- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Which state is just itching to outlaw interracial marriage?
Posted on 7/7/22 at 8:31 am to Y.A. Tittle
Posted on 7/7/22 at 8:31 am to Y.A. Tittle
No state is itching to ban interracial marriage. This is just a leftist dog whistle to gays that their marriage rights are in peril and to make republicans look like racists for wanting to save black babies from getting aborted.
I don’t believe that gay marriage will be, or should be overruled any more than interracial marriage. I don’t think anything in Dobbs required it.
This shite is all based on Thomas’s note in the concurrence in Dobbs. I think what he meant was - whether we still have fundamental or natural rights that aren’t enshrined in the constitution. It’s an uber nerdy constitutional debate between “positivists” and “originalists” and “textualists” in the constitution - and ultimately it doesn’t fricking matter and won’t change the result.
Marriage in and of itself has existed as long as time. The 14th amendment has not. The 14th amendment doesn’t permit discrimination based on fundamental rights or based on race, sex or national origin, and it provides all of us equal protection of the law. I don’t think gay ppl are a protected class, but I do think marriage is a fundamental right. Abortion (per dobbs is not).
I have no issue with gay marriage. None. I don’t think marriage is a federal issue. It should be regulated by states. Much like guns should be.
Where marriage and guns are similar is that, unlike abortions, we have a fundamental substantive right to marry, and we have a fundamental substantive right to self defense. If the right is fundamental - then the state would have to provide some compelling basis that would survive strict scrutiny to restrict the right. So long as the two ppl are adults, then seriously BTFO. The state has no business voiding your marriage, any more than it can say - You can’t buy a gun.
By contrast - there would be a monumental problem if 2 gay people wanted to get married in a church that doesn’t recognize marriage from
a spiritual standpoint, and California wanted to pass a law that said the Catholic Church has to perform marriage services for gay people. These churches have a 1A right to not marry the people. I think the same would go for cake bakers, etc. and one of these days I’m going to figure out how these bakeries don’t have a 1A right to refuse to cater gay weddings.
I am divorced. I am also Catholic. If I get married again, and the ceremony occurs on my back porch, well in the eyes of Louisiana - I’m married. In the eyes of the Catholic Church, I’m “living in sin.”
So frick em. Seriously Baws. So long as nobody is forcing your church to marry gay adults - I do not see the issue and refusing to legalize gay marriage is as crazy to me from a public policy standpoint as refusing interracial marriage from a strictly legal standpoint. Believe what you want in your church.
And feel free to disagree with me- but I have never in my life known a gay person who could un-gay. I have, by contrast known gay people who lived with deep seated toxic shame about being gay that has wrecked and ruined their lives and that’s just not good, especially when they were married to a straight person with kids
I don’t believe that gay marriage will be, or should be overruled any more than interracial marriage. I don’t think anything in Dobbs required it.
This shite is all based on Thomas’s note in the concurrence in Dobbs. I think what he meant was - whether we still have fundamental or natural rights that aren’t enshrined in the constitution. It’s an uber nerdy constitutional debate between “positivists” and “originalists” and “textualists” in the constitution - and ultimately it doesn’t fricking matter and won’t change the result.
Marriage in and of itself has existed as long as time. The 14th amendment has not. The 14th amendment doesn’t permit discrimination based on fundamental rights or based on race, sex or national origin, and it provides all of us equal protection of the law. I don’t think gay ppl are a protected class, but I do think marriage is a fundamental right. Abortion (per dobbs is not).
I have no issue with gay marriage. None. I don’t think marriage is a federal issue. It should be regulated by states. Much like guns should be.
Where marriage and guns are similar is that, unlike abortions, we have a fundamental substantive right to marry, and we have a fundamental substantive right to self defense. If the right is fundamental - then the state would have to provide some compelling basis that would survive strict scrutiny to restrict the right. So long as the two ppl are adults, then seriously BTFO. The state has no business voiding your marriage, any more than it can say - You can’t buy a gun.
By contrast - there would be a monumental problem if 2 gay people wanted to get married in a church that doesn’t recognize marriage from
a spiritual standpoint, and California wanted to pass a law that said the Catholic Church has to perform marriage services for gay people. These churches have a 1A right to not marry the people. I think the same would go for cake bakers, etc. and one of these days I’m going to figure out how these bakeries don’t have a 1A right to refuse to cater gay weddings.
I am divorced. I am also Catholic. If I get married again, and the ceremony occurs on my back porch, well in the eyes of Louisiana - I’m married. In the eyes of the Catholic Church, I’m “living in sin.”
So frick em. Seriously Baws. So long as nobody is forcing your church to marry gay adults - I do not see the issue and refusing to legalize gay marriage is as crazy to me from a public policy standpoint as refusing interracial marriage from a strictly legal standpoint. Believe what you want in your church.
And feel free to disagree with me- but I have never in my life known a gay person who could un-gay. I have, by contrast known gay people who lived with deep seated toxic shame about being gay that has wrecked and ruined their lives and that’s just not good, especially when they were married to a straight person with kids
Posted on 7/7/22 at 8:32 am to squid_hunt
quote:
15% of the population
quote:
insignificant statistic.
Hmmm
Posted on 7/7/22 at 8:54 am to Y.A. Tittle
The ONLY groups interracial marriage hurts are black women and Asian men.
Posted on 7/7/22 at 9:15 am to AubieinNC2009
quote:
no state is looking to outlaw it. I believe it is still techincally illegal in the Alabama state constitution but it is not enforced as no one cares.
Nah, that was overturned in a 2000 state referendum. LINK Alabama was the last state to overturn such laws, so overturning that SCOTUS ruling actually wouldn't make any interracial marriages illegal anywhere in the country unless y'all think there's some major movement to pass new laws banning interracial marriage. I can't imagine anyone even winning a primary with such a platform.
This post was edited on 7/7/22 at 9:17 am
Posted on 7/7/22 at 9:16 am to Y.A. Tittle
None its a talking point from the democrats, trying to divide us
Posted on 7/7/22 at 9:19 am to squid_hunt
White paternalism, pandering is fueled mostly by guilt.
The guilt seems so deeply entrenched it might someday be considered a part of their genetic code.
Was said long ago that the white man has within himself the seeds of his own destruction.
The guilt seems so deeply entrenched it might someday be considered a part of their genetic code.
Was said long ago that the white man has within himself the seeds of his own destruction.
Posted on 7/7/22 at 9:21 am to Y.A. Tittle
I would hope none would outlaw it interracial marriage. There's only one race of humans that we all share in.
From the Christian perspective, there is no distinction between Jew or Greek in terms of relationships with one another in Christ.
From the Christian perspective, there is no distinction between Jew or Greek in terms of relationships with one another in Christ.
Posted on 7/7/22 at 9:28 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Which state is just itching to outlaw interracial marriage?
they must create a narrative to get the minions to blindly support them
something
anything
anything at all
no matter how bizarre
Posted on 7/7/22 at 9:31 am to Esquire
quote:
Exhibit A
I understand your inability to read or understand nuance. You wouldn't be a racebaiting douchebag otherwise.
Posted on 7/7/22 at 9:37 am to squid_hunt
quote:
I understand your inability to read or understand nuance.
I don’t understand your ability to get triggered by black people in your commercials
Posted on 7/7/22 at 9:41 am to Y.A. Tittle
Absolutely nothing wrong with interracial marriages....as long as they are a male and a female, IMO.
Posted on 7/7/22 at 9:42 am to Esquire
quote:
I don’t understand your ability to get triggered by black people in your commercials
Yes, you do.

Posted on 7/7/22 at 10:26 am to squid_hunt
quote:
Yes, you do.
Of course, except for those who have been successfully conditioned to purposely look the other way, when faced with obvious examples of Kalergi-ism hard at work.
It's not so much the images spewing out of Madison Avenue and other places like a torrent for the last few decades, it's the underlying reasons for them.
In authentic neo-Marxian behavior modification mode, which is patient and oriented toward the future, it's become less about reaching every demographic to sell a product than it is about testing the waters for the degree of acceptance while promoting a preferred behavior.
Let's just call it a long-existing, "wished for" look for the entire West, but showing the most promise here in this country.
Posted on 7/7/22 at 10:31 am to squid_hunt
quote:
Yes, you do.
Lol. There are zero commercials in existence that say anything about white replacement. Your own fears are eating your fragile mind.
Posted on 7/7/22 at 10:56 am to squid_hunt
quote:
Yes, you do.
You need to find articles about low-testosterone or menopause in men to find a reason for your triggering emotions when you see black people trying to sell you Tide
Posted on 7/7/22 at 11:03 am to Esquire
quote:
You need to find articles about low-testosterone or menopause in men to find a reason for your triggering emotions when you see black people trying to sell you Tide
Yep. Just a conspiracy theory.
Posted on 7/7/22 at 11:13 am to squid_hunt
quote:
Yep. Just an incel conspiracy theory.
FIFY
Posted on 7/7/22 at 11:37 am to Esquire
quote:
FIFY
Conspiracy theories are the new facts, buddy. One after another comes true.
Back to top



2







