re: Who flooded Europe with muslims and why?

Dumbasses, why don't you do a modicum of research before spouting off your "globalist" nonsense. You might realize that although your concerns may be justified, the reasons for the Muslim communities in Europe were due to policies that were stupid but had nothing to do with muh "globalism".

It began in Germany after WW II. There were not enough working aged males to cover all the work of rebuilding, so the West German government started the guest worker program that imported in large amounts of guest workers from Turkey in the early 50s. Then in 1962 in France, you had the end of the Algerian conflict and a lot of Algerians who were de facto French citizens....if not actual French citizens given the law in France, moved to France...like the Harki's. Then the dissolving of overseas empires created a bigger problem policywise for them and stupid policy decisions like family reunification that got out of hand resulted. But also, it was the Algerians and Tunisians that were the workers who did the shite jobs that no one else in France was interested in doing.

In England in the 50s there was a shortage of native born English men who wanted to do the lower end municipal jobs like bus drivers,etc so in order to keep things running the went to their "colonies" in the West Indies, first and basically told them as members of the Commonwealth they could come to England with a plane ticket and be treated as a citizen.....then they extended that to all members of the commonwealth.

Stupid policies borne out of economic necessity that got away from them

quote:

---

Why are they trying to destroy the US? Do they think they’re going to lord over the peasants? If they think that’s what will happen, I think they’ve got it all wrong. They have no idea of the shitstorm that will grip this nation if the middle class is destroyed.

---

It, and our currency are being destroyed NOW and no politician or citizen is trying to stop it

Open Society Foundation is behind much of the organization and funding of it.

Their goal is to destroy all traditional boundaries like religion, national identity, etc.

Soros groups earmark a shite load of money to pay off politicians.

Yep, Germany has been suffering from low childbirth rates really since WWII. The guest workers came and the work lasted a long time so they settled down and became "residents" so much so that you have an ethnic subgroup called Turken Deutsche ......and they are assholez

quote:

---

it was the Algerians and Tunisians that were the workers who did the shite jobs that no one else in France was interested in doing.

---

You have such contempt for the poor

These were jobs the French couldn’t afford to take.

quote:

---

The Germans did it for cheap labor.

---

Thats why its tolerated in some circles in the USA.

Americans are too lazy to do hard labor and Politicians are putting downward pressure on wages.

The lowly educated/trained American will lose his spot.

It didn't have to be muslims solely, it was to be anyone most available who in enough numbers would eventually change the very face and culture of the West.

The soft tools were there for exploitation, e.g., Tony Blair in Britain and the former Stasi member in Germany - Merkel. Then there's France.

Muslims just fit the objectives better than the other potentially anti-West groups. They've got the numbers that types like the Rothschilds and Milners look at adoringly.

First, their doctrinally required hijrah is all the motivation they need to pull up from their original digs to go spread themselves among other countries to fester there until there are enough numbers to eventually take over. So they don't need anyone to convince and guide them to "immigrate," it's doctrinal for them.

The ones now coming across our border need someone to guide them like the coyotes and other manipulators.

Two notable instances of it have been Kashmir and Bosnia/Sarajevo (now the Bosniaks prevail in numbers), where the incursions were highly successful for the muslims. In two very disparate areas of the world.

The neo-Marxists who did the Authoritarian Personality study looking for those who as much even hoarded a secretive tendency toward fascism exempted muslims from the study. Now why?

Early on the little behavior modification experts anchored in Frankfurt and the ones in Tavistock realized that muslims were so beaten down and thoroughly controlled by their own religion - they knew what went on in the madrassas - that they would not be good candidates for marxist conditioning. They have no room for it in their perpetual oppressive state of "submission,"

So it was more than enough that they hated western culture at least as much as the little marxian behaviorists, if not more. So the two are by their own dictates symbiotic when it comes to targeting the West.

Why the two most insidious threats to western culture are the two "M's."

They both fit the bill splendidly for the objectives of the Gramscians, Kalergi-ists, progressives, the Madison Avenue gang.

It's all unfolding before our eyes, even while so many would prefer to look the other way and pretend it's not, naively believing that if they ignore it, it will eventually work itself out through assimilation.

Eventually assuring them the peace and tranquility they believe can be bought through pandering and capitulation.

But that is what the academic propaganda mills and media - assisted by the government - have produced for us now in enough numbers to rock the Republic.

Always good posts.

Why are you so scared of the truth?

First time using one of those.


Velika Hvala "Thank you much" from my ancestral language.