- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why didn't the Hard Rock building collapse like WTC building 7?
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:26 am to GumboPot
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:26 am to GumboPot
to the OP: you are showing monumental ignorance to compare these events with some obvious differences.
To claim that all collapses or partial collapses are of the same cause and happen the same way is equivalent to saying that the Pan Am jet's explosion over Lockerbie proves that no plane hit the Pentagon.
To claim that all collapses or partial collapses are of the same cause and happen the same way is equivalent to saying that the Pan Am jet's explosion over Lockerbie proves that no plane hit the Pentagon.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:27 am to GumboPot
So you're telling me different scenarios are different? Get outta town!
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:28 am to GumboPot
quote:
I thought buildings were supposed to always pancake when they collapse.
No one said this ever
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:28 am to JPinLondon
quote:
To claim that all collapses or partial collapses are of the same cause and happen the same way is equivalent to saying that the Pan Am jet's explosion over Lockerbie proves that no plane hit the Pentagon.
But not only did 911 have WTC 7 do a pancake collapse but WTC 1 and 2 also. Amazing coincidence.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:29 am to upgrayedd
quote:
So you're telling me different scenarios are different?
100% different.
One was an accident.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:30 am to GumboPot
quote:
But not only did 911 have WTC 7 do a pancake collapse but WTC 1 and 2 also. Amazing coincidence.
Bush and Cheney did a really good job when they personally wired the buildings for demolition. Then had the Israelis fly radio controlled airplanes into them.

Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:30 am to GumboPot
You think it's feasible to prep 85 beams for demo and actually blow them with no one ever noticing?
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:31 am to upgrayedd
This thread is embarrassing for the OP
just pathetic
just pathetic
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:31 am to GumboPot
My limited understanding of the WTC collapses was that the fire and intense heat from the burning Jet A caused the towers structural integrity to be compromised resulting in the pancake collapse.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:32 am to ShortyRob
He's got such a hard on for this nonsense. It's amazing how this shite turns seemingly rational people into perpetual emotional tail-chasers.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:32 am to GumboPot
quote:
100% different.
One was an accident.
I love arguing with you conspiracists.. it is kindof fun. But it is a bit like LSU playing Vanderbilt. Guess who you are, though?!?!
Ok, so give me your best whiz-bang internet theory as to why you KNOW that WTC-7 was demolished on purpose with explosives.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:32 am to GumboPot
Tell us about the thermite powder and how Bushdidit with techniques that have never been used before or since. Give me about 3 minutes to put the popcorn in the microwave.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:33 am to OchoDedos
Bruh, we're about to get some lecture about nanothermite and other mystery materials that no one can recreate.
ETA: jawnybnsc knows what's up
ETA: jawnybnsc knows what's up
This post was edited on 10/17/19 at 9:34 am
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:35 am to upgrayedd
All I know is if I wanted to bring a building down in a symmetrical fashion like a controlled demolition using thhermite to cut structural members is a good choice especially if you want to hide forensic evident. Ferric oxide and aluminum oxide are well hidden among normal building materials.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:36 am to upgrayedd
quote:
He's got such a hard on for this nonsense. It's amazing how this shite turns seemingly rational people into perpetual emotional tail-chasers.
I have a hard on for it because no one can explain the science behind it.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:37 am to GumboPot
You don't actually believe that's what happened, do you?
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:37 am to GumboPot
Why the hell would anyone build a Casino there anyways? That looks like a 3rd world country.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:38 am to GumboPot
quote:
All I know is if I wanted to bring a building down in a symmetrical fashion like a controlled demolition using thhermite to cut structural members is a good choice especially if you want to hide forensic evident. Ferric oxide and aluminum oxide are well hidden among normal building materials.
Well goddamned. If that statement isn't 100% proof the OP is right, then I don't know what is.
Congrats OP, you changed my mind. Being on fire ALL DAY and having parts of a 110 story skyscraper land on WTC-7 had nothing to do with its collapse. I stand corrected.
Popular
Back to top
