Started By
Message

re: Why can’t America have bullet trains?

Posted on 1/9/25 at 4:05 am to
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
32516 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 4:05 am to
quote:

Americans prefer freedom to 18th century technology.


Trains are 18th century tech?
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
43195 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 6:48 am to
Yep. Old concept.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 6:51 am to
Good luck with getting any massive public projects built with a large footprint.

Environmental payoffs make it take too long and cost too much. Too many hands reaching into the till.

Our overly regulated and litigious society is handicapped.
Posted by azcatiger
somewhere
Member since Mar 2011
5370 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 6:53 am to
Our money goes to other countries to build their nice shite.
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
61405 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 7:03 am to
quote:

Why can’t America have bullet trains?



Why can’t we educate young people and truly prepare them for the world that awaits them?


Why is our healthcare so outrageously expensive and financially crippling compared to most everywhere else on this planet?


There are lots of things in my estimation that register significantly higher up on the “Why can’t America” list than bullet trains.


Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
67649 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 7:10 am to
High speed trains are great, but many Americans are not very enthusiastic about rail travel. And that’s unfortunate.
The trains in Europe are fast and convenient .

Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
62589 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 7:44 am to
It would be amazing to have between Dallas and Houston and San Antonio and from Houston to New Orleans but that wouldn’t be as busy

Posted by KRS
Member since Jun 2022
521 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 7:46 am to
BC Americans can't seem to stop for the trains. There always a story on the news about a car, truck, semi or fire trucks running thru the stops. Or parking on them.
Posted by dalefla
Central FL
Member since Jul 2024
3482 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 7:51 am to
quote:

They never tried. They just laundered the money - just like Joe's $42B high speed internet that doesn't have a single rural customer connected.


Now do EV charging stations. All of these type projects are just money laundering schemes for politicians and people connected to them.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75480 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 7:59 am to
Indeed. That misadventure where the SecEnergy was supposed to go on a cross-country tour in an electric car but couldn't complete the trip due to lack of chargers, even when the advance team was running around in a gas-powered car was amusing.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
75480 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 8:04 am to
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
32516 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Yep. Old concept.


It's actually a 19th century concept...along with the internal combustion engine.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
43195 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 11:04 am to
Either way, old idea.

* Point of fact, while the earliest steam powered trains date back to the early 1800s, the rail system itself is actually several hundred years older.
This post was edited on 1/9/25 at 11:11 am
Posted by bluedragon
Birmingham
Member since May 2020
9062 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 11:09 am to
Smell like Wal Mart Shoppers right?

Trains did well in cities where cars and buses suck. Tokyo was perfect for trains. New York and Chicago the same.
Posted by RollTide4547
Member since Dec 2024
3649 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 11:24 am to
quote:

We’ll be taking flying drones to work


Was told in high school that we'd soon have flying cars (like the Jetsons). That was early 80's...
Posted by RemouladeSawce
Uranus
Member since Sep 2008
17243 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

High speed trains are great, but many Americans are not very enthusiastic about rail travel. And that’s unfortunate. The trains in Europe are fast and convenient .
Is the issue not wanting to travel by rail or is the bigger issue opportunities to travel overall?

Legally required PTO (federal/country-level)
- France 36+
- Spain 36
- Italy 32
- All Nordic Countries 31+
- Germany 30
- UK 29
- Japan 26
- US 0

Work culture makes a huge difference, and even at senior level/white collar levels, we’re workaholics. Also our poors spend their money on goods, not travel

That aside, even if you snap fingers and give us high speed rail everywhere and standardize all other variables, our rail demand is far lower. You can get from Paris to the Riviera in under 3 hours. They have cool diverse shite to see in most directions in a short radius. We don’t
This post was edited on 1/9/25 at 1:43 pm
Posted by Limitlesstigers
Lafayette
Member since Nov 2019
3803 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 1:51 pm to
Lot of reasons.
1.) It actually makes sense for a few parts of the country, just not the entirety.
2.) IT only works in places like Korea, Japan, and Europe which are all very densely populated and have short distances between major distances. (The route between Tokyo and Osaka for example only takes about 3 hours and passes through an area with over 40 million people.
3.) Most of our rails are privately owned.
This post was edited on 1/9/25 at 1:53 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram