

We may disagree on that, but THAT is something that could actually matter.

Not whether or not he thinks Comey is goofy looking.

quote:

But then, you've already made it pretty clear that while Obama's words matter, Trump's don't.
No. I said THESE words are no big deal.

As are the case with some of Obama's.

Frankly. Most of the words people get appalled at aren't that big a deal and a lot of words people don't put much thought in to are very fricking alarming.
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
41286 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 10:51 am to
I hope he tweets even meaner stuff
Posted by half cajun
Katy, TX
Member since Sep 2007
1971 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 10:52 am to
Words are evidently not irrelevant to Trump. He's perhaps the biggest snowflake around.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 10:52 am to
quote:

I realize that this is the kind of thing that's trained today. But, it has zero basis in actual historical examples of effective leaders.


If a manager in my company made a comment like Trump, he/she would be fired in an instant. It's a really bad look for a leader. Not sure why you think offensive comments are irrelevant in the professional/political world.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
82234 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 10:53 am to
quote:

You'd think Trump might have better things to do.


He was hired to do what he is doing.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 10:54 am to
quote:

I agree. You just don't understand what that actually means.


I think I do know what it means. Few people in positions of leadership say things like what Trump said on Twitter and get away with it. There's a reason for that.
This post was edited on 6/29/17 at 10:55 am
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 10:57 am to
quote:


He was hired to do what he is doing.
Tweeting and not getting any legislation passed?

He just lost more votes on healthcare
Posted by half cajun
Katy, TX
Member since Sep 2007
1971 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 10:58 am to
He wasnt hired to post bullshite on twitter. Well maybe he was by his base. But for many who voted for him, they were uncomfortable but recall he assured them he could be so presidential.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 10:58 am to
quote:

But, in the end, it's a comment that affects no one. No, it doesn't affect me because "he represents me" blah blah blah. It's just a dumb comment.


you aren't really wrong, the thing is.....

a) he sets an example for the country. He should be a role model for young and old. Do you want everyone talking like this?

b) This distracts from governing. we have enough problems in the country, we need to address those not insert new ones

Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 11:00 am to
quote:

a) he sets an example for the country. He should be a role model for young and old. Do you want everyone talking like this?

No.

quote:

b) This distracts from governing. we have enough problems in the country, we need to address those not insert new ones

Correct. Which is why I've repeatedly said it was dumb to say.

But, frankly, if everyone around me talked like that, but valued liberty and talked about valuing liberty, I'd take THAT over being surrounded by 10,000 current Americans that have perfect filters.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 11:02 am to
quote:

I think I do know what it means. Few people in positions of leadership say things like what Trump said on Twitter and get away with it. There's a reason for that today


I had to add that word for you.

Because history is FILLED with VERY effective leaders that made Trump look like a paragon of virtue.

Today, we value "makes us feel good" over "effective" in leaders.

Now, frankly, I'd like to have BOTH in a leader.

But, the former is just kind of a nice to have really.

Lots of nice people are truly shitty leaders.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63258 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 11:05 am to
quote:

a) he sets an example for the country. He should be a role model for young and old. Do you want everyone talking like this?


I mean seriously... he got a blowjob in his office from an intern. And he's worshiped by people denigrating Trump for a tweet.

quote:

b) This distracts from governing
In case you haven't noticed... these tweets usually come really close to legislative boondoggles... like healthcare. You think that's an accident?
Posted by hawkeye007
Member since Feb 2010
6297 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 11:05 am to
Trump doesn't have to be nice but he can show some respect for the office and title that he holds. He talks about a time when America was great. Well it start's at the top big guy.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 11:12 am to
quote:

I mean seriously... he got a blowjob in his office from an intern. And he's worshiped by people denigrating Trump for a tweet.


And the right killed him for it, and they made a valid critique - if he gets a blowjob from an intern, does he have any scrupples? Can we trust him with leading our country?

There answer was no. It was lead by Newt, who now defends president thinskin.

It is pathetic. The right has lost the moral highground here. And you don't realize this, but it will cause problems when you run on morality.
quote:

In case you haven't noticed... these tweets usually come really close to legislative boondoggles... like healthcare. You think that's an accident?


There are two bills up for voting on today - kate's law and denying sanctuary $$ to cities. These votes will be tough in some swing districts, mainly in the west. Do you think this tweet helps?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63258 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 11:25 am to
quote:

And the right killed him for it, and they made a valid critique - if he gets a blowjob from an intern, does he have any scrupples? Can we trust him with leading our country?

There answer was no.
Nice deflection. But I was speaking to the current critics of Trump.

quote:

It is pathetic. The right has lost the moral highground here.
The left lost it decades ago with Bill Clinton. AFter decades of parading a serial sexual harasser as a party hero, telling us "character doesn't matter" ... is not reasonable to expect "the right" to make up the difference now for that legacy of depravity.

If "the left" wants high moral standards from the Oval office... they should have called for it when they had the chance.

quote:

And you don't realize this, but it will cause problems when you run on morality
Ummm... you seem to be the one suggesting teh POTUS is the moral leader of the country. And I can't recall Trump ever claiming he was the most moral candidate in the field.

I've never suggested that ANY politician should be our moral leader. Morality is for religion, philosophy, etc. Certainly not politics. Our government was never constituted to enforce a single person's morality. In fact, it was constructed to prevent it.


quote:

There are two bills up for voting on today - kate's law and denying sanctuary $$ to cities
And you've already forgot that healthcare flopped in the Senate... looks like it worked!
This post was edited on 6/29/17 at 11:27 am
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 6/29/17 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Nice deflection. But I was speaking to the current critics of Trump.


You are the one that deflected. And it doesn't help your argument at all.
quote:

The left lost it decades ago with Bill Clinton. AFter decades of parading a serial sexual harasser as a party hero, telling us "character doesn't matter" ... is not reasonable to expect "the right" to make up the difference now for that legacy of depravity.

If "the left" wants high moral standards from the Oval office... they should have called for it when they had the chance.

Here is the thing, only one side can have the moral highground and trump's actions and the blithering defense of them by the right puts the right at a loss. So the left picks it up by default, and this is why it is a bad thing for republicans as the left normally has no claim to moral high ground.

quote:

Ummm... you seem to be the one suggesting teh POTUS is the moral leader of the country.


They don't have to be the "moral" leader but they at least need to be role model for children.
quote:

I've never suggested that ANY politician should be our moral leader. Morality is for religion, philosophy, etc. Certainly not politics. Our government was never constituted to enforce a single person's morality. In fact, it was constructed to prevent it.


I am up for the gov't have no role in morality, the right doesn't do this though. Social conservatives whole schtick is about morality.
quote:

And you've already forgot that healthcare flopped in the Senate... looks like it worked!


well it is certainly distracting from his failure. the thing is that obamacare repeal isn't going away. It will come back. Same with Russians.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram