- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why didn't the Repubs pass a bill while they controlled both houses that had the money
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:25 pm
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:25 pm
For the wall included. Why wait until they lost the house?
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:26 pm to doya2
For frick’s sake this has been gone over about a hundred times now.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:27 pm to doya2
How many times do we have to go over this?
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:28 pm to doya2
Jesus, this has been discussed 100 times. You need 60 votes in the Senate not just a majority. Would have never passed and will not ever pass. They are literally doing anything to derail Trump regardless of its good for the country or not. They have lost their minds and shite in the American people all for power.
This post was edited on 1/9/19 at 7:29 pm
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:30 pm to doya2
Because the senate needs 60 votes to end debate on a bill and bring it to an actual vote. We never had anywhere close to the 60 needed to end debate.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:32 pm to doya2
Holy fricking shite!! Why the frick is this thread started every single fricking day???
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:33 pm to doya2
quote:
For the wall included. Why wait until they lost the house?
Because even some republicans are soft on conservative values when it conflicts with their donors and future income opportunities. There are a ton of those guys (eg Paul Ryan) that thought that their agenda is more important than the agenda of the voters that elected Trump.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:38 pm to SlapahoeTribe
quote:
How many times do we have to go over this?
It is not unreasonable to think that control of both houses of Congress and the White House should be enough to accomplish a top priority of any administration.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:39 pm to SaintNation
quote:
Jesus, this has been discussed 100 times. You need 60 votes in the Senate not just a majority. Would have never passed and will not ever pass
So why not take a stand then, why now?
Didn’t want to make the Repubs look bad?
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:40 pm to doya2
Asking this question should result in a 1 day ban. Seriously.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:40 pm to SaintNation
quote:
You need 60 votes in the Senate
They could have done it through budget reconciliation, and only needed 50 votes. The truth is they didn't because the wall isn't even very popular with Republicans.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:40 pm to SaintNation
Nuclear option. Could have been done, but wasn't. Only mitch and trump know why.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:45 pm to doya2
Because trump can't close a deal.
Everything else is excuses.
Everything else is excuses.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:49 pm to mahdragonz
Let me put this in terms you might understand.
DC=Alabama/REC
Trump is Big 10 refs.
Trump trying to introduce a wall is akin to cutting off their votes/money supply (or favorable calls for a sure win to get a NC).
Can't work a deal with people who are used to the old guard and want things to stay in their favor.
DC=Alabama/REC
Trump is Big 10 refs.
Trump trying to introduce a wall is akin to cutting off their votes/money supply (or favorable calls for a sure win to get a NC).
Can't work a deal with people who are used to the old guard and want things to stay in their favor.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:50 pm to Tiger Prawn
He had a better chance last year than he does now. The GOP had the House and and a bunch of Dem Senators trying to get reelected in red states.
This year you still need to convince Dem Senators, however the vulnerable ones lost reelection last year or were reelected and won't have to face voters for another six years. Not to mention, he has to get Pelosi to sign off on it.
2018 was the perfect time for getting a deal done IMO.
This year you still need to convince Dem Senators, however the vulnerable ones lost reelection last year or were reelected and won't have to face voters for another six years. Not to mention, he has to get Pelosi to sign off on it.
2018 was the perfect time for getting a deal done IMO.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:53 pm to The Spleen
quote:
They could have done it through budget reconciliation, and only needed 50 votes. The truth is they didn't because the wall isn't even very popular with Republicans.
You mean globalist RINO's not Republicans.
This post was edited on 1/9/19 at 7:56 pm
Posted on 1/9/19 at 7:55 pm to DaTruth225
To Trump's credit, he actually did try all of last year to get it done, but failed for several reasons. Mainly because, as I stated above, Republican support was far from unanimous on it.
It escalated over the last month because he knew his last chnace to get it done was before the new House was seated with a Dem majority.
The question to ask is why McConnel and Ryan didn't do more to get wall funding.
It escalated over the last month because he knew his last chnace to get it done was before the new House was seated with a Dem majority.
The question to ask is why McConnel and Ryan didn't do more to get wall funding.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 8:07 pm to doya2
Anyone that starts this thread in the next week should be banned from the political form .
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News