- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Where is this board on Kirk assassination, conspiracy or not?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:12 pm to TutHillTiger
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:12 pm to TutHillTiger
He’s on a beach with Elvis and Tupac
0
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:14 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
But that implies complicity, not conspiracy.
You are right but conspiracy just means the help of one or more people.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:15 pm to TutHillTiger
It certainly has all the hallmarks of a mossad op
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:15 pm to the808bass
quote:
hallmarks
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:19 pm to TutHillTiger
I think it's a conspiracy by definition, because I don't think the kid was the only person involved in the planning, or conspiring of it.
I don't believe it was "the government" or "the Jews," but it doesn't have to be anyone in particular for it to still be a conspiracy.
I don't believe it was "the government" or "the Jews," but it doesn't have to be anyone in particular for it to still be a conspiracy.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:20 pm to GumboPot
quote:Right. I'd speculate the troon knew something was up (pun intended) or maybe encouraged it. But conspiracy would imply active assistance in the deed.
You are right but conspiracy just means the help of one or more people.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:21 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
Where is this board on Kirk assassination, conspiracy or not?
He certainly had help with planning. It wasn't a larger conspiracy of any sort and it's stupid to believe or claim otherwise.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:26 pm to TutHillTiger
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:31 pm to TutHillTiger
It was ANTIFA. These are the co-conspirators. Trannies who are disgruntled Mormons. Candace Owens is a fricking insane person
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:33 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Chris Martenson is out with a terrific video analysis that rebuts many of the false claims circulating on social media about who shot Charlie Kirk. Martenson proves beyond a reasonable doubt that it was not a .30-06 round that took Charlie’s life. I am posting below a video of a dummy composed of ballistic gel and a human skull that is a sickening illustration of the actual power of the .30-06. It also was not a pistol of any kind, especially the alleged palm pistol.
LINK
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:37 pm to GumboPot
quote:
I don't believe Kirk was shot with a 30-06. Not enough damage. I've seen a 30-06 ruin the back strap on a deer from 200 yards when the heart was missed.
I'm no expert here, but I think that has to do with the toughness of the area.
For example, if you shoot one through just a piece of paper, I bet the hole is very small. There isn't enough resistance.
The neck seems like an area that would offer some of the least resistance possible on a human body.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:37 pm to TutHillTiger
Of course its weird
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:39 pm to GumboPot
MLK was shot with 30.06 and it lodged in his spine from a closer distance.
Bullets do weird things.
Bullets do weird things.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:40 pm to TutHillTiger
There is an entire network that needs to get rolled. It’s militant groups that have identity issues.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:42 pm to TutHillTiger
Idiot
Posted on 10/30/25 at 5:57 pm to Bunk Moreland
Caught the Jimmy Dore Show podcast earlier today and he has proved they're are several holes in the official gov't investigation. People need to have an open mind when dealing with the corruption still within the FBI.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 6:24 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
I am not sure I wasn’t right to begin with.
Shocker!
Posted on 10/30/25 at 6:29 pm to TutHillTiger
I do not believe he was shot with a .30-06.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 6:33 pm to TutHillTiger
Hell yeah I question the Tyler Robinson lone gunman theory.
They’ve lied about the weapon used. We all know what the damage WOULD have looked like, and it wasn’t that.
The bs texts between him and his alphabet club tranny boyfriend are so unrealistic it’s comical.
Why the need to IMMEDIATELY remove the camera right behind Charlie as his body was taken away?
Why the scene cleared and cleaned and remodeled so quickly?
Charlie was a very influential person.
Of course I don’t believe the Robinson kid did this by himself (or at all). Also, I’ve never once seen his family say he did this? We HEAR that from others, but we don’t see that.
They’ve lied about the weapon used. We all know what the damage WOULD have looked like, and it wasn’t that.
The bs texts between him and his alphabet club tranny boyfriend are so unrealistic it’s comical.
Why the need to IMMEDIATELY remove the camera right behind Charlie as his body was taken away?
Why the scene cleared and cleaned and remodeled so quickly?
Charlie was a very influential person.
Of course I don’t believe the Robinson kid did this by himself (or at all). Also, I’ve never once seen his family say he did this? We HEAR that from others, but we don’t see that.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 6:36 pm to texas tortilla
Of course an autopsy was performed. It's the LAW in Utah.
What a stupid fricking question
What a stupid fricking question
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News