Why do folks try so hard to distinguish between homosexuality and pedophilia?

The real question is, is homosexuality a deviancy or perhaps a kinder word: a disorder. If it isn’t, then the folks adamant about keeping the two groups separate are correct. If homosexuality is a disorder, then it follows that homos are MUCH more likely to be pedos.

Once the line of what is truly natural is crossed, its much more easy to delve further, it’s just human nature. It might be that certain characteristics deemed unattractive, contribute to that decline? Being fat, or old or having an unattractive personality might isolate a homo from other willing partners, so they turn to situations they can control for their deviant gratification. You could argue the same against heterosexuals, but then it goes back to who does not have the self-discipline to stay within the boundaries of what’s normal. Obviously there are cases in both camps. But crossing the line of what’s normal into the deviant, makes the cross section of homos more probable candidates to become groomers.

Is that line of reasoning wrong? I’m looking at you CA and perhaps Wed.

I have read and said some stupid sheet in my life. This tops it all. You are a full on idiot. Just one example title: h and p are indistinguishable. First paragraph: h are much more likely to be p’s. Idiocy on its face. There is really way too much dunbassery here to further discuss. Enjoy your deviance this rainy Sunday.

quote:

---

Point is, we need to stop groomers, regardless of straight / gay.

---

Agreed.

Don't care which team is committing the offense, they should be removed.

However I DO have a problem with agenda-driven people trying to deflect and lie about the instances of homosexual pedophilia.

It exists and when you LIE and push idiotic, dishonest studies to say otherwise, you are doing more harm than good.

Distinguishing different behaviors is important in psychology. It's not just homosexuality and pedophilia. There is also hebephilia or ephebophilia which involves an adult's sexual attraction to young people post puberty (12-16 y.o.).

quote:

---

But crossing the line of what’s normal into the deviant,

---

There is no bright line for that. We used to think a girl showing her ankles was a slut.

Somebody got butthurt

Advertisement

quote:

---

thatsnotmydog

---

Best Pink Panther bit of all time.

Not all queers are pedos.

But all pedos are queer.

Pedophilia is not exclusive to the gay community any more than serial killing and mass shooting is exclusive to the white male community.

Most convicted pedophiles don’t identify as gay.

You shouldn’t paint with such broad stokes.

quote:

---

Once the line of what is truly natural is crossed, its much more easy to delve further, it’s just human nature. It might be that certain characteristics deemed unattractive, contribute to that decline? Being fat, or old or having an unattractive personality might isolate a homo from other willing partners, so they turn to situations they can control for their deviant gratification. You could argue the same against heterosexuals, but then it goes back to who does not have the self-discipline to stay within the boundaries of what’s normal. Obviously there are cases in both camps. But crossing the line of what’s normal into the deviant, makes the cross section of homos more probable candidates to become groomers.

Is that line of reasoning wrong? I’m looking at you CA and perhaps Wed.

---

I have been saying something like this for years.

Society sets sexual norms and acceptance. For instance when I was growing up in the 60's sodomy was illegal even in your own home, homosexuality was taboo and illegal in some places, Trans was not even a possibility, and even sex outside of marriage was less common.

From a pure Science perspective anything beyond the act of procreation for survival of the species is more than biologically necessary. Since the beginning of social order in tribes and such mankind has set sexual morals for its members.

Therefore you can go and study history and see the evolution of the sexual conduct and its level of acceptance based on social evolution. Darwin would teach us that the new found acceptance of non procreation acts is just control of the species.