- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why do libs harp on instititutional racism?
Posted on 8/15/19 at 8:21 am to Screaming Viking
Posted on 8/15/19 at 8:21 am to Screaming Viking
quote:
Blacks would be better off if they'd been treated as well as Asians.
quote:
Blacks would be better off if they would act like Asians. Rather straight forward.
Posted on 8/15/19 at 8:26 am to bhtigerfan
Someone.... ANYONE! Show me where institutional racism exists in any business practices.
If you can show me legit institutional racism, then I invite you to join me in beginning a business venture. We could make serious money simply by catering to those they oppress.
The Free Market cares only about profits not your race.
If you can show me legit institutional racism, then I invite you to join me in beginning a business venture. We could make serious money simply by catering to those they oppress.
The Free Market cares only about profits not your race.
Posted on 8/15/19 at 8:28 am to texridder
quote:
The magnitude of the rise of income noted is not near as meaningful as the raw income levels. Despite of the rise in black median income, the result was that, in 1960, the median income of blacks was still only approximately 60% of the median income of whites -- $3,075 compared to $5137.
So between 1939 and 1960 they made gains and were catching up to white families.
I wonder what happened between 1960 and today? If it's the same or worse does that mean there's more "institutional racism" today than during the 40s, 50s, and 60s?
Posted on 8/15/19 at 8:36 am to NC_Tigah
quote:End of discussion.
Solid points, though the derisives weren't necessary. The OP question applies to today's society though. Not that of the 1960's. If we were still living in the US of a half-century ago, harping on institutional racism would not only be warranted, it would be obligatory. But we aren't living in that era. In this era, our present era, the accusations of racism broadly directed at nonracist swaths of the populace are not helpful ... at all. In fact, as those accusations increasingly target groups, not for any offensive behavior, but rather based on skin color alone, they themselves are decidedly racist. It is an irony immediately evident to the accused, and not easily forgotten. Most of your post was respondent to racial economics. So let's discuss that. The economics of out-of-wedlock births, and single-parent households are not racist. The economics of truancy are not racist. The economics of delinquency and crime are not racist. The impact of economic dependency or substance addiction is not racist. Yet those are statistically important elements when one is sorting out reasons for social outcomes of individuals or societal subset. Inefficient or self-destructive behavior has no inherent anchor in skin color. But it does root in cultural self-expectation, and it is furthered by concomitant expectations of cultures –– aka "the soft bigotry of low expectations". Rationalizing underperformance based upon minimally or non-existent "institutional racism" plays to both detriments.
Posted on 8/15/19 at 9:23 am to texridder
quote:
His inability to appreciate his own misuse of statistics is appalling, as is your apparent similar inability.
Aww cute you talked right passed the entire point of the article. Good job
Posted on 8/15/19 at 9:24 am to 20 ton
quote:Sounds like you don’t know what one means by “institutional racism.” I recommend looking the term up and reading for ~10 minutes at least. You’re having a conversation about something else.
We can debate if the great society was meant to help or keep blacks on the plantation. Institutional racism would come in if blacks were left with no alternative. No one has been forced to be on these programs long term, much less for generations.
In 1969 births to unwed mothers for blacks was a horrific 25%. Today whites have that rate. I know of white kids skipping the shotgun wedding because it cheaper to let Uncle Sam pay for the birth. We need to look at what incentives we are promoting. It’s not all about race.
Posted on 8/15/19 at 9:31 am to xiv
quote:Nor does anyone who uses that term in the context of 21st century America.
Sounds like you don’t know what one means by “institutional racism.”
Posted on 8/15/19 at 9:32 am to Azkiger
quote:
So between 1939 and 1960 they made gains and were catching up to white families.
Yes. This point went entirely over the head of Texrider. The pains of slavery and racism prior to the civil rights movement were improving, and at drastic rates. Then LBJ fricked up all progress and reversed that progress. The entire point being that government intervention will not ever rid the pains of slavery and that there has to be a cultural change for the majority of blacks that are still in poverty to escape it. We know this is possible for non-whites in this country to be succesful inspite of racism, so blacks need to mimic the behaviors of those people who did.
Posted on 8/15/19 at 9:34 am to NC_Tigah
quote:Blanket statements are always 100% correct.
Nor does anyone who uses that term in the context of 21st century America.
Posted on 8/15/19 at 9:40 am to xiv
quote:
And with a straight face, I presume
You don’t think affirmative action is institutional racism?
Posted on 8/15/19 at 9:44 am to windshieldman
quote:That’s what you think I found wrong with that statement?
You don’t think affirmative action is institutional racism?
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:00 am to xiv
is he supposed to read your mind?
you didn't say what you didn't like about it. you just made a smarmy comment to avoid having to give a rebuttal.
if you'd like to actually be clear, you could state what you don't like about his comment, then maybe you could even try to make a point of your own.
i'd be interested to hear how AF isn't IR.
you didn't say what you didn't like about it. you just made a smarmy comment to avoid having to give a rebuttal.
if you'd like to actually be clear, you could state what you don't like about his comment, then maybe you could even try to make a point of your own.
i'd be interested to hear how AF isn't IR.
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:04 am to Logician
quote:Instead of lecture me, why not read the thread? This has been covered.
if you'd like to actually be clear, you could state what you don't like about his comment, then maybe you could even try to make a point of your own.
i'd be interested to hear how AF isn't IR.
quote:Nah. The thread will do.
is he supposed to read your mind?
This post was edited on 8/15/19 at 10:05 am
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:08 am to Janky
quote:.
What else are they gonna run on, ideas? Economy?
Beat me to it.
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:10 am to BoyHowdy
They rely on “racism” because it is their ace in the hole. If and when they feel as though their argument is not winning, they say racism! Even if it doesn’t apply. It’s childish and reeks of a lack of personal accountability. We all live in America, there are no barriers for anyone to do anything. This is nothing more that institutionalized victim mentality.
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:11 am to xiv
so you're unwilling or unable to address institutional racism specifically is it relates to affirmative action. that's unfortunate. i was looking forward to reading that.
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:18 am to Logician
It’s in the thread. Go find it if it means so much to you.
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:19 am to xiv
quote:
It’s in the thread. Go find it if it means so much to you.
Why don't you just tell us what you think instead of sending him on a scavenger hunt through multiple pages?
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:20 am to xiv
quote:
xiv
How was your first day back in middle school, boy?
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:20 am to SidewalkDawg
quote:Troll with low energy is the reason.
Why don't you just tell us what you think instead of sending him on a scavenger hunt through multiple pages?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News