- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why can’t the citizenry have nuclear material to make a bomb 4 personal protection?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:58 pm to Covingtontiger77
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:58 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
Does me wanting the right of the citizenry the ability to buy nuclear material bother you?
Not at all, in fact get of TD and start pushing this campaign please.
0
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:58 pm to BACONisMEATcandy
quote:
Because the courts ruled there are limits to Arms. The same reason I can’t have a machine gun made prior to 1986 or a grenade launcher. The courts have already ruled that semi automatic weapons are protected under the 2nd Amendment. If you really want this changed stop posting on TD and petition the courts
Ahhh limits on weaponary for citizenry, got it. Just not now- makes sense.
Oh it’s coming, the climate has changed in this country. Watch and see.
#Nolimit2A
This post was edited on 2/19/18 at 2:00 pm
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:58 pm to Covingtontiger77
There shouldn't be. Citizens should be allowed to own any type of weapon.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:59 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
Why not...why should there be any restrictions on my ability to regulate my milita or protect my family against the tyranny of govt?!?!
There shouldn't be any limits.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 2:00 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:Toddy was fapping over this line of thinking as well, so about those judges are they going to be swayed by the winds of change?
Oh it’s coming, the climate has changed in this country. Watch and see.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 2:01 pm to Covingtontiger77
Read the holding in United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939).
This case held that the Constitution protected the right to keep and bear arms that are "part of the ordinary military equipment" or the use of which could "contribute to the common defense." This necessarily wouldn't include a nuclear weapon.
This case held that the Constitution protected the right to keep and bear arms that are "part of the ordinary military equipment" or the use of which could "contribute to the common defense." This necessarily wouldn't include a nuclear weapon.
This post was edited on 2/19/18 at 2:09 pm
Posted on 2/19/18 at 2:01 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
Ahhh limits on weaponary for citizenry, got it.
Yep. 2A doesn’t protect weapons. It protects arms. There are plenty of weapons that fall outside the scope of the second amendment.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 2:01 pm to Covingtontiger77
Please buy some nuclear material. Sit it next to your bed while you sleep.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 2:01 pm to Covingtontiger77
So, this is your reaction from being destroyed in another gun thread? Damn they triggered you.
Nice melt though. Stop being so emotional you fricking woman.
Nice melt though. Stop being so emotional you fricking woman.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 2:03 pm to Covingtontiger77
You realize it was this SCOTUS that said Semi Automatic weapons were protected right?
Also you are aware you are complaining about 0.0001625% of AR15’s right (that’s the actual number)
Also you are aware you are complaining about 0.0001625% of AR15’s right (that’s the actual number)
Posted on 2/19/18 at 2:03 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
Why not...why should there be any restrictions on my ability to regulate my milita or protect my family against the tyranny of govt?!?!
Does this mean I get my bazooka?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 2:03 pm to Covingtontiger77
Go ahead and make nukes. Leave the govt out of it. But your HOA might fine you.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 2:04 pm to Dead End
He’s really going to melt when he finds out most of us are likely exempt from background checks
Posted on 2/19/18 at 2:04 pm to asurob1
quote:
Does this mean I get my bazooka?
As long as it's not black, doesn't have a high capacity clip, and doesn't have an assault grip.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 2:04 pm to asurob1
quote:That's what your old lady got last night while you sat and watched ice dancing cuckboy.
Does this mean I get my bazooka?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 2:04 pm to Covingtontiger77
Are you using the fact that limits and controls in the 2nd amendment are in place as an argument that we don't have limits and controls on the 2nd amendment?
Nice.
Nice.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 2:05 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
Why not...why should there be any restrictions on my ability to regulate my milita or protect my family against the tyranny of govt?!?!
Wow. An assault weapons ban supporter equating a bayonet lug, folding stock and flash hider with a nuclear weapon. All of those were acceptable on bolt and lever action firearms during the ban.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 2:05 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
2A - No limits
Your freedom ends when it directly effects me and mine.
Your isotopes decay in range of my family, and you're not bright enough to weaponize it anyway.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 2:05 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
Why not...why should there be any restrictions on my ability to regulate my milita or protect my family against the tyranny of govt?!?!
Sore loser lefties always make absurd projections when they can't disprove the reasonable and rational logic of right-wingers.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 2:10 pm to Aristo
quote:
Nice nuclear meltdown.
He's been vaporized by Trump's nuclear bomb victory.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News