Started By
Message

re: Why do libs harp on instititutional racism?

Posted on 8/15/19 at 8:21 am to
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29414 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 8:21 am to
quote:

Blacks would be better off if they'd been treated as well as Asians.

quote:

Blacks would be better off if they would act like Asians. Rather straight forward.
Posted by SidewalkDawg
Chair
Member since Nov 2012
9820 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 8:26 am to
Someone.... ANYONE! Show me where institutional racism exists in any business practices.

If you can show me legit institutional racism, then I invite you to join me in beginning a business venture. We could make serious money simply by catering to those they oppress.

The Free Market cares only about profits not your race.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21523 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 8:28 am to
quote:

The magnitude of the rise of income noted is not near as meaningful as the raw income levels. Despite of the rise in black median income, the result was that, in 1960, the median income of blacks was still only approximately 60% of the median income of whites -- $3,075 compared to $5137.


So between 1939 and 1960 they made gains and were catching up to white families.

I wonder what happened between 1960 and today? If it's the same or worse does that mean there's more "institutional racism" today than during the 40s, 50s, and 60s?
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29414 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Solid points, though the derisives weren't necessary. The OP question applies to today's society though. Not that of the 1960's. If we were still living in the US of a half-century ago, harping on institutional racism would not only be warranted, it would be obligatory. But we aren't living in that era. In this era, our present era, the accusations of racism broadly directed at nonracist swaths of the populace are not helpful ... at all. In fact, as those accusations increasingly target groups, not for any offensive behavior, but rather based on skin color alone, they themselves are decidedly racist. It is an irony immediately evident to the accused, and not easily forgotten. Most of your post was respondent to racial economics. So let's discuss that. The economics of out-of-wedlock births, and single-parent households are not racist. The economics of truancy are not racist. The economics of delinquency and crime are not racist. The impact of economic dependency or substance addiction is not racist. Yet those are statistically important elements when one is sorting out reasons for social outcomes of individuals or societal subset. Inefficient or self-destructive behavior has no inherent anchor in skin color. But it does root in cultural self-expectation, and it is furthered by concomitant expectations of cultures –– aka "the soft bigotry of low expectations". Rationalizing underperformance based upon minimally or non-existent "institutional racism" plays to both detriments.
End of discussion.
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11079 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 9:23 am to
quote:

His inability to appreciate his own misuse of statistics is appalling, as is your apparent similar inability.



Aww cute you talked right passed the entire point of the article. Good job
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 9:24 am to
quote:

We can debate if the great society was meant to help or keep blacks on the plantation. Institutional racism would come in if blacks were left with no alternative. No one has been forced to be on these programs long term, much less for generations.

In 1969 births to unwed mothers for blacks was a horrific 25%. Today whites have that rate. I know of white kids skipping the shotgun wedding because it cheaper to let Uncle Sam pay for the birth. We need to look at what incentives we are promoting. It’s not all about race.
Sounds like you don’t know what one means by “institutional racism.” I recommend looking the term up and reading for ~10 minutes at least. You’re having a conversation about something else.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123814 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Sounds like you don’t know what one means by “institutional racism.”
Nor does anyone who uses that term in the context of 21st century America.
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11079 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 9:32 am to
quote:

So between 1939 and 1960 they made gains and were catching up to white families.



Yes. This point went entirely over the head of Texrider. The pains of slavery and racism prior to the civil rights movement were improving, and at drastic rates. Then LBJ fricked up all progress and reversed that progress. The entire point being that government intervention will not ever rid the pains of slavery and that there has to be a cultural change for the majority of blacks that are still in poverty to escape it. We know this is possible for non-whites in this country to be succesful inspite of racism, so blacks need to mimic the behaviors of those people who did.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 9:34 am to
quote:

Nor does anyone who uses that term in the context of 21st century America.
Blanket statements are always 100% correct.
Posted by windshieldman
Member since Nov 2012
12818 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 9:40 am to
quote:

And with a straight face, I presume


You don’t think affirmative action is institutional racism?
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 9:44 am to
quote:

You don’t think affirmative action is institutional racism?
That’s what you think I found wrong with that statement?
Posted by Logician
Grinning Colonizer
Member since Jul 2013
4511 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:00 am to
is he supposed to read your mind?

you didn't say what you didn't like about it. you just made a smarmy comment to avoid having to give a rebuttal.

if you'd like to actually be clear, you could state what you don't like about his comment, then maybe you could even try to make a point of your own.

i'd be interested to hear how AF isn't IR.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:04 am to
quote:

if you'd like to actually be clear, you could state what you don't like about his comment, then maybe you could even try to make a point of your own.

i'd be interested to hear how AF isn't IR.
Instead of lecture me, why not read the thread? This has been covered.
quote:

is he supposed to read your mind?
Nah. The thread will do.
This post was edited on 8/15/19 at 10:05 am
Posted by AustinTigr
Austin, TX
Member since Dec 2004
2937 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:08 am to
quote:

What else are they gonna run on, ideas? Economy?
.

Beat me to it.
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
16143 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:10 am to
They rely on “racism” because it is their ace in the hole. If and when they feel as though their argument is not winning, they say racism! Even if it doesn’t apply. It’s childish and reeks of a lack of personal accountability. We all live in America, there are no barriers for anyone to do anything. This is nothing more that institutionalized victim mentality.
Posted by Logician
Grinning Colonizer
Member since Jul 2013
4511 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:11 am to
so you're unwilling or unable to address institutional racism specifically is it relates to affirmative action. that's unfortunate. i was looking forward to reading that.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:18 am to
It’s in the thread. Go find it if it means so much to you.
Posted by SidewalkDawg
Chair
Member since Nov 2012
9820 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:19 am to
quote:

It’s in the thread. Go find it if it means so much to you.


Why don't you just tell us what you think instead of sending him on a scavenger hunt through multiple pages?
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
34957 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:20 am to
quote:

xiv

How was your first day back in middle school, boy?
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73424 posts
Posted on 8/15/19 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Why don't you just tell us what you think instead of sending him on a scavenger hunt through multiple pages?

Troll with low energy is the reason.
first pageprev pagePage 17 of 19Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram