- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/25/25 at 12:06 pm to HeadCall
quote:
Hopefully what happens in DC is a success and voters around the country demand the same results from their local and state politicians.
I've said from the beginning that this is what the whole thing is about and I saw a video of Vance giving an interview about this in which he explicitly confirmed that theory.
I support Trump doing it in D.C. because he has the legal Constitutional authority to do so there. I also support Trump using the National Guard in any locale if necessary to protect ICE agents where the local officials will not follow and in fact attempt to impede the enforcement of federal law.
Beyond that it's a bad idea.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 12:06 pm to Lizardman2
quote:
You would also be hard pressed to find individuals that reside in particular areas of cities burdened by excess crime and murder to oppose it.
Then why have the constantly voted for
quote:
the elected in charge that have exponentially failed their constituents year in and year out.
quote:Apparently residents of large cities. That’s their problem to fix. Sending in the US Army to take over our cities is not the answer.
Who the frick in the history of ever has opposed less crime and killing?
Posted on 8/25/25 at 12:10 pm to HeadCall
quote:
Agreed. Hopefully what happens in DC is a success and voters around the country demand the same results from their local and state politicians.
This is what I am hoping for.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 12:11 pm to HeadCall
Not loving it but its needed to clean up the mess your leftist policies created
Posted on 8/25/25 at 12:20 pm to HeadCall
quote:
Then why have the constantly voted for
If we ever clean up voting laws, we may find that they really are not voting for this.
I mean, if I were a Democrat, I would be harvesting all the homeless votes in my city with a quickness. Plus I would be paying for retirement home farming. Everything we already know they do.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 12:23 pm to HeadCall
Not me. I want troops sent to surround these cities so no one can get in or out.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 12:23 pm to TBoy
quote:
There’s no real details about what they are actually doing.
Unless you are exclusively beaming MSNBC straight into your a-hole, this is patently false.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 8/25/25 at 12:24 pm to HeadCall
Hell no.
You are not going to like it when the Dems are in charge and do their own version.
You are not going to like it when the Dems are in charge and do their own version.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 12:28 pm to TigerVespamon
quote:
No. The “citizens” of shite hole cities get what they vote for. If they wanted it fixed, they would vote the Dems out!
Sorry, but the dims claim that these people aren’t smart enough to vote for themselves, so the dims are having to vote for them. If that’s the case, they can’t also say that the crime rate should be controlled by good politicians & policy voted in by those same stupid people. It’s a viscous cycle that will never end, and only get worse as the dims in charge slip farther and farther into reprobacy. Unless someone outside that cycle takes action to end it. So, yes, I am in favor of troops being used to stop people from murdering each other. I recognize that this good can and most likely will be attempted to use for evil in the future by those same dims who hate their power base being disrupted. BUT- you cannot fail to do what is right and good because you are living in fear of the revenge of truly evil people. It’s up to the rest of us to help keep good people with integrity elected and in office, to use the power given to them to NOT allow dim revenge to fall and look out for the good of the people.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 12:29 pm to HeadCall
I do, on the condition they're given free reign to shoot to kill.
If not, just back off and allow Cipolla's law to play out. They'll kill each other via gang banging.
If not, just back off and allow Cipolla's law to play out. They'll kill each other via gang banging.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 12:33 pm to sumtimeitbeslikedat
quote:
BUT- you cannot fail to do what is right and good because you are living in fear of the revenge of truly evil people.
Bingo!
Posted on 8/25/25 at 12:35 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Unless you are exclusively beaming MSNBC straight into your a-hole, this is patently false.
I know you are completely satisfied with vague statements because they are accepted by you as confirmation of what you want to believe. But those numbers are essentially meaningless.
Who made the 1007 arrests and for what?
Are those people actually detained somewhere? On what crimes?
Who seized the guns and under what circumstances?
quote:
Last night, another 86 arrests including multiple suspects accused of assaulting law enforcement and National Guard
Are people actually attacking law enforcement and National Guard troops? Or are they just arresting anyone who says something they don't like? It sounds like the Guard troops are creating the interactions that result in many of the arrests. That does nothing to actually reduce crime.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 12:36 pm to TBoy
quote:
It sounds like the Guard troops are creating the interactions that result in many of the arrests. That does nothing to actually reduce crime.
Why does it sound like this?
Posted on 8/25/25 at 12:36 pm to TBoy
Lol it's the guard guys fault!
Posted on 8/25/25 at 12:46 pm to HeadCall
President would have to declare an emergency under a few statutes. Absent a natural disaster he would have to most probably do it under the Insurrection Act under a provision that would hold that the municipality is not going to enforce federal law like Eisenhower in Little Rock or at the University of Alabama.
President can't wake up and say that he has a problem with how Mamdani or Bass in LA is handling the crime situation in their city. DC is a little different from others because of the Federal nature of the District. At most Trump could call in the NG to protect Federal buildings in other cities, but they would be confined to those areas.
President can't wake up and say that he has a problem with how Mamdani or Bass in LA is handling the crime situation in their city. DC is a little different from others because of the Federal nature of the District. At most Trump could call in the NG to protect Federal buildings in other cities, but they would be confined to those areas.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 12:53 pm to HeadCall
I do. Lincoln sent them into Atlanta.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 12:55 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
However it needs to work..even if cities pay...but i have ZERO problems with there being national guard troop in places like new Orleans during mardis gras.
Voluntarily asking for extra help during dedicated crowd focused major events and placing federal troops into cities as “peacekeepers” are very very different things.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:06 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
but i have ZERO problems with there being national guard troop in places like new Orleans during mardis gras.
In that instance, more than likely, local authorities asked for support from the Governor... It is typical for events where the population explodes over a week or so for that event then subsides...
I DO NOT support sending troops into the Dem shiteholes... They created these shiteholes and they should foot the bill for cleaning up what they created...
The Governor's of those states has the power to send in the NG under Title 32 status... Let them deal with it in that manner if it comes to that...
What I could see happening in a State like LA with a Republican governor is Trump offering to pay the bill and let the governor retain control under Title 32 to send the NG into a shitehole that needs cleaning up...
Posted on 8/25/25 at 1:10 pm to HeadCall
Not me.
DC is one thing. But we should not want the Feds sticking their noses in local issues unless absolutely necessary.
DC is one thing. But we should not want the Feds sticking their noses in local issues unless absolutely necessary.
Popular
Back to top


1








