Started By
Message

re: Why didn't the Hard Rock building collapse like WTC building 7?

Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:26 am to
Posted by JPinLondon
not in London (currently NW Ohio)
Member since Nov 2006
7855 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:26 am to
to the OP: you are showing monumental ignorance to compare these events with some obvious differences.

To claim that all collapses or partial collapses are of the same cause and happen the same way is equivalent to saying that the Pan Am jet's explosion over Lockerbie proves that no plane hit the Pentagon.
Posted by Bunta
Member since Oct 2007
12521 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:26 am to
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
137059 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:27 am to
So you're telling me different scenarios are different? Get outta town!
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:28 am to
quote:


I thought buildings were supposed to always pancake when they collapse.

No one said this ever
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
133665 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:28 am to
quote:

To claim that all collapses or partial collapses are of the same cause and happen the same way is equivalent to saying that the Pan Am jet's explosion over Lockerbie proves that no plane hit the Pentagon.



But not only did 911 have WTC 7 do a pancake collapse but WTC 1 and 2 also. Amazing coincidence.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
133665 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:29 am to
quote:

So you're telling me different scenarios are different?


100% different.

One was an accident.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:30 am to
quote:

But not only did 911 have WTC 7 do a pancake collapse but WTC 1 and 2 also. Amazing coincidence.


Bush and Cheney did a really good job when they personally wired the buildings for demolition. Then had the Israelis fly radio controlled airplanes into them.

Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
137059 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:30 am to
You think it's feasible to prep 85 beams for demo and actually blow them with no one ever noticing?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:31 am to
This thread is embarrassing for the OP

just pathetic
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
38361 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:31 am to
My limited understanding of the WTC collapses was that the fire and intense heat from the burning Jet A caused the towers structural integrity to be compromised resulting in the pancake collapse.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
60856 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:31 am to
Stupid post
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
137059 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:32 am to
He's got such a hard on for this nonsense. It's amazing how this shite turns seemingly rational people into perpetual emotional tail-chasers.
Posted by JPinLondon
not in London (currently NW Ohio)
Member since Nov 2006
7855 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:32 am to
quote:

100% different.

One was an accident.

I love arguing with you conspiracists.. it is kindof fun. But it is a bit like LSU playing Vanderbilt. Guess who you are, though?!?!

Ok, so give me your best whiz-bang internet theory as to why you KNOW that WTC-7 was demolished on purpose with explosives.
Posted by jawnybnsc
Greer, SC
Member since Dec 2016
5568 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:32 am to
Tell us about the thermite powder and how Bushdidit with techniques that have never been used before or since. Give me about 3 minutes to put the popcorn in the microwave.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
137059 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:33 am to
Bruh, we're about to get some lecture about nanothermite and other mystery materials that no one can recreate.

ETA: jawnybnsc knows what's up
This post was edited on 10/17/19 at 9:34 am
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
133665 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:35 am to
All I know is if I wanted to bring a building down in a symmetrical fashion like a controlled demolition using thhermite to cut structural members is a good choice especially if you want to hide forensic evident. Ferric oxide and aluminum oxide are well hidden among normal building materials.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
133665 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:36 am to
quote:

He's got such a hard on for this nonsense. It's amazing how this shite turns seemingly rational people into perpetual emotional tail-chasers.




I have a hard on for it because no one can explain the science behind it.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:37 am to
You don't actually believe that's what happened, do you?
Posted by MileHighDraw
Member since May 2018
1878 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:37 am to
Why the hell would anyone build a Casino there anyways? That looks like a 3rd world country.
Posted by JPinLondon
not in London (currently NW Ohio)
Member since Nov 2006
7855 posts
Posted on 10/17/19 at 9:38 am to
quote:

All I know is if I wanted to bring a building down in a symmetrical fashion like a controlled demolition using thhermite to cut structural members is a good choice especially if you want to hide forensic evident. Ferric oxide and aluminum oxide are well hidden among normal building materials.

Well goddamned. If that statement isn't 100% proof the OP is right, then I don't know what is.

Congrats OP, you changed my mind. Being on fire ALL DAY and having parts of a 110 story skyscraper land on WTC-7 had nothing to do with its collapse. I stand corrected.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram