- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why do folks try so hard to distinguish between homosexuality and pedophilia?
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:03 am
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:03 am
The real question is, is homosexuality a deviancy or perhaps a kinder word: a disorder. If it isn’t, then the folks adamant about keeping the two groups separate are correct. If homosexuality is a disorder, then it follows that homos are MUCH more likely to be pedos.
Once the line of what is truly natural is crossed, its much more easy to delve further, it’s just human nature. It might be that certain characteristics deemed unattractive, contribute to that decline? Being fat, or old or having an unattractive personality might isolate a homo from other willing partners, so they turn to situations they can control for their deviant gratification. You could argue the same against heterosexuals, but then it goes back to who does not have the self-discipline to stay within the boundaries of what’s normal. Obviously there are cases in both camps. But crossing the line of what’s normal into the deviant, makes the cross section of homos more probable candidates to become groomers.
Is that line of reasoning wrong? I’m looking at you CA and perhaps Wed.
Once the line of what is truly natural is crossed, its much more easy to delve further, it’s just human nature. It might be that certain characteristics deemed unattractive, contribute to that decline? Being fat, or old or having an unattractive personality might isolate a homo from other willing partners, so they turn to situations they can control for their deviant gratification. You could argue the same against heterosexuals, but then it goes back to who does not have the self-discipline to stay within the boundaries of what’s normal. Obviously there are cases in both camps. But crossing the line of what’s normal into the deviant, makes the cross section of homos more probable candidates to become groomers.
Is that line of reasoning wrong? I’m looking at you CA and perhaps Wed.
22
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:08 am to Padme
I just assume there's a tiny % of humans who are void of any filters or concept of what's right and wrong. There's not many of them, percentage wise, but they're everywhere. When they're both gay and have an unhealthy eye for the young ones, the danger is amplified.
Point is, we need to stop groomers, regardless of straight / gay.
Point is, we need to stop groomers, regardless of straight / gay.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:08 am to Padme
I have read and said some stupid sheet in my life. This tops it all. You are a full on idiot. Just one example title: h and p are indistinguishable. First paragraph: h are much more likely to be p’s. Idiocy on its face. There is really way too much dunbassery here to further discuss. Enjoy your deviance this rainy Sunday.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:15 am to Padme
I support neither of those things.
Homosexuality is now both acceptable and approved of by most of the world.
Pedophilia is on its way to such support.
The world is ripe for destruction. God willing.
Homosexuality is now both acceptable and approved of by most of the world.
Pedophilia is on its way to such support.
The world is ripe for destruction. God willing.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:16 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Point is, we need to stop groomers, regardless of straight / gay.
Agreed.
Don't care which team is committing the offense, they should be removed.
However I DO have a problem with agenda-driven people trying to deflect and lie about the instances of homosexual pedophilia.
It exists and when you LIE and push idiotic, dishonest studies to say otherwise, you are doing more harm than good.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:20 am to oogabooga68
The distinction is that two adults doing stuff together is different than an adult pursuing a child and taking advantage of the child's physical weakness, and trust.
If two adults consent to bugger each other, that's one thing.
An adult pursuing a child sexually is a whole different level of frickery.
The distinction isn't really all that hard to make.
If two adults consent to bugger each other, that's one thing.
An adult pursuing a child sexually is a whole different level of frickery.
The distinction isn't really all that hard to make.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:21 am to Padme
Distinguishing different behaviors is important in psychology. It's not just homosexuality and pedophilia. There is also hebephilia or ephebophilia which involves an adult's sexual attraction to young people post puberty (12-16 y.o.).
There is no bright line for that. We used to think a girl showing her ankles was a slut.
quote:
But crossing the line of what’s normal into the deviant,
There is no bright line for that. We used to think a girl showing her ankles was a slut.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:22 am to Padme
Both are deviations from what is sexually attractive from what is considered as normal by most members of a society. Gays are just gay and I really don't care, it's not my business what free people do in their bedroom. Pedophiles harm children. This harm is frequently life altering for the children and many never move beyond it. So to me one is very different than the other.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:22 am to thatsnotmydog
Somebody got butthurt
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:23 am to Padme
The sad fact is sexual deviance is sexual deviance…. Once it is accepted into society as normal it is all downhill from there…
Of course it is always argued that there is no slippery slope but look where we find ourselves today…
Unfortunately God has given many over to a depraved mind and many have exchanged the Truth for a lie and the natural for the unnatural…
Of course it is always argued that there is no slippery slope but look where we find ourselves today…
Unfortunately God has given many over to a depraved mind and many have exchanged the Truth for a lie and the natural for the unnatural…
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:25 am to oogabooga68
quote:
However I DO have a problem with agenda-driven people trying to deflect and lie about the instances of homosexual pedophilia.
It exists and when you LIE and push idiotic, dishonest studies to say otherwise, you are doing more harm than good.
This all day. If you can’t break from the agenda and have open eyes, you are part of the problem
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:26 am to thatsnotmydog
quote:Best Pink Panther bit of all time.
thatsnotmydog
This post was edited on 12/11/22 at 10:13 am
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:28 am to Padme
Both stem from sexual sin. Marriage (between man and woman) was created functionally for procreation and as an outlet for sexual desire. You can see those who rebel against God seeking to destroy what He has created good so that they can prop up their own autonomy. Marriage is being redefined and minimized. Sexual desires and actions of all stripes are legitimized and promoted. Even children are devalued.
A worldview that rejects God—the creator of all things—must eventually tolerate all kinds of “unnatural”, “perverse”, and “degenerate” behaviors, because there is no basis for objective moral reasoning without God, and therefore there is no basis for condemning anything as truly “wrong”.
A worldview that rejects God—the creator of all things—must eventually tolerate all kinds of “unnatural”, “perverse”, and “degenerate” behaviors, because there is no basis for objective moral reasoning without God, and therefore there is no basis for condemning anything as truly “wrong”.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:28 am to AggieHank86
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:28 am to Padme
You rape a boy, its homo
You rape a girl, its hetero.
Over-thinking, over-analyzing separates the body from the mind.
Withering my intuition, missing opportunities ...
You rape a girl, its hetero.
Over-thinking, over-analyzing separates the body from the mind.
Withering my intuition, missing opportunities ...
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:30 am to Padme
Not all queers are pedos.
But all pedos are queer.
But all pedos are queer.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:30 am to FooManChoo
quote:
worldview that rejects God
Therein lies the problem. The nut.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:31 am to Padme
Pedophilia is not exclusive to the gay community any more than serial killing and mass shooting is exclusive to the white male community.
Most convicted pedophiles don’t identify as gay.
You shouldn’t paint with such broad stokes.
Most convicted pedophiles don’t identify as gay.
You shouldn’t paint with such broad stokes.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:33 am to ibldprplgld
quote:
Pedophilia is not exclusive to the gay community
True.
with many its a crime of opportunity.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 9:33 am to Padme
quote:
Once the line of what is truly natural is crossed, its much more easy to delve further, it’s just human nature. It might be that certain characteristics deemed unattractive, contribute to that decline? Being fat, or old or having an unattractive personality might isolate a homo from other willing partners, so they turn to situations they can control for their deviant gratification. You could argue the same against heterosexuals, but then it goes back to who does not have the self-discipline to stay within the boundaries of what’s normal. Obviously there are cases in both camps. But crossing the line of what’s normal into the deviant, makes the cross section of homos more probable candidates to become groomers.
Is that line of reasoning wrong? I’m looking at you CA and perhaps Wed.
I have been saying something like this for years.
Society sets sexual norms and acceptance. For instance when I was growing up in the 60's sodomy was illegal even in your own home, homosexuality was taboo and illegal in some places, Trans was not even a possibility, and even sex outside of marriage was less common.
From a pure Science perspective anything beyond the act of procreation for survival of the species is more than biologically necessary. Since the beginning of social order in tribes and such mankind has set sexual morals for its members.
Therefore you can go and study history and see the evolution of the sexual conduct and its level of acceptance based on social evolution. Darwin would teach us that the new found acceptance of non procreation acts is just control of the species.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News