- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: When did Republicans stop caring about bodily autonomy?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:14 pm to BamaAtl
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:14 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
a sense it did, by not properly equipping her with the knowledge and tools to prevent pregnancy and not properly allowing for a situation in which raising a child would be beneficial.
None of this, absolutely none, is the state’s responsibility.
0
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:14 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Correct. I think the question revolves around viability
Which is ever changing. NO matter what way you slice it you are ending the life of a homo sapien. I'd bet that homo sapien would rather live and have a chance at a fun life instead of being poisoned and pulled out in piece by piece. I'd venture to bet 25 plus percent of pro choice people would change their mind after watching an actual abortion being performed.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:15 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Well shite
That pretty much guts your whole thread.
Why does the woman suddenly lose "bodily autonomy" in the last 3 months?
Let me make a reasonable argument here. When conception first occurs, that cluster of cells is more an extension of the mother than it is a separate being. Over the 9 months, it slowly moves from being part of the mother to being separate. There isn't really a magical place to draw a line in the sand. So, we are left to choose somewhat arbitrary points in time like heartbeats or trimesters.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:15 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
So you are telling us that women are so dumb that they do not know what causes them to get prego?
Nah, just that abstinence-only education is a poor substitute for actual education.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:15 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Life of a human being trump's your desire to do as you please.
How do the fetus's rights trump the pregnant woman's?
You can want to use your body to kill your neighbor but your neighbor's right to live supersedes your right to do what you want with your body.
Same for the unborn child.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:15 pm to civiltiger07
quote:She used to try and leave the impression she was a doctor........but then, stepped on her proverbial dick
I want the back story!
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:15 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Fetus, not baby. And it's the decision of the individual who is gestating the fetus at the time the decision is made, because theirs is the body being used.
IT IS A HUMAN BEING AT CONCEPTION YOU PIECE OF FUKING ELEPHANT shite
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:16 pm to civiltiger07
quote:It was awhile ago but basically she was blathering on about health insurnace and was promptly fricking crushed.
I want the back story!
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:16 pm to BamaAtl
quote:I agree. Being killed for convenience is definitely a violation of one's rights.
That's very dishonest of you. In this scenario, someone's rights are being violated.
quote:We were stupid
As a society, we've chosen for 40 years to acknowledge that the pregnant woman's rights supersede those of the fetus.
quote:Yes
Suddenly, Republicans want to do a 180 on this.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:16 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
That's very dishonest of you. In this scenario, someone's rights are being violated. As a society, we've chosen for 40 years to acknowledge that the pregnant woman's rights supersede those of the fetus. Suddenly, Republicans want to do a 180 on this.
There has been a very large and very vocal group of people against it from the start.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:16 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
think the question revolves around viability,
Define viability
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:16 pm to BamaAtl
quote:I thought the question revolves around bodily autonomy? Why would it matter if a "fetus" is viable or not if it's inside a woman who wants to kill it?
Correct. I think the question revolves around viability, which isn't the same thing as life cycle.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:17 pm to BamaAtl
quote:So.
Nah, just that abstinence-only education is a poor substitute for actual education.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:17 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
That pretty much guts your whole thread.
Why does the woman suddenly lose "bodily autonomy" in the last 3 months?
Viability. Obviously. Were birth to be induced, the baby would have a reasonable chance of surviving, so the mother doesn't have to be forced to continue the pregnancy (though obviously better for the future baby if she does).
Have you not been paying attention?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:17 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
the pregnant woman's rights supersede those of the fetus.
what percentage of pregnancy's legitimately are a threat to the mothers life?
If the pregnancy is not a threat to the mother I don't know why there is a need for the mothers rights to supersede the baby's rights.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:18 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
So are you actually a doctor?
Yep!
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:18 pm to BamaAtl
Why are we even arguing anymore in this thread?
Bama's entire premise was that "bodily autonomy" was paramount and then.........she fricking drops this after like 30 pages.
Just to show it again
Well shite
That pretty much guts your whole thread.
Why does the woman suddenly lose "bodily autonomy" in the last 3 months?
Bama's entire premise was that "bodily autonomy" was paramount and then.........she fricking drops this after like 30 pages.
Just to show it again
quote:
Provided we make exceptions for rape/incest/mother's health/incompatibility with life I have no problem with third-trimester bans.
Well shite
That pretty much guts your whole thread.
Why does the woman suddenly lose "bodily autonomy" in the last 3 months?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:18 pm to Nguyener
quote:
Another person who doesn't know what "viable" means in this context!
Define it.
The ability of a fetus to survive outside the womb.
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:19 pm to BamaAtl
Why are we even arguing anymore in this thread?
Bama's entire premise was that "bodily autonomy" was paramount and then.........she fricking drops this after like 30 pages.
Well shite
That pretty much guts your whole thread.
Why does the woman suddenly lose "bodily autonomy" in the last 3 months?
Bama's entire premise was that "bodily autonomy" was paramount and then.........she fricking drops this after like 30 pages.
quote:
Provided we make exceptions for rape/incest/mother's health/incompatibility with life I have no problem with third-trimester bans.
Well shite
That pretty much guts your whole thread.
Why does the woman suddenly lose "bodily autonomy" in the last 3 months?
Posted on 5/16/19 at 1:19 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
As a society, we've chosen for 40 years to acknowledge that the pregnant woman's rights supersede those of the fetus.
So we've been getting it wrong for 40 years. Time to start getting it right.
Page 41 of 52
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News